Microsoft Security Bulletin MS11-083 - Critical
Vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Published: Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Version: 1.0
General Information
Executive Summary

This security update resolves a privately reported vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if an attacker sends a continuous flow of specially crafted UDP packets to a closed port on a target system.

This security update is rated Critical for all supported editions of Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, and Windows Server 2008 R2. For more information, see the subsection, Affected and Non-Affected Software, in this section.

The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying the way that the Windows TCP/IP stack keeps track of UDP packets within memory. For more information about the vulnerability, see the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) subsection for the specific vulnerability entry under the next section, Vulnerability Information.

Recommendation. The majority of customers have automatic updating enabled and will not need to take any action because this security update will be downloaded and installed automatically. Customers who have not enabled automatic updating need to check for updates and install this update manually. For information about specific configuration options in automatic updating, see Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 294871.

For administrators and enterprise installations, or end users who want to install this security update manually, Microsoft recommends that customers apply the update immediately using update management software, or by checking for updates using the Microsoft Update service.

See also the section, Detection and Deployment Tools and Guidance, later in this bulletin.

Known Issues. None

Originally Posted By DRNYARLATHOTEP
Bill Gates gives 5$ for each copy of his email you forward to your contact list.

;)

Originally Posted By CUTTERHEAD
had the same problem before and here only , ITS JUST THAT THE ADMIN IS TO =INSERT-YOUR-COMMENT-OF-CHOICE-HERE= (i suggest technologically impared but it mostly points out to greed and laziness) in removing entries and defragmenting his lame sql database.

legally you can fill a complaint to the " barreau du quebec " since here is obviously hoarding information on people that want it retract but volountary refuse so.

i reminds you that its illegal to individuals to keep record on other ppl if they legally ask them to be withdrawl (registered mail) . and nuclear, is an indivudual. you need a name next to yours im in the complaint too.

face book is organisationnal , a buisness , [ rave.ca ] is own by a single guy : so let me be a little more clear in saying that if a basement dad kept pictures of you on his server , you could fill a cease and dissease letter to have your private belonging removed from his (and here its a policy changing site). so legally the same applies here

why do you think YOU CANT FIND SHIT ON wayback machine anymore ? -legitimacy-

DAVID DOUGHERTY, TRNN: Oakland, California, was jolted by massive demonstrations on Wednesday, November 2, after the Occupy Oakland movement called for a general strike. The move that drew thousands and effectively shut down the Port of Oakland, one of the largest in the country, came just a week after Oakland police seriously wounded Iraq War veteran and demonstrator Scott Olsen, after he was shot in the head with a tear gas canister. Davey D is an Oakland journalist and host of Hard Knock Radio who has been involved in social justice advocacy for years. He spoke with The Real News regarding some of the origins of the occupy movement and the general strike in Oakland.

DAVEY D, JOURNALIST, HOST OF HARD KNOCK RADIO, OAKLAND: There's two things going on: who's actually camping out in front of city hall, and who are the 99 percent that support it. Many of the people down there that were organizers were people of color. That's the first thing. The second thing that people are very clear about is that whatever Occupy is going on in Oakland stands on the shoulders of past efforts and movements. Oscar Grant movement, which crossed all types of racial lines, preceded the Occupy movement, where many of the same issues that are being addressed now were being addressed then--systemic unemployment, systemic police brutality, systemic economic disparity and tyranny. We saw communities of color facing record numbers of foreclosures, both in the black and brown communities in particular. These are things that were being addressed, and a lot of times they were ignored, even by people who, politically speaking and ideologically speaking, should have been in alignment with us. But the way that things work in this country, for better or for worse, we usually don't get involved with movements or we don't really start protesting until the problems are on our front steps. And so maybe a year ago, when people were talking about Oscar Grant and his execution by the BART police, and all the issues that were connected to that in the communities that came out protesting, you know, you didn't have the groundswell that you may have with the Occupy movement, you didn't necessarily see this covered on in some of the progressive journals. You didn't see his trial being a front-and-center issue the way that Occupy is. And so, you know, for many communities of color, the Occupy movement, we looked at it like, well, you know, welcome to our world. We've been dealing with this. And, you know, maybe you need to fall in and pick up some expertise from the people who've already been fighting these fights and join in. And I think to a large degree Oakland was able to do that.

