Your Nightlife Network

prrr's Profile - Community Messages

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 3:47pm. Posted in Critisize! (constructively)!.


Coolness: 43635	Lol Noah! Ew!

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 3:43pm. Posted in polyamoury.


Coolness: 43635	Alright then :) How about saying "I don't agree with your analogy" instead of name-calling. IMO that's the more mature thing to do. Thanks!

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 3:20pm. Posted in polyamoury.

Coolness: 43635

Meh. I never meant to make anyone upset with it. I meant that, biologically, men have the urge to be with *more* women and spread themselves. It doesn't mean that women aren't capable of wanting to be with more than one also, but it's not as common.

From all the people I've listened to about it, my impression is that there are more men who want open relationships than women. And, sex is FAR more easy to get for women than it is for men. Because men seek it out more. I thought this was commonly acknowledged?

So assuming that men and women are equally honest and dishonest, given that men in general have more natural desire to have multiple partners, it makes sense that there would be more men cheating than women. But! It's completely irrelevant! Such a big deal was made out of nothing! I don't care to argue about this, I'm not pointing fingers at anyone or bashing any gender. Women in general aren't as good as men at lifting weights and playing chess. So what? Does that make me anti-women because I acknowledge it? Does it mean that all women are bad at lifting weights and playing chess, or that they don't have other talents? No..

Music's a very important thing for me, I wasn't asking to be bashed over using it to explain how I feel. I see the relation between them in the ways that it matters for the purpose of this conversation so I used it to show how I can like A and B at the same time and that one can even help me with my appreciation for the other. There's no need for you to be so hostile as there wasn't any hostility in the first place.

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 1:45pm. Posted in Im looking for site like Ektoplazm.


Coolness: 43635	Mmmmmektoplazm :)

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 1:44pm. Posted in polyamoury.


Coolness: 43635	I don't hate men, I love them, that's why I want them to be free :P It should be equal though and I should be free too. You can have romantic love in an open relationship, why not? I know open couples who are super romantic!

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 1:41pm. Posted in polyamoury.

Coolness: 43635

Marriage is traditionally an ownership-of-women type thing (even if it's more equal today, in this country). So shoot me for being the bearer of bad news, lol. But women trying to control their men, who don't want to be monogamous, it backfires because many men are NOT going to only be with them (though SOME will be honestly monogamous for sure, don't misread what I'm saying). They just won't know about it but it still happens.

You're fooling yourselves if you don't think that men cheat more than women or that men don't seek sex more than women. Some women are really into sex, yes. Some women are dishonest too, and some women cheat. But men are, since the dawn of our species, more desiring to spread their seed to as many women as possible.

I never said women don't cheat, of course they do but they do it less. They're more easy to manipulate into thinking they're part of a monogamous relationship.

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 1:32pm. Posted in polyamoury.

Coolness: 43635

I'm not anti-men at all. Just stating a fact. The sex industry wouldn't cater almost exclusively to men, many/most of who are doing it without their partners' permissions, if it wasn't.

I did say MANY. Not all. I was not over-generalizing. Are you saying that many men DON'T cheat? Either women are better at hiding it, or men cheat more than women. It would make sense biologically too, wouldn't it?

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 1:18pm. Posted in polyamoury.

Coolness: 43635

There's a difference between posessive and protective. I could be protecting them for myself, or protecting them for *them*. If I love someone I want what's good for them.

Poly doesn't mean sex with tons of different people necessarily. Some non-mono people have less sex partners than mono people. Some have it with more. Some have casual sex, some don't. I like to get to know someone for a while before having sex with them, but some monogamous people like to have sex on the fist date. To each their own, everyone is different.

Sex with the same person gets better over time, but that doesn't have anything at all to do with monogamy and non-monogamy. You can have a longterm non-monogamous thing.

Many if not most men cheat (I know women do too but it's mostly men) but openly, they have the luxury of benefitting from multiple partners without cheating and breaking the bond of trust with their primary partner(s).

Jimi Hendrix and Loreena McKennit both give me something completely different from each other with their music. But they're both perfect to me in their own ways. I'm not going to only listen to one of them and then feel guilty when I feel like experiencing the other too. What if music artists asked that you ONLY listen to them and nobody else? Wouldn't that be unreasonable?

If I never listened to anyone else but Hendrix, even if it's my favorite music ever, I'd be missing out. I don't *need* to listen to anything else, but it would be good for me and I'd enjoy Hendrix even more the next time I listened to him.

Even if you love your partner and want to be with them for the rest of your life, after 1, 5, 10 years it could be good for both partners and their relationship to put some other music into the mix, with each others' knowledge, instead of keeping each other as posessions and cheating on each other or letting go of other great intimate connections.

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 31, 2011 @ 12:38pm. Posted in polyamoury.

