Windows 7
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Sun 19 Sep, 2010 @ 6:22pm |
 Coolness: 685540 | not being able to run 16 bit stuff still has absolutely NOTHING to do with your inability to LLF.
And not being able to name the app just makes you look like even more of an idiot. "Yeah, I know what I'm talking about, I just can't prove it to anyone because it's a secret, but trust me, I don't need to prove myself to you for you to know I'm right". Sounds just like people talking about god. Your facts are as valid as the proof you can provide. |
| I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Sun 19 Sep, 2010 @ 6:25pm |
 Coolness: 131545 | are you a mule ? read !!
one guy said on the above link i provided :: The thing is, it didn't have to be this hard. What ever happened to downward compatibility? This is just Microsoft making an executive decision to obsolete older apps so they can sell you new ones. There is no good reason to remove this function except greed on Microsoft's part. Unfortunately, this can be very painful for people that have built their businesses around using 16 bit app programs. In my case all my schematics for the last 15 years have been drawn on a 2 dimensional, 16 bit application program that won't run on Vista 64! Damn them! SO YEA IM SHURE WE ARE ALL FULL OF SHIT AND OUTTA GO VIRTUAL . DUDE YOUR NOT EVEN READING SO ENJOY YOUR CRAPPY OS AND DISTOPIAN FUTURE THAT GOES WITH IT . SOME PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO FIGHT THIS WAR NOT GIVE INTO IT and i named the stupid ap you idiotic moron . dsx is reg under govt.so good luck finding it |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Sun 19 Sep, 2010 @ 6:33pm |
| Coolness: 685540 | lol you're fucking hillarious.
Can't find anything on this DXF program, but the MHDD low level format stuff is NOT actual LLF, it's a zero-fill that then re-initializes the drive - it does NOT do a LLF. MHDD is the equivalent of doing dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/<destination partition> followed by a drive reinitialisation. EOF. |
| I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Kishmay_Pinas a répondu le Sun 19 Sep, 2010 @ 10:53pm |
 Coolness: 103205 | Oh oh watch out. Geek fight! |
| I'm feeling ez sessions monday wut! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» SourUltraFast a répondu le Sun 19 Sep, 2010 @ 11:06pm |
 Coolness: 91340 | Originally Posted By KISHMAY_PINAS
Oh oh watch out. Geek fight! It's called a Geek-Off I think. |
| I'm feeling kung fu biking right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Mon 20 Sep, 2010 @ 4:21am |
| Coolness: 131545 | no its called screwhead feels he has done it all
and want to hear himself talk . |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Mon 20 Sep, 2010 @ 4:32am |
| Coolness: 685540 | and again, despite your claiming that DSK does a LOW LEVEL FORMAT, it DOES NOT.
[ www.cbltech.ca ] Royal Canadian Mounted Police DSX Method
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police Technical Security Branch makes a tool, DSX, available to departments of the Canadian government intended to prevent information disclosure when serviceable hard disk media is removed from service. The CBL Data Shredder program emulates DSX’s method of clearing data, writing the bit pattern “00” on the first pass, “11” on the second, and a text pattern consisting of the software version number, and the data and time the erase took place. Wiping a drive with DSX is not method approved by the Canadian government for sanitising classified information. There are a TON of programs that do that, just google disk/file shredder. This has NOTHING to do with a LOW LEVEL FORMAT, in which you change the positions of the tracks and sectors on the hard disk, and write the control structures that define where the tracks and sectors are. The software you're talking about (DSX and MHDD) do NOT LLF - they fill the drive with a null bit to completely clear any and all data (but not to a point where the RCMP would use it for classified info, were they still to be using the program) |
| I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 4:30am |
 Coolness: 159070 | What's with the argument about an absent feature 0.000001 % of the average Win 7 would want to ever use in the first place ?
Let's all go back to wired rotary phones and telegraph already and call it a day. Note : I <3 Win 7 |
| I'm feeling [__insert emotion here__] right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» SourUltraFast a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 4:45am |
| Coolness: 91340 | My current workhorse is a mac and i'm really happy with it. Win XP was close to be a "bread and butter OS" but not as "no worries 'bout da system/lots'o' CPU powa" as OSX back then as i paid a tad moar for it (4 years ago).