DOUGHERTY: The demonstration has drawn considerable national media attention for several incidents of property damage and violent confrontations with police, who arrested between 50 and 100 protestors. Banks and fast food chains became some of the targets of vandalism, and in the early morning hours of Thursday, police confronted demonstrators who had occupied a vacant building. Many demonstrators hold that the overwhelming majority of protestors were peaceful, and that some even worked to subdue the violent black bloc anarchists accused of promoting the escalation. But as the dust cleared on Thursday following a night of heated tensions between police and some of the demonstrators, both the city and the Occupy movement were left wondering how best to respond. For Davey D, much of the discussion of violence has overshadowed the magnitude and significance of the largely peaceful port closure and general strike, which he says developed out of several overlapping struggles.

DAVEY D: This happened in a week. It came in the aftermath of the unrest that took place last Tuesday, in which we saw this brutal police repression. And people came back and reoccupied the City Hall Plaza--Oscar Grant Plaza. And there was a general assembly with about 3,000 to 4,000 people, and folks said lets call for a general strike. I think part of the understanding was that there are some very tangible things that people could be and should be doing. There was a very tangible target: banks, forcing them to close; and two, the port of Oakland. If you shut them down, they lose $8 million a day, and it impacts not only cities and customers up and down the West Coast but all around the country. Each day that you shut it down, shipments get delayed a week. So that seemed to be a very natural and understandable type of goal. The other thing is that part of what you have going on is these relentless attacks on the unions from the 1 percent all around the country. And so when you talk about strike, you're talking in the language of unions. There's a very strong union presence in Oakland, and they were already dealing with issues at the port already. And so that was a natural alignment, so to speak. The third thing is that in Oakland, shutting down the port seven or eight years ago in April 2003, there was an antiwar march, and people went to shut down the port, and police shot people with rubber bullets, injuring several, and caused a big mayhem. And we really haven't seen us shutting down the port since then. But out of that shooting came a number of lawsuits and edicts that the police had to agree to in terms of crowd control. We saw those tenets, so to speak, violated the week ago. And so people really wanted to push that envelope and go back to a place that they were shot upon by the police. So if you kind of line it up, it was the accumulation of all these incidents and more that really made this area fertile for the idea of a general strike, and its ultimate implementation was able to happen because of all these factors.

DOUGHERTY: Solidarity actions were held all over the country, as Occupy Oakland has galvanized the Occupy Wall Street movement following the police repression and subsequent popular mobilizations. While each city has its own unique experience and goals, all of the occupy movements are working towards creating a space to develop a project that challenges Wall Street and the standing economic order.

DAVEY D: I think every city has its challenges, every city has its history, and every city, when highlighted, symbolizes something special. If you're down in Atlanta, that's the cradle of the civil rights movement. How the Occupy Wall Street plays out there can only do so with that in the backdrop and that history intact. What it means in New York, where it first launched, there's a history there. It's in the belly of the beast. And so what happens in Oakland can be inspiring to what goes on in New York, can be inspiring to what goes on in Atlanta, and vice versa. And I think there are obvious similarities in terms of who we're targeting, and there's also similarities in terms of how those who we're targeting are reacting and then trying to push back--you know, they use the police, they use a campaign of disinformation with corporate media.

DOUGHERTY: Occupy movements across the country face considerable challenges with both local governments and approaching winter weather. In Oakland, the city council expressed a desire to end the Occupation camp, and Mayor Jean Quan stated that the camp may need to move to a different location. This is David Dougherty with The Real News Network.

