Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
Page: 1 2 3 Next »»Rating: Unrated [0]
Firefox 1.5rc3
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Mon Nov 28, 2005 @ 3:10pm
nuclear
Coolness: 2603995
The site loads like shit in it... Anyone know why! Stupid firefox!
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Nov 28, 2005 @ 7:28pm
neoform
Coolness: 339675
could it be.. that:
a) ravewave doesn't have w3c compliant html?
b) it's a "RC - Release Candidate" ?

1.5 should be out in like a week or two.. why the rush to use the RC?
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Lone_Star replied on Tue Nov 29, 2005 @ 9:25am
lone_star
Coolness: 153065
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

could it be.. that:
a) ravewave doesn't have w3c compliant html?
b) it's a "RC - Release Candidate" ?

1.5 should be out in like a week or two.. why the rush to use the RC?


What he said... it's a RCSTD uncompliant w3c html thing!
I know my stuff.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Tue Nov 29, 2005 @ 9:11pm
nuclear
Coolness: 2603995
Well v1.5 is out and still buggy so I'll fix it sometime in the near future...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Nov 29, 2005 @ 11:31pm
neoform
Coolness: 339675
haha. yeah.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 4:02am
v.2-1
Coolness: 159130
Yeah, had that release for 2 weeks now, thought I was the only one with this problem so didn't deem it to be a worthwhile bug to fix. Apparently not so, thankfully.

Glad to see I'm not the only one. :)
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 1:59pm
flo
Coolness: 146335
stable release 1.5 is out today
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 1:59pm
flo
Coolness: 146335
...and [ mozilla.org ] becomes [ mozilla.com ] :S
what exactly is this hiding ...?
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mr_Frog replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 3:28pm
mr_frog
Coolness: 97110
just compiled it, dunno, no rendering problem with ravewave here!
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 4:36pm
v.2-1
Coolness: 159130
Yeah, I revise my statement : I downloaded v1.5 last night & installed it.

The website is fine now, I'm guessing they knew about it and fixed it before the final release.

So it's all good in da hood.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 5:37pm
neoform
Coolness: 339675
noah fixed the problems..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 5:42pm
v.2-1
Coolness: 159130
Did he ? Oh ok. Well thanks Noah ! :)
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» clown replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 7:28pm
clown
Coolness: 221775
ahh, that would explain why the firefox site was down this morning...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 11:53am
nuclear
Coolness: 2603995
I fixed the problems... ;) Hmm guess I'm too late for this reply... Neoform speaks for noah...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lakester replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 3:24pm
lakester
Coolness: 59690
Originally posted by FLO...

...and [ mozilla.org ] becomes [ mozilla.com ] :S
what exactly is this hiding ...?


they're not hiding anything...

[ www.mozilla.org ]
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 3:59pm
flo
Coolness: 146335
Originally posted by LAKESTER...

Originally posted by flo...

...and [ mozilla.org ] becomes [ mozilla.com ] :S
what exactly is this hiding ...?


they're not hiding anything...

[ www.mozilla.org ]

i saw that... but i certainly won't say they're not hiding anything (even if this might be true)
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 6:16pm
neoform
Coolness: 339675
nothing like a conspiracy theory.............

[ .com ] is more widely accepted/used by people. duh.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» trashandsuicide replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 6:37pm
trashandsuicide
Coolness: 75280
People think [ .org ] sites are not as good as [ .com ] sites because of [ .org ] auditory resemblence to "ogre".
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lakester replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 6:52pm
lakester
Coolness: 59690
Mozilla is simply staying true to what the top level domains are for. Their non-profit organization resides on a [ .org ] domain. Their commercial organization resides on a [ .com ] domain.

I wish I'd have known all the extensions I have installed wouldn't be compatible with v1.5.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 8:56pm
flo
Coolness: 146335
Originally posted by TRASHANDSUICIDE...

People think [ .org ] sites are not as good as [ .com ] sites because of [ .org ] auditory resemblence to "ogre".


well [ .org ] is the most widely used domain by organisations that are "altermondialist" or "open-source" or simply anything that's trying to do things in a "human" spirit.

however [ .com ] domains are preferred for business activities... that's why they chose to use it for their commercial activity.

my main concern is about the lasting of the free, open-source, and user-oriented development sides of mozilla. they mightstart gaining power like google and then stay on the verge of falling into the dark side of the force...
Firefox 1.5rc3
Page: 1 2 3 Next »»
Post A Reply
You must be logged in to post a reply.