The Great K Debate...
|
 Coolness: 150555
| Madforbrad, your retarded. |
|
Coolness: 150555
| ... and your wrong too, you cock sucking loser. |
|
 Coolness: 44645
| Originally posted by NTER...
but mdma was synthesised from the idea of mda some time after mda was synthesised bye an independent. ;)
yes but like i've already stated twice , the term designer drug was originally given to chemicals that were different in structure so that they did not fall under the same drug laws. Now if mda was illegal before MDMA , why would someone change MDMA into MDA if MDA was illegal first
therefore the definition provided does not allow MDA to be considered a designer drug. |
|
Coolness: 150555
| Originally posted by MADFORBRAD...
Originally posted by nter...
but mdma was synthesised from the idea of mda some time after mda was synthesised bye an independent. ;)
the term designer drug was originally given to chemicals that were different in structure so that they did not fall under the same drug laws. |
|
 Coolness: 92360
| that was what the whole argument was abotu in the first place bahaha, and I only mentioned MDA cause I have no clue when it was legalised, but now I know why Mico called MDMA a designer drug, cause it was probably the legal alternative to MDA at the time. How ridiculous. |
|
Coolness: 44645
| yes but according to Micos definition , a designer drug is an already existing drug synthesised into something else with similiar effects to avoid drug laws. Therefore MDMA can't be a designer drug because it was synthesised before MDA , and MDA can't because it was illegal before MDMA. None of those chemicals meet the criteria of the definition provided.
I'm wasting my time here |
|
 Coolness: 91785
| This argument is pointless because the term "designer drug" is not a proper scientific term, its a scare phrase invented by the government and which has caught on in the press. Whether a drug is or isn't a "designer drug" has absolutely no relevance for someone that is interested in a drug's safety, its effects, or possible uses. Its just a neat little phrase for anti-drug people to use when propagandizing against MDMA. |
|
Coolness: 92360
| Are we all supposed to know the history of MDMA? Look for the key words probably and maybe, which clearly illustrate, that wasn't my point. My poitn first was what a designer drug is and second that you're trying to twist the argument to your advantage by makign useless poitns no one cares about and contradicting yourself probably hoping no one will notice how you slyly change the point of debate.. anyway, this is gay and useless. |
|
 Coolness: 471900
| he'll keep arguing, will never give anyone credit |
|
 Coolness: 76785
| Originally posted by MADFORBRAD...
I'm wasting my time here
So why are you here? I could understand if you get a kick out of riling people up, but aside from that don't complain about wasting your time here and still log on on a regular basis. |
|
Coolness: 471900
| he's mad and acting rude cuz in fact he's deeply sad right now ,....
notice that he stopped posting lately ... |
|
 Coolness: 69495
| hes a quack. |
|
 Coolness: 34285
| i believe him because its like...1 vs.10 or 15 peeps |
|
 Coolness: 53545
| a friend has been suggesting intramuscular while on california sunshine, haven't tried it yet |
|
 Coolness: 89580
| man do i ever miss looking down at my feet and wondering what those silly things covering them are! |
|
 Coolness: 685685
| :lol |
|
 Coolness: 40065
| K is one of the most interesting substances out there. Don't take it at a party, it's just not that kind of drug. Just take some and put the chillest CD you have (some ambiant is the best) and feel yourself float into the void... |
|
 Coolness: 42340
| Originally posted by DEMEZRIEL...
K is one of the most interesting substances out there. Don't take it at a party, it's just not that kind of drug. Just take some and put the chillest CD you have (some ambiant is the best) and feel yourself float into the void...
Sure, K isn't a party drug.
But, with the potential of addiction with this stuff, it is not worth to take of it at all.
If you want a little advice, stay away from that scrap. |
|
Coolness: 40065
| Hmm yes I guess there could be potential addiction with K, but not to the degree of coke or downers. At least that's my and a few friends opinion. I think it's a substance that can bring you alot... it helped a friend out of a depression, and this was not just while under the effects but ever since. I mean it's a psychedelic , not a downer , if you take enough... I don't know, I guess some people might get hooked with the fact that you rarely bad trip on real K, but that's the nature of the substance. It's not about feeling happy or feeling unhappy, depressed or extatic, it's something else. All your emotions are gone and you are left with comedy and pure thought as you leave the dualism of our good/bad filter of on the world, and that's why I find it a unique and worthy entheogen. But yes people, take it responsibly, don't try to prolong the experience more than a couple of hours, and above all be sure that the white powder you have is REALLY K... (if you haven't seen it come out of the bottle, or if your source is not a close friend, then don't trust it). |
|
 Coolness: 77265
| Beware,
Hole ahead |
The Great K Debate...
You must be logged in to post a reply.
