MADE: Walking Dead S01E01 leaked! first 5 minutes is a good start (see movie thread for links)

sOYEZ prêt for cuteness Overload.
(the dog's FB page)

[ www.facebook.com ]

whaaaattt?? blasphemous!! where's my pitchfork and torch?

[ www.nataliedee.com ]

You didn't know about Walking Dead? Someone should buy you Walking Dead book 1 and 2!
I can't wait for the tele series. I wonder how they're going to film the SPOILERS scenes, especially those with children.


Also there's RDR Undead Nightmare. Cow-boys, 6 shooters, and undead bear!

WALKING DEAD

[ www.megavideo.com ]

or you check the torrents for the leaked episode.
It's 10 days away, a higher resolution should be released.

Kids (1995)
with Chloë Sevigny and Rosario Dawson.

(Nasa parties, Limelight, Tunnel, Caffeine) "Kids" not a rave movie per say...
just that 'rave' was growing just as we were growing up.

oh I just remember "Party Girl" (1995) with Parker Posey.

Again not a rave movie.. but she's a promoter who gets arrested for throwing an illegal party and she gets a job at a library to pay her fines. She organized her DJs friend vinyls with the library decimal system. It's a light comedy. That's all I can recall.

[ www.sugarpost.com ] Metal art

^
that's the synopsis for CRANK 3.

He doesn't have income but wants to help finance a party?

I wasn't hitting on anyone, just exchanging a couple of IMs, and poor insecure guy took it all wrong. That PM is over 5 years old too. Noah, these articles are entertaining. Any chance you will write a non-fiction article? Spill out the dirt, names, and drama.

the dolphins gif made my day.

uumm.... 'cause...you know... getting penalties doesn't help.




Also 44 - 48
44 SAVES
48 Shots At

seriously you can't let your goalie do everything, got to help him once in a while.

I don't think it was Price fault... It was the players getting bad penalties.

my inbox... <3 ravers.

wtf.. 0-2 to 4-3

[ www.tianya.cn ]

some Cthulhu items.





[ missmonster.bigcartel.com ]

Big Tits Zombies (aka Big Tits Dragon, Japan 2009)

starring Japanese AV Idol (porn star) Sola/Sora Aoi, this light comedy horror doesn't take itself seriously. With the budget of a high porn production, it has ridiculous zombie acting, horrible set ups, cheap sound effects, weird CG blood, and absolutely minimal storyline.

But hey, it got titties (but not enough screen time tho), cute Japanese girls (with their costumes), a katana, a chainsaw, a sombrero, and zombies! It has some moments, like this [ ] Cookies for ancient Japanese folklore undead appearance.

[ www.demonoid.com ]

Borderlands is a good game, but it's always the same enemies.

Condensing my post was a bad idea.
Let's put up some graphs so we can know what the fuck we are talking about shall we? I will said for now I am an atheist (left on the graph).











You guys just links wiki articles and mentioned forms of arguments without elucidating why you said them in the first place? I'm not saying it is bad in practice. It's just I have to guess what you are talking about. Instead of addressing the issue at hand, you're erroneously accused me of wrongful argument tactics?

I'm going to take a shot in the dark, and assume "Reductio ad absurdum is a mode of argumentation that seeks to establish a contention by deriving an absurdity from its denial, thus arguing that a thesis must be accepted because its rejection would be untenable." [ www.iep.utm.edu ]

errr...are you implying that: my argument is piss poor 'cause I'm saying that, in a God Hypothesis, the chance of god is highly unlikely is the truth since it's impossible to be false". I think you're applying this to an atheist gnostic. Would you feel better if I said that the probability of god existence is really extremely low instead of impossible? Just as saying water will not freeze at 0c is really extremely low instead of water not freezing at 0c is impossible? ( that is on Earth in standard pressure).

I don't believe in god because I'm highly confident (99.9%) with all the empirical arguments, rational thinking, naturalist laws pointing that way. Then you would accused me of being (Atheism) Agnostics since I didn't say 100%. If I don't believe, if I know ( 100%) for sure god don't exist, then you would accuse me as having the same position as FAITH position.

