The Great K Debate...
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:37pm |
 Coolness: 44750 | it says in your own post that the drug laws were changed in 1986. We are in 2005. The term designer drug has evolved. Your posts are only relevant if talking abotu designer drug history but they have no relevance today. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:45pm |
 Coolness: 150660 | ???
History has no relevance today? Maybe the terminology has changed. But if so, prove it. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:50pm |
| Coolness: 44750 | i would
But i'm afraid it would blow your mind |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Aug 29, 2005 @ 11:57pm |
| Coolness: 150660 | try me |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 12:06am |
| Coolness: 44750 | well ok
I won't even have to get any new sources to prove my point. My point being that you are an idiot. The truth , this i'm not too concerned with. Now in your earlier post , you stated that designer drugs are cut to evade drug laws. This is completely false. According to your own source ,designer drugs (historically) were chemicals that were modified so that although no longer the same chemical compound , still had the same effects. Cocaine mixed with baking soda is still cocaine. Therefore your argument of designer drugs being cut for drug law purposes is completely illogical and false. IT is the same compound. ergo you are a moron |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 12:32am |
 Coolness: 92465 | no YOU are a moron, you try to twist everything around. The definition he gave clearly says designer drugs molecularly modified to be slightly different in order to evade drug laws. Cutting your coke with baking soda does not evade drug laws and therefor is not a designer drug. It also does not change anything on a molecular level, therefor not the definition of designer drug he gave. Addign baking soda does not molecularly modify something.
Designer drug is a term to used to describe psychoactive drugs which are created (or marketed, if they had already existed) to get around existing drug laws by modifying their molecular structures to varying degrees[/] pretty clear. not that I care anyway, but you're a fucking retard. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 12:41am |
| Coolness: 150660 | Obviously, you have no sources to prove your brilliance, considering you keep refering to my posts. I may be some what of an idiot... but clearly not as much as you. Sorry, to prick your over-inflated-egotistical-balloon, buddy, but what i've posted is the truth -regarldless of whether or not your concerned with it.
The point i've repeating -ever since I read absolutely uneducated post- was that these drugs (ever since the 'Controlled Substance act (1 and 2)') have been modified to "...bypass the legal regulations and to produce more potent substances...". Now, if you will READ and UNDERSTAND what any reference to any inquiry refering to 'what is a desinger drug?' you will -hopefully- be able to comprehend 'what is a desinger drug.' Ketamine is a Designer drug. MDMA is a Designer drug. You are an arrogant ignoramus now go masturbate in the mirror, you fucking loser. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 8:48am |
| Coolness: 44750 | Originally posted by MICO!...
Obviously, you have no sources to prove your brilliance, considering you keep refering to my posts. I may be some what of an idiot... but clearly not as much as you. Sorry, to prick your over-inflated-egotistical-balloon, buddy, but what i've posted is the truth -regarldless of whether or not your concerned with it. The point i've repeating -ever since I read absolutely uneducated post- was that these drugs (ever since the 'Controlled Substance act (1 and 2)') have been modified to "...bypass the legal regulations and to produce more potent substances...". Now, if you will READ and UNDERSTAND what any reference to any inquiry refering to 'what is a desinger drug?' you will -hopefully- be able to comprehend 'what is a desinger drug.' Ketamine is a Designer drug. MDMA is a Designer drug. You are an arrogant ignoramus now go masturbate in the mirror, you fucking loser. let me say this with as few big words as i can You do realise that your sources contradict what you say ? Cutting drugs with a filler is very different from synthesising a new drug with similar effects which is what your sources state. I claimed that your sources were old and irrelevant to todays meaning of the word but never did i say they were wrong. But you are flat out wrong. Ketamine is an animal tranqualiser. Givin your definition of designer drug , it doesn't fall under any of those criterias. It hasn't been modified , it is still ketamine. And logically speaking , MDMA in its pure sense has not been modified either so in reference to the definition given in relation to today , you can't make the same claim they made 20 years ago. Pure MDMA is not a designer drug. Not anymore. You aren't a very logical person at all/ |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 10:40am |
 Coolness: 92695 | a designer drug is a drug that was created outside of a "government" lab or pharmaceutical company. synthesized bye a "designer" . if you call putting a spec of h in some mdma and pressing them synthesizing something then i guess you could call a "pressed pill" a designer drug. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 11:25am |
| Coolness: 44750 | which i did |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PitaGore replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 1:54pm |
 Coolness: 472005 | so you're too smart for pills but you're stuck up to K and GHB and all those awful chemicals,
wow, how clever ! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 7:30pm |
 Coolness: 154875 | minou? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Densetsu13 replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 8:16pm |
 Coolness: 76890 | I'm still waiting for Madforbrad's sources, considering Mico did so, he could at least do the same (regardless of how right/wrong/contradictory mico was).
Anyone else enjoy seeing this shit diturber go at it? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PaT_ replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 10:24pm |
 Coolness: 116495 | Originally posted by DENSETSU13...
I'm still waiting for Madforbrad's sources, considering Mico did so, he could at least do the same (regardless of how right/wrong/contradictory mico was). Anyone else enjoy seeing this shit diturber go at it? good point. Originally posted by madforbrad...
well ok I won't even have to get any new sources to prove my point. My point being that you are an idiot. ergo you are a moron Instead of using emotionally charged language and attacking the person in which your arguing with (which doesn't help your situation what so ever, no matter how right you might be) why don't you either fuck off, since were all daft and your all brains, or stop acting like a bully and prove whatever the fuck it is your trying to prove intelligently and with respect towards others. Instead of calling us all stupid, why don't you try and enlighten us... wiTH backing up everything you say with references, cause honestly... no one gives a fuck what you have to say or what your opinion is unless you back yourself up. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 11:07pm |
| Coolness: 44750 | I did back myself up
His sources prove my point. I've logically explained this but you people fail to see it. What more can i do other than call you guys retards retards |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Tue Aug 30, 2005 @ 11:13pm |
| Coolness: 92695 | this is like a flutie flakes all over again. iss great. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Wed Aug 31, 2005 @ 5:19am |
| Coolness: 92465 | the only thing you logically explained is that coke cut with baking powder isn't a designer drug.. thanks genius. I don't really trust someone's opinion who thinks 'designer drugs' refers to a pretty picture on a pill. what are you, a little girl? Ur ass is backwards. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Wed Aug 31, 2005 @ 5:19am |
| Coolness: 92465 | but I agree that mdma is not a designer drug. Maybe mda. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Wed Aug 31, 2005 @ 10:23am |
| Coolness: 44750 | mda was illegal before mdma
And was synthesised in 1910 it isn't a designer drug you twit |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Wed Aug 31, 2005 @ 2:55pm |
| Coolness: 92695 | but mdma was synthesised from the idea of mda some time after mda was synthesised bye an independent. ;) |
The Great K Debate...
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