For the few times I had to work on Win 7, I can say that it was a really smooth ride and I'd really consider it if i would to built a new D.A.W! For all the retro stuff, f..ck it! I'll put up an older box/whatever the best OS for the situation is/proper sound interface (RME teedlee dee!) and I'll be fine. Oh btw, have anyone here ever rode an RME based D.A.W on any LINUXish OS? I'd love to give that a go someday, read a few articles and forums threads leading me to the hardware and drivers solutions but not much really on the sequencer/DAWs aspects. |
| I'm feeling kung fu biking right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 11:44am |
| Coolness: 131545 | Originally Posted By SCREWHEAD
and again, despite your claiming that DSK does a LOW LEVEL FORMAT, it DOES NOT. [ www.cbltech.ca ] There are a TON of programs that do that, just google disk/file shredder. This has NOTHING to do with a LOW LEVEL FORMAT, in which you change the positions of the tracks and sectors on the hard disk, and write the control structures that define where the tracks and sectors are. The software you're talking about (DSX and MHDD) do NOT LLF - they fill the drive with a null bit to completely clear any and all data (but not to a point where the RCMP would use it for classified info, were they still to be using the program) man your an embarassment to yourself i hope you are aware of it. provide disk dump your just going copy pasta on something you never did imo. United States Department of Defence Standard 5220.22-M The National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, issued to the US Army, Navy, Air Force, and other US government agencies specifies standards for the clearing, and sanitising of data classified confidential, secret, and top secret. Under this standard, data may be cleared by writing any bit pattern to the entire disk once. Disks are sanitised by writing a different bit pattern to the disk on each of three passes. This is how the CBL Data Shredder program implements this standard. Drives containing top secret data are not permitted to be sanitised in this manner; they must be physically destroyed, or the disks subjected to degaussing, scrambling completely the magnetic patterns used to store data on the disk, rendering the drive itself inoperable. so stfu when you dont know what your taklking about asshead and again, despite your claiming that DSK does a LOW LEVEL FORMAT, it DOES NOT. DSX not DSK btw , and youre innanibility at focusing at noting else but a single example prooves to me your a proper seven zombie swine. DO PROVIDE PROOF , oh you cant cause your convo is all full of shit. marking you as UNC if your head wasnt stuck so fucking deep into your ass that it sticking out then you d read from start im talking about retrocomptatibility . somethine you have no experience on except on your fashion head trips weeks , whereas i have and for a fucking while and customers backing it up . now leggo ur eggo do go on and carry a conversation with yourself , its been a page now , even capt obvious is going facepalm on your innanibilities Mise À Jour » cutterhead a écrit sur Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 12:12pm mhdd and dsx , low level format , and claiming they dont is a fallacy.
what screwhead tried to act smart and failed is that he now thinks a lowlevel format can be done on top secret data by govt protocol . the REALITY IS a lowlevel format is the hardware most ereasing of data, most of the time done from a write protected user environement , everything TOP SECRET has to be DESTROYED TO NIL , AKA YOUU CANNOT RECYCLE THE DRIVE BUT BY MELTING IT IN A FOUNDRY. these are all govt standard. but all less sensible containing drive info , can be lowlevel , in order to have a near factory disk surface. anybody with two lights in his head will know the smart table isnt cleared during this process and could be used to carry info . but beside this the DRIVE IS LOWLEVELED WHEN MHDD OR DSX OR DBAN OR DD USING WHATEVER AS DATA. |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» GKiLLAZ a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 12:06pm |
 Coolness: 54740 | C'mon guys, the person was asking stuffs about 7 and you'r still fighting for technical problems that will cause problem to less than 1000 persons on the entire planet...
You wanna use DOS with Direct Acces menu, go ahead but Windows 7 still a good product for most of the users. By the way Windows Vista does a good job too, but need to be on services pack 2 with all the updates. |
| I'm feeling to be determined right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» MolocH a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 12:09pm |
 Coolness: 226225 | ^^^
What he said. Enuff with the pissing contest. :) |
| I'm feeling vicious right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 12:13pm |
| Coolness: 131545 | mhdd and dsx , low level format , and claiming they dont is a fallacy.