You would (you did) put me in the same category as a Theist. However I already proven that is wrong because I didn't make a leap of faith to have this conviction (see the quote from Atheism, a very short Intro). There is plethora of proof for a naturalistic world and so far none for the existence of god, then we what reason can we have to supposed god exist?




did you even read what was in the article 'cause in that very article: "Evidence of absence is evidence of any kind that shows, indicates, suggests, or can be used to infer or deduce the non-existence or non-presence of something. In some sense "absence of evidence is sometimes evidence of absence". For instance, absence of evidence that there are malignant cells is evidence of absence that there is cancer."

Since you like Wiki link so much, here's one for you.
[ en.wikipedia.org ]

When I said there is evidence of absence, I mean this (I can't said it better myself). I hope this is enough:






Yes. but why do you dismiss the existence of Smurfs entirely and not god? For the typical Atheist, it's the same thing. At least we have signs of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.



No one said Science is omniscient... Maybe you are associating science as the doctrine of the Atheist as religion is to god? That's a huge no no. This here [ www.gly.uga.edu ]

" Science is the concerted human effort to understand, or to understand better, the history of the natural world and how the natural world works, with observable physical evidence as the basis of that understanding. It is done through observation of natural phenomena, and/or through experimentation that tries to simulate natural processes under controlled conditions. " "The examples above are observational science, but there is also experimental science. "

Science is a system, a way, for us to gain knowledge so we can understand the universe and proposed models of reality. That's why science has theories, and some are thrown away 'cause they don't work. Some do, such as the Sun will rise to the East and set in the West.



I can prove to you that gravity exist if I push someone off the Empire State building. When human are extinct, gravity will still be there. We don't need faith to "believe that". Or do you actually think is that by believing in gravity is what makes gravity possible? It's your choice not to believe in factual knowledge, but don't come crying when you don't believe you will get burn by putting your hand through fire.






Atheists don't need to prove anything, they lack the belief, that's it. Dpif and other people clearly explain why. We can agree what god is by what the Theists tell us what god is. god just happens to be omniprescent since it conveniently suit their purpose. There is no purpose in denying or lacking belief in God, there is no agenda. Some Atheists might also be against religion, there are some who are Theists and are against religions.

What you perceive as arrogance is your prerogative. You give the unfavorable quality of atheists being arrogant. Typical. This is a common tactic in politics and debate, instead of addressing the issue at hand, one simply attack the opponent so whatever he has to say, no matter how insightful or reasonable, it gets unheard because that person has a negative characteristics. Dawkins seems arrogant, even to me, but that doesn't disqualify him from making good arguments.

"One of the most curious is the assumption that atheists are arrogant. Why? Because making assumptions without even caring enough to bother to ask questions in order to learn more is itself a sign of arrogance. " -Austin Cline

--------------------

If god exists and we find god, then we surely charged god with crimes against humanity.
that's it.

The difference between this message board and others is that this one, [ rave.ca ] , pertains mostly to umm... the party people of Montreal. This medium (the internet) is filled "I'll say anything I want to because it's anonymous and I won't fear the repercussions or deal with the consequence". But this doesn't give you, and me, or anyone free reign to be umm.. irritating.

Since most of us who post or lurk live in/around Montreal, and the thing is, I would assume, most of you guys/girls go to the same parties, listen to the same music generally, drink around the city. Basically, everyone will bump into someone one way or another. So what you say here, can indirectly affect people attitudes towards you in person.

you may not care, but don't be surprise if people give your the cold shoulder.

(look I'm just trying to helpful. Nothing against you. Personally, I don't care)

repost?

Should I read all the previous posts and dissect them? or go play PS3?

Ya I know what you mean.. I can't say anything about Chloe Moretz cast without spoiling.
I'm not concerned about the Cinematography, (nor the acting). I'm worried about the dialogue/script/screenplay: "let me point that out to you and ill even said it out loud".

"Let the Right One In" Sweden 2008

It's the story about a 12yo boy who has no friends and is being bullied at school. He finds solace with a 12yo girl who just move in next door. It's nicely done, artsy, beautiful story about friendship.

Find a torrent and watch it (that is if you're smart enough to appreciate foreign film and read subtitles.) Yes torrent 'cause the DVD/BR release screw up the translation so bad that it missed the whole story. So get the Film Festival release.




