Who You Gonna Vote For?
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 1:25pm |
 Coolness: 121415 | yeah i only see the opposite, even for education |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 2:13pm |
 Coolness: 174065 | sarah no. im voting conservative. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 2:45pm |
| Coolness: 121415 | bahahhahahahaha |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ontheroadagain replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 2:54pm |
 Coolness: 54310 | Originally posted by VIOLENCE INC....
To all those who say the conservatives are against pro choices, that is not the case. They simply want the lady to get third party counseling. Which i think is realistic. Ever go to the clsc and see an alone terrified 14 year old... i think she needs a lil support, than just a tube shoved up her throwing salt water in her hole. i think you're selectively reading/posting snippets of info. From the Globe and Mail: ""It will not be sponsoring a referendum on that matter, the matter of how those kinds of services are delivered are within the provincial jurisdiction." Mr. Harper was responding to questions on abortion a day after his party's health critic, Rob Merrifield, suggested a proposal that women seeking the procedure seek independent, third-party counselling. Mr. Harper suggested Mr. Merrifield went slightly "off message" on the party platform by suggesting that women get counselling before abortions "A leader of a party can go off message, I suppose any member of a party can. We know it's a sensitive issue...and I urge people caution in an election campaign about what they want to communicate to the public in terms of party position," he said, in what appeared to be a warning to his health critic." Harper doesn't wanna bring up the topic because he's against abortion...and he knows that'll screw him in the polls....anti-abortion, anti-pot, anti-gay marriage.....sounds like Conservatives don't like anything to do with personal choice. And on the pot topic, i wouldn't bitch at all....i'd rather see cash spent on pot go to funding gov't programs than to large dealers. When i read/listen to the Green Party, i have to put on my "hippie-speak" filter so i don't let all the heart-tugging, save-the-world stuff cloud my vision. In the end, i feel as though they will actually fix the problems as opposed to patching the symtoms. When i read/listen to the Conservative party, i put on my "business-speak" filter so i can filter out the postive choice words, ambiguous hints and artful dodges. In the end, i really worry about how people will be treated and what global games we'll take part in. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» troublenBASS replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 9:35pm |
 Coolness: 42070 | ANY BODY BUT BUSH!
oh wait, wrong country. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» eLDee replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 9:36pm |
 Coolness: 120890 | Yeah, vote for me! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» BOBDYLAN replied on Mon Jun 14, 2004 @ 11:16pm |
 Coolness: 148160 | "Le débat des chefs" french version was hillarious!
Tomorow will be better.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 12:59am |
 Coolness: 150435 | From what I've read/heard... Conservatives and Liberals are aiming for privitisation. And from what I've listened to from selling medical benifits, that is the last thing I want.
If Liberals were actually liberal, I would consider voting for them. Although, considering that Paul Marting was the finance minister at the time that of the sponership- scandle, I don't think I can trust him, or his party. As for building up military. I think thats a big waste of money. The only party that seems to have potential (for a greater good) is the green party and NDP. "If I offered you the moon, would you let me be your valentine." |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 9:17am |
| Coolness: 174065 | ya just wait when the americans invade us when there is a civil war between Quebec and the rest of Canada. SCREWED I TELL YOU< SCREWED! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» eLDee replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 1:15pm |
| Coolness: 120890 | "when there is a civil war between Quebec and the rest of Canada."
I'we been preparing for that one for loooong time now.. I guess all those war years will come in handy. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 1:35pm |
 Coolness: 339640 | yeah ok.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» clown replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 2:36pm |
 Coolness: 221740 | I think people should just vote for the green party.. they have idea's that will help the country as a whole, not throw away more money. we need a party that thinks about pollution levels and the environment.
None of the other parties care about that stuff.. they insted peach on how there gonna help schools and health plans.. like every other year.. and nothing gets done.. so for all you dumbasses voting for beer or any other imaginary party, why not try and make a difference in society and participate, to eventually try and change things a little.. get off your lazy asses and vote... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» no.name replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 3:44pm |
 Coolness: 129165 | indeed |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» thehemeraproject replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 4:27pm |
 Coolness: 42725 | I believe it's just logicial for a person who has an average income (or less) to vote for a left wing party.
Even if our economy gets stronger, with the Liberal or Conservative in power, the average taxpayer will not be richer. Only the rich benefits from neo-liberalism. And about the debat des chefs, Layton looked and sounded like a bad a car seller, Harper seemed constipated but he will own in the english debate, Martin kept using his catch lines (la sante, c'est notre prioriter...*big smile*), and Duceppe was invincible. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» princesslucky replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 10:13pm |
| Coolness: 47505 | Conseratives are modern nazi |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 10:16pm |
 Coolness: 68950 | i vote red...
i dont care who it is.. as long as its red cuz thats the only colour i see when i think government ... who knows... i might be voting communist! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Jun 15, 2004 @ 10:34pm |
| Coolness: 150435 | Us invading Canada!?
What are you talking about? Sure there are tall tales telling that "one day the US is going to invade us for our Fresh water" or whatever. But in all honesty, what will a couple extra billion-dollars do to aid us against a country that spends $300-billion more than N.Korea? Nothing!! So in the time being.. I'd like money spent else where. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» hayley replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:01am |
 Coolness: 82620 | well the thing is.. once our dolalr surpasses theirs in value... they will no longer look to us for our natural resources... and if they do.. theyll try and bargain our prices down... if we dont concede.. a war COULD ultimately break out....////// there is potentiel |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:08am |
 Coolness: 299300 | arent you underage? what are u doing in this thread? ARHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhh |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» fukt replied on Wed Jun 16, 2004 @ 1:13am |
 Coolness: 71660 | in this election any vote is a wasted vote.
ideals, goals and reality have never been so far apart. |
Who You Gonna Vote For?
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