what screwhead tried to act smart and failed is that he now thinks a lowlevel format can be done on top secret data by govt protocol . the REALITY IS a lowlevel format is the hardware most ereasing of data, most of the time done from a write protected user environement , everything TOP SECRET has to be DESTROYED TO NIL , AKA YOUU CANNOT RECYCLE THE DRIVE BUT BY MELTING IT IN A FOUNDRY. these are all govt standard. but all less sensible containing drive info , can be lowlevel , in order to have a near factory disk surface. anybody with two lights in his head will know the smart table isnt cleared during this process and could be used to carry info . but beside this the DRIVE IS LOWLEVELED WHEN MHDD OR DSX OR DBAN OR DD USING WHATEVER AS DATA. and dont use "GUISE" stop rabling when the arse is clearly trolling , shure go ahead and jail the victims as well . i was clearly making a statement before you had screwshits going round on everything said . |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ufot a répondu le Tue 21 Sep, 2010 @ 12:22pm |
 Coolness: 93050 | Windows 7 is the best windows since Xp, extremely solid, zero bugs, very fast... I recommend the upgrade to anyone considering it.
Ufot-7 reasons to hate mac |
| I'm feeling happy as a panda with car troubl right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Wed 22 Sep, 2010 @ 2:51pm |
| Coolness: 131545 | its not zero bug. and its full of obfuscating analytics. |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» MolocH a répondu le Wed 22 Sep, 2010 @ 2:59pm |
| Coolness: 226225 | Originally Posted By CUTTERHEAD
its not zero bug. and its full of obfuscating analytics. But lets agree most users don't aren't really affected. And also, most end users aren't that paranoid about having the best kept system in the world. |
| I'm feeling vicious right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Wed 22 Sep, 2010 @ 3:11pm |
| Coolness: 131545 | yea but these mechanism are there to lure people into lawsuite or bug their computer if it detects misused dictated by them , so that if
[ www.laquadrature.net ] doesnt do shit and get enforced even after the implications people will lose even more freedom and will live an era of slapsuite and prison state by the erudited. and from the developper side . each time they hinder assembly and promote hi level language they only keep themself more in power and distance the normal users form attaining the ability to reconfigure and reshape the whole system as they see fit as it should normally be. USER WISE. not buisness wise. how come then there is more code in windows to see what gets in or out of the system , than actuall forein file system support , retrocompatibility , openess , statuquo. |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» MolocH a répondu le Wed 22 Sep, 2010 @ 3:17pm |
| Coolness: 226225 | I see your point, but most of the world dosen't give two shits about that.
Dude, people buy it. If you were in Microsoft's positio, you'd do the same. |
| I'm feeling vicious right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Wed 22 Sep, 2010 @ 3:18pm |
| Coolness: 131545 | no i wouldnt
okay , enjoy buyin the next versions for nothing then they dont buy it , the market is saturated by their monopoly , and same goes with mac apple or whatever they want to be named. compagnies put them UNTO the harddrives now, not cds , dvds or whatever they PRECONFIGURE THEM WITH IT. its a stategic move that nobody wants to stop but will soon fuck them i can assure you that , unless you still want to rebuy your whole system 128479785 times before you die when it will always do the same shit. millions of other compagny out there, shure ms will push this malware , people dont even care looking up alternatives , that is if they arent zombified into thinking only ms of mac can run a computer ... recoil is hindered into using an old app , solely because that perticular function was made so , that the old computer pool will be forced to buy anew, but the code is still fucntionnal in the machine , its the os thats hindering it. see |
| I'm feeling "god is(i)n`the tv" right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» MolocH a répondu le Wed 22 Sep, 2010 @ 3:25pm |
| Coolness: 226225 | Originally Posted By CUTTERHEAD
okay , enjoy buyin the next versions for nothing then Dude, first, I don't buy os's. I'm upfront about that. And I'm also not following trend. if it werks for me good. That's the end of my expectations. I have a fully functionnal system. I also like my life because well, it's not based on my pc. And about corporations making a buck by beeing proprietors of their product, well, I have no problem with that. It's kinda like beeing okay with an organism breathing and eating, and ultimately taking a shit I have to step in on my way to work. It's the nature of things. Besides, these corporations are the one that innovated enough over the years to assure that this kind of technology is available to you. THEY financed research. The minute you enable technology, you gots dibs on the money making. It's just plain logic innit? Imagine what you'd be doing right now if these companies didn't invest in research. You's still be playing tapper on a 8086 @ 1.2 Mhz coupled with 256K of ram. |
| I'm feeling vicious right now.. | |
Windows 7
[ Haut de la page ] |
Poster Une Réponse |
Vous devez être connecté pour soumettre une réponse.
[ Haut de la page ] |