Collective unconscious is a term of analytical psychology, coined by Carl Jung. It is proposed to be a part of the unconscious mind, expressed in humanity and all life forms with nervous systems, and describes how the structure of the psyche autonomously organizes experience. Jung distinguished the collective unconscious from the personal unconscious, in that the personal unconscious is a personal reservoir of experience unique to each individual, while the collective unconscious collects and organizes those personal experiences in a similar way with each member of a particular species.
Contents

Jung's definitions

For Jung, “My thesis then, is as follows: in addition to our immediate consciousness, which is of a thoroughly personal nature and which we believe to be the only empirical psyche (even if we tack on the personal unconscious as an appendix), there exists a second psychic system of a collective, universal, and impersonal nature which is identical in all individuals. This collective unconscious does not develop individually but is inherited. It consists of pre-existent forms, the archetypes, which can only become conscious secondarily and which give definite form to certain psychic contents.”.[1]

Jung linked the collective unconscious to 'what Freud called "archaic remnants" - mental forms whose presence cannot be explained by anything in the individual's own life and which seem to be aboriginal, innate, and inherited shapes of the human mind'.[2]

Archetypes and collective representations

Jung considered that 'the shadow' and the anima/animus differ from the other archetypes in the fact that their content is more directly related to the individual's personal situation'[3], and less to the collective unconscious: by contrast, 'the collective unconscious is personified as a Wise Old Man'.[4]

Jung also made reference to contents of this category of the unconscious psyche as being similar to Levy-Bruhl's use of collective representations or "représentations collectives," Mythological "motifs," Hubert and Mauss's "categories of the imagination," and Adolf Bastian's "primordial thoughts."

Minimal/maximal interpretations

In a minimalist interpretation of what would then appear as 'Jung's much misunderstood idea of the collective unconscious', his idea was 'simply that certain structures and predispositions of the unconscious are common to all of us...[on] an inherited, species-specific, genetic basis'.[5] Thus 'one could as easily speak of the "collective arm" - meaning the basic pattern of bones and muscles which all human arms share in common'.[6]

Others point out however that 'there does seem to be a basic ambiguity in Jung's various descriptions of the Collective Unconscious. Sometimes he seems to regard the predisposition to experience certain images as understandable in terms of some genetic model'[7] - as with the collective arm. However, Jung was 'also at pains to stress the numinous quality of these experiences, and there can be no doubt that he was attracted to the idea that the archetypes afford evidence of some communion with some divine or world mind', and perhaps 'his popularity as a thinker derives precisely from this'[8] - the maximal interpretation.

Marie-Louise von Franz accepted that 'it is naturally very tempting to identify the hypothesis of the collective unconscious historically and regressively with the ancient idea of an all-extensive world-soul'.[9] New Age writers go unhesitantly further, claiming that Jung himself 'dared to suggest that the human mind could link to ideas and motivations called the collective unconscious...a body of unconscious energy that lives forever'.[10]

Chanting Hare Krishna frees you from the reactions of all past karma. Chanting Krishna’s name even once, purely and sincerely, can free you from the reactions of more karma than you could possibly incur.

Originally Posted By MUTANTE
tiens, met le ton E! ;)

Originally Posted By GAMOS
What is PLUR to me?

I think PLUR symbolizes the infancy and child stages of someones journey into the rave scene. Its nothing more, and nothing less. When you first start raving, the uniqueness of what happens and the vibe you feel at raves, and the experiences you live is captured by PLUR. Theres an innocence to living plur. Its almost like a child who believes in santa claus, or the tooth fairy. In their mind, its real. And to a large extent, at that point in time in your journey, and for the people you generally associate with, it genuinely *is* real. PLUR exists in all its wonder. And its beautiful and breathtaking. You should enjoy it, and live it, and experience it.

I think one of the reason no one of us truly shits on PLUR, even though some n00b starts a thred every 3 months or so, is because we all felt it once. We all went through that stage. Even if we didn`t call it PLUR, cuz junglists dont do that, we all still felt it. Even if we`re jaded as fuck now, we remember our plur stage. Its an awesome stage of the journey, just like a child opening presents on christmas morning. How sad it would be if ravers didn`t get the plur experience! It would be like telling a child that there is no santa claus!

Originally Posted By ZOMBIENATHAN
As was said, check out the calendar: [ www.rave.ca ] , and look around 'til you find something that you like ...