Who You Gonna Vote For?
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:15am |
 Coolness: 339640 | the US will never invade Canada, just about every country in the world would come to our rescue if they were to even try.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» fukt replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:17am |
 Coolness: 71660 | if the US really wanted to, they could take over the world. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» hayley replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:33am |
 Coolness: 82620 | agreeed. so much as everycountry mght WANT to come to our aid... the us could nuke them 569432675892 times before they did sooo... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 2:09am |
| Coolness: 339640 | heh, the US is not powerfull enough to take over the world.
hell, china could kill em just by landing on American shores.. and just keep sending more and more troops.. people see Americans as so damn strong cause no major war has ever taken place on their own land.. but if it came to their doorstep, they'd be just as weak as any other country.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» hayley replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 2:20am |
| Coolness: 82620 | no major war? umm. *cough* american revolution geniassss. u know how many people died ? how many soldeirs there were?? and what it brought about through the us's ultimate win??
and the us couldnt take over jsut cuz its a country fll of dumbasses.... and t feeds off of everyone elses resources... but it could cause some major damage just through its complete disregard of human life.... espeiallly that of the citixens of other countries.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 2:28am |
| Coolness: 339640 | civil war doesn't count. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Trey replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 2:30am |
 Coolness: 102740 | google US invasion of Canada and you'll find all the answer you need for what might have been an all US North America.
if you think about murder, you already took a step in doing the deed [ www.glasnost.de ] The following is a full-text reproduction of the 1935
plan for a US invasion of Canada prepared at the US Army War College, G-2 intelligence division, and submitted on December 18, 1935. This is the most recent declassified invasion plan available from the US archival sources. Centered pagination is that of the original document. The spelling and punctuation of the original document are reproduced as in the original document, even when in error by present-day norms.... And please, there is a difference between destroying the world and conquering the world. Sure, the United States can thermonuclear planet Earth 30 times over, but it is not in their best interest. It is no one best interest. In the conventional war, United States of America can't not possibly defeat against a united Europe and Russia, let alone the world. The industrial output of the US doesn't nearly equal that of the world. The Middle East and Latin America can easily cut off the exportation of oil. Do you know the logistic of fuel consumption for a war? Also, China has a population of 1 billion which 250 million are men of fit fighting age. The U.S hardline foreign policy is not about conquering land... it is about geopolitical power. To aid friendly goverments and dissentents of a non-friendly countries for the purpose of selling their natural ressources and human labour to private american companies and/or establish a military base. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 3:02am |
 Coolness: 150435 | Hmm, okay...
So I guess I was wrong in assuming that there isn't a possibility of the U.S invading Canada. I'm sorry... I should have know better. But that wasn't actually what I was trying to get across. What I meant to say was that considering the amount of might the U.S millitary holds with it's $267-billion dollar budget, versus, our measly $7.8-billion dollar millitary budget, not to forget the difference in man power. I figure the attempt in boosting millitary funding would be quite futile. And yes, considering the maturity and intellectual level of this disscusion, I would undoubtably be considered underage. ARHHHHHHH... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» BOBDYLAN replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 3:25am |
 Coolness: 148160 | Ok I will vote...For once and for all.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 8:42am |
 Coolness: 174065 | those asians... more men than the americans have bullets. now that is proper war tactics. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» hayley replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:20pm |
| Coolness: 82620 | Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...
civil war doesn't count. i wasnt talking bout the civil war you tard. i was talking bout THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: AMERICANS(french) VS BIRTISH. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 3:09pm |
| Coolness: 339640 | that constitutes a civil war in my eyes. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 3:10pm |
| Coolness: 339640 | not to mention war 250 years ago is somewhat different than war today. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 3:16pm |
| Coolness: 174065 | how in the hell is two countries fighting over land considered a civil war? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» hayley replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 3:38pm |
| Coolness: 82620 | lol seriously??? a civil war is a war between oneself... but the states were only ever colonies part of the british commonwealth... they werent actual part of the country. The people of the America's possessed their own ideologies that were completely different from those of georgeian england |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» fukt replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 4:36pm |
| Coolness: 71660 | neonuts, you got served. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 4:41pm |
 Coolness: 201200 | neoform: the civil war was more like 150 years ago
also... Pearl Harbour and the WTC attack can probably be considered acts of war that took place on American soil. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 5:24pm |
 Coolness: 121415 | Originally posted by CLOWN...
I think people should just vote for the green party.. they have idea's that will help the country as a whole, not throw away more money. we need a party that thinks about pollution levels and the environment. None of the other parties care about that stuff.. they insted peach on how there gonna help schools and health plans.. like every other year.. and nothing gets done.. so for all you dumbasses voting for beer or any other imaginary party, why not try and make a difference in society and participate, to eventually try and change things a little.. get off your lazy asses and vote... i tought i was gonan vote that way too- but they don't even stand a slight chance.. i feel like my vote could be better used towards a party with similar ideas that aren't as extreme |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 5:32pm |
 Coolness: 68950 | ok.. american revolution.. wait.. HOW amny people even LIVED in the US at that time... lets do a google search:
[ www.state.nh.us ] 80,000 in 1775 and when the revolution was over: 65,000 thats 15,000 lives lost... impressive |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 9:44pm |
| Coolness: 339640 | Originally posted by [ FUKT ]...
neonuts, you got served. ah yes, matt makes his entry with as usual a very intelligent comment.. |
Who You Gonna Vote For?
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
