Firefox 1.5rc3
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Mon Nov 28, 2005 @ 3:10pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Nov 28, 2005 @ 7:28pm |
could it be.. that:
a) ravewave doesn't have w3c compliant html? b) it's a "RC - Release Candidate" ? 1.5 should be out in like a week or two.. why the rush to use the RC? |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Lone_Star replied on Tue Nov 29, 2005 @ 9:25am |
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...
could it be.. that: a) ravewave doesn't have w3c compliant html? b) it's a "RC - Release Candidate" ? 1.5 should be out in like a week or two.. why the rush to use the RC? What he said... it's a RCSTD uncompliant w3c html thing! I know my stuff. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Tue Nov 29, 2005 @ 9:11pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Nov 29, 2005 @ 11:31pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 4:02am |
Yeah, had that release for 2 weeks now, thought I was the only one with this problem so didn't deem it to be a worthwhile bug to fix. Apparently not so, thankfully.
Glad to see I'm not the only one. :) |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 1:59pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 1:59pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mr_Frog replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 3:28pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 4:36pm |
Yeah, I revise my statement : I downloaded v1.5 last night & installed it.
The website is fine now, I'm guessing they knew about it and fixed it before the final release. So it's all good in da hood. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 5:37pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 5:42pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» clown replied on Wed Nov 30, 2005 @ 7:28pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 11:53am |
I fixed the problems... ;) Hmm guess I'm too late for this reply... Neoform speaks for noah... |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lakester replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 3:24pm |
Originally posted by FLO...
...and [ mozilla.org ] becomes [ mozilla.com ] :S what exactly is this hiding ...? they're not hiding anything... [ www.mozilla.org ] |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 3:59pm |
Originally posted by LAKESTER...
Originally posted by flo...
...and [ mozilla.org ] becomes [ mozilla.com ] :S what exactly is this hiding ...? they're not hiding anything... [ www.mozilla.org ] i saw that... but i certainly won't say they're not hiding anything (even if this might be true) |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 6:16pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» trashandsuicide replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 6:37pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lakester replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 6:52pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Thu Dec 1, 2005 @ 8:56pm |
well [ .org ] is the most widely used domain by organisations that are "altermondialist" or "open-source" or simply anything that's trying to do things in a "human" spirit. however [ .com ] domains are preferred for business activities... that's why they chose to use it for their commercial activity. my main concern is about the lasting of the free, open-source, and user-oriented development sides of mozilla. they mightstart gaining power like google and then stay on the verge of falling into the dark side of the force... |
Firefox 1.5rc3
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |