Ça j'avous par contre!!! j'en riais à chaque fois!!! =)

Moi j'aime les femme tout court!

C'étais pas aussi pire que cela quand je suis aller en france!

Allo Van


Ça fais longtemps!

Les anglais essaient de nous convertir (à l'anglais, désolé je ne me souvient plus du terme) depuis qu'ils ont gagnés la guerre, cela n'a jamais fonctionné et là ils chialent qu'on parle a moitié anglais!

Flo je te comprends, mais on parle du fais que beaucoup de québécois, parle FRANGLAIS, j'avous que c'est dégeux parfois, mais il me semble qu'entre amis on peut bien le faire, mais quand je parle avec un ou une inconnu, je me force de bien parler francais, encore pire sur un forum, je coupe rareement mes mots et je m'éforce d'écrire correctement, pour mieux me faire comprendre, j'avous que des fois j'écris mal, mais des fois je procrastine!


=)

Non Van aime du monde, juste personne!

che Pho sur rosemont / st-denis, tu vraiment bon viet

non y'aime les filles de Qc :D

mouche? pk? explique et vien boire de la vodka

ouais elle est bonne mais c crisseent pas la meilleur

et les chattes

Rakoon ta gueule :D

prends st-laurent et va vers le sud, pas en auto c un one way!

no

/e se roule a terre!!!

:D


moi j'en mange quand chu soul au sipan en face des fouf! c'est pas mal toute

so old, they've done it like a thousant times

indeed

j'ai tu l'air d'un gars de 400 lb

wow ça c de l'insulte!

t même pas beau!!!

aussi bien dire t un gringalet de 100 lb

hey meilleur au sipan

work

bj on the road

drandrophiliak

non et toi?

shit on dirait presque des expression de la france!

j'ai jamais dit que je l'aimais ou encore que je la voulais, si tu saurais lire comme du monde tu t'en serais rendu compte!

meme encore ya personne PERSONNE

TELLEMENT pas vrai, je connais une criss de belle fille pis c la fille la plus asexuer que je connaisse

tellement

a part quand t avec des mordu, esti que c drole

talking about nonsense

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAT

indeed, but they're to many underage girl

French is easy try it up someday you could hook up with nice quebec city chicks ;)

BEHEMOTH


One of the classic examples of a so-called "Living Dinosaur" is an account taken from the Old Testament of the Bible. The word "behemoth", when translated from ancient Hebrew, literally means "kingly beast". The first official description of the Behemoth probably dates back to the book of Job, verse 40:15-19, of the Old Testament. In that text the Behemoth (also referred to as ENOCH) is the name given to a gargantuan, land dwelling animal, which is described thusly:

"Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron."

Written approximately 2,000 years before the birth of Jesus, the animal chronicled in the book of Job is considered by most Biblical scholars to be an imaginative interpretation of a large, modern animal, such as the elephant or the rhinoceros. There has been, however, some debate among traditional zoologists and theologians, which argue that - based upon the creature's description - the Behemoth was more likely to be an amphibious Nile dweller, such as the hippopotamus or the crocodile.

That having been said, the debate branches off into yet another sub-sect of scientists and researchers (particularly cryptozoologist and creationists, who, in this rare instance, make strange bedfellows), many of whom feel that the Biblical account may not be referring to what has become a commonly recognized African species at all, but something else altogether... something which most paleontologists would insist had became extinct long ago.

To many investigators, the Job text seems to be less like an exaggerated account of a large, land dwelling, African herbivore, and more in line with what an eyewitness description of a brachiosaurus or Apatosaurus might have been. In fact, one can easily draw comparisons between the depiction of the Behemoth in biblical texts and present day eyewitness testimony regarding MOKELE-MBEMBE.

The outcast academics (on both sides of the evolutionary line) who support this theory, refer back to the Old Testament text in order to more succinctly present their case. The first point made by these researchers is that cedars were some of the largest and most impressive trees in the ancient world. The muscular, trunk-like appendage described by Job hardly seems to correspond with the thin, reed-like tail of the elephant or the rhino, yet this analogy would accurately reflect the proportions (and estimated strength) of a diplodocus tail, as well as several other known sauropods.

The second point concerns the passage which states: "...he eateth grass as an ox." To many researchers, this corresponds perfectly with the vegetarian diet, which all sauropods almost certainly subsisted on. If religious teachings hold sway, then perhaps the world will be able to see the Behemoth first hand on CNN, as it was prophesized in the New Testament's "Book of Revelations" that this monstrosity would be destined for an apocalyptic battle with its sister beast the LEVIATHAN during the days of Armageddon (in Hebrew texts, the airborne ZIZ is also mentioned).

Whether one believes these Biblical accounts to be fact or fiction, the legends of the Behemoth continue to tantalize both ancient historians and fortean researchers alike, with there seemingly accurate reports of these supposedly extinct animals. Only by separating the wheat of "science" from the chafe of "dogma," can one truly understand the zoological significance of these Biblical reports.

nah je fais juste dire des mot:

Un peu comme marteau, gellatine, elastique et france

Ta gueule KEUBRUNE

calisse que vous chier pour rien

Simon je sais que Ard rock

ARD

calisse

DJ Backspin Backspin CUT OFFF