Hollywood ALREADY made a REMAKE of this... "Let Me In" will be release next month. They cast the girl from Kickass. Definitely don't watch the trailer of the remake. Everything will just be spoiled (including the Swedish version). I hope the remake will add to the story (for the audience who didn't read the book) and not be a cheap mainstream popcorn thrill.

what is YOUR PROOF that there is NO UNICORNS, NO GOBLINS, NO SANTA CLAUS?
If you aren't sure if God exists or not, how can you be sure whether or not there is a blood fairy with a chainsaw in your fridge? Think about it for a second.... because... hmmm? The lack of empirical evidence is evidence of non-existence.

Why are you putting the hypothesis of God/Creator in a different, a higher standard than the dragons, Cthulhu, and Shiva? Right, 'cause Theism have so pervaded our societies and histories, that believing in God is the default view.

You are confusing ordinary beliefs with religious beliefs. Atheists use the word belief because it's way more convenient than: "I am nearly 100% sure, I am almost certain, etc..."



""What is Agnostic? (from guardian.co.uk )
Theist version: An atheist is certain there is no God, an agnostic is not certain.
Atheist version: An atheist believes there is no God, an agnostic doesn't know.""

If you're not certain, is it because you lack faith? If you don't know, it is because you didn't research, discuss, and think about it? how can you make up your mind about anything? Why does Agnostic only comes up when the Abraham god comes into view?

(This post is as short/condensed I can put it.)

[ blog.okcupid.com ]

I was thinking about sentient intelligent lifeforms. Anyhow basic life is already found on another planet: Mars. Well at least in its past.



I think the chance of another intelligent alien life with extra-solar space faring capabilities in the same time line as us (and happens to be next door) is highly improbable.

see this --> [ www.google.ca ] FERMI Paradox

and this: [ science.slashdot.org ]

It wouldn't be like that.. Humans aren't made for space, so some branch of humanity will probly evolved by genetic whatever-scientific term into living in long deep space travel in zero G. Aliens, if they exist, could very well take the same paths. The first encounter is likely between these deep space scouts who will look more like each other then their respective species 'cause they were adapted to do the same job so to say.

Then again, these "aliens" could have been humans that were send off a long time ago and we forgotten about them. They could have evolved into something totally different that we might as well mistaken them for aliens.

-------

Hawking is just spewing the 3rd point 'cause he wants to bring Astrophysics into mainstream or whatnot by using "fear" as method. Hide from aliens, wtf? At least get their numbers..

[ www.dailymotion.com ] this Tianeptine drug users video ? I remember that. warning: not for squeamish.

lemme wiki this shiite

bloody hell I read

" Westboro Baptist Church Burns The KorEan "



Atheism is NOT A form of belief... I don't understand how people can't grasp the concept of "a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings."

NOT BELIEVING IN ANYTHING/SOMETHING DOESN'T MAKE ITSELF INTO A BELIEF. wow. really.

hahaah, the girl's family are so unscrupulous. They paid their neighbour, an elderly woman, to fake a rescue of the puppies from the river. They don't give a shit about anything except themselves

[ technolog.msnbc.msn.com ]

[ currentaffairs.ninemsn.com.au ]

whoa, those aren't the right currency. Here's a new quote

I want this. The entire collection.











[ www.insectlabstudio.com ]

oh do did I win?

^ if you like dance culture, you should check out this channel. [ www.youtube.com ]
their videos are very well produced.

Pay attention at the 45sec mark. Liveleak has the audio

[ www.liveleak.com ]

I can't afford to neutered my mother's dog, but I'm getting my daughter a video camera. Yes we have internet connection so you see we are not as backward as you think.

Wild dogs are numerous here, we can't afford to raise them. I need to put food on the table for my kids. Isn't the problem the solution in this case?

just to add:

Anthropomorphism is wrongly apply in this case. The puppies feeling fear is not an anthropomorphic quality we magically give them. Animals do actually experience fear (among other feelings). If animals didn't have "fear" then all the preys would have succumbed to predators a long time ago.

What we are invoking in response of the girl's action is inter-species altruism. An example of inter-species altruism, [link=news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7291501.stm]dolphin saves 2 whales.


[ news.bbc.co.uk ]

I thought it looked like a soccer ball and felt like kicking it.

I regret my words... I want the HEAT back. I don't need sleep.