Coolness: 43635

It doesn't mean that you're having sex with many, though it could be. You can have sex with as many or as few people as you like. The point of it (for me) is not closing the door to potential very special connections and not restricting my partner because it makes no sense to me and I don't know what jealousy feels like. If my partner could benefit from an emotional or sexual connection with someone else too then I'd encourage it for their good.

My first open relationship bf was encouraging about it,. As I don't often find someone I want to be intimate with, when I finally did he was really happy for me. I thought it was sweet and I was REALLY impressed by him for it.

Being territorial is often mistaken for being protective. I'm protective of my partners too but not possessive. I wouldn't protect them for ME,

Though if someone else wanted to have sex with a lot of people either at the same time (open/poly) or in a row (monogamous) then I'm not going to judge them badly for it as long as they're being safe about it and not putting the rest of us at risk.

I agree sex with the same person gets better over time, that's what I've experiences in longterm relationships. But that doesn't have anything at all to do with polyamory and open relationships. You can have a long term serious open relationship with someone for a long time, or be serious with or being intimate with the same few people for a long time. Polyamory doesn't necessarily mean that you're having sex with everyone, not that there's anything wrong with that either. Everyone is different. As long as they take care with each others' feelings and try to keep sane about their own feelings, it's all good!

» prrr replied on Sat Jan 29, 2011 @ 12:49pm. Posted in Hardcore vs Heavy Dark Psy Trance.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By RECOIL
example? and what kind of instruments would they be using?

all sorts of instruments, harps, classical guitars, maybe sitars, hand drums, hurdy gurdies, dobros, lutes, flutes, stand-up basses, singing, ? Blended with electronica maybe? There was a brilliant opening of a party I saw once with a live electronica set blended with a lady playing a koto (japanese floor harp) before it got into heavier electronica later on. So great to open the night like that! The harp and flute and other performances at the opening of Psymind was so cool too!

Originally Posted By moloch
Seriously, you know you can always stay home and be judgemental by yourself on that night right?

I wasn't being judgmental against HHC or anyone who listens to it, I just didn't think it matches with the other genres in that list/room. It would fit better in a room with other styless IMO. You're just looking for any reason to pick me apart.. maybe I should remind you again to leave me alone. I'll go to whatever parties I want, thank you very much.

» prrr replied on Sat Jan 29, 2011 @ 12:35pm. Posted in polyamoury.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By RAISINLOVE
Also, it seems to be vastly more popular to cheat on someone than to agree on an open relationship. At least with the open relationship, both agree to it and are equals. Cheaters are cowards who want the extra options but can't deal with their mate having the same privileges.

That's a really good argument for non-monogamy. It's normal and perfectly healthy for one or both partners to desire either physical or emotional connection with others outside the primary relationship. I don't think that claiming to be in a monogamoous relationship stops that, it just creates guilty feelings or dishonesty or missed opportunities to form a nice connection with someone else.

But it's important to be open and have good communication with your partner about where the boundaries are if you have them, and to practice safe sex or safe sex with anyone else outside the relationship.

It still requires trust like any other relationship, it's just a bit more freedom which could be really nice to share with your partner.

I once told a bf at the start of our relationship that he could be with other girls too if he liked, that I'm not jealous and it's all good. Either he didn't believe me, or the most likely case - he just wanted to have sex with someone else but didn't want ME to have that freedom too. So he chose "monogamy" but kept me basically as a prisoner/owned object reserved only for him while he was out there benefitting from more freedom himself. I know that this is the case with a lot more relationships than it appears.

So now I'm really skeptical of monogamy.

Being in a non-monogamous relationship doesn't mean that you're out there fucking the whole world. It can just mean that you have more feedom to make other special connections in whatever capacity, and the ability to communicate openly your partner about it and without destroying the primary relationship.

» prrr replied on Thu Jan 27, 2011 @ 12:41am. Posted in Hardcore vs Heavy Dark Psy Trance.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By YOSHIN
or make a concept, one room excessively dark, and one excessively light...
1. hardcore, gabber, horror psy, etc...
2. uplifting goa, morning psy, happy hardcore, etc...
has that one been done before?

I like! Though I don't think HHC goes with morning psy and goa :p

Both hardcore and psycore can be great, like Jimi Hendrix and Loreena McKennit, they're differnt from one another but have a few things in common and are both perfect for different reasons. The genres are so broad that each producer has the opportunity to do their own thing with it. As long as it makes me feel.

The party could have one room even but with a lineup like:

* medieval folk music
* deep slow psy like Asura etc
* deeper harder psy but not full-on or psycore
* psycore
* psychedelic breakcore
* breakcore
* hardcore
* slower weirder more evil hardcore
* happy melodic morning music with the last song being breakcore

» prrr replied on Thu Jan 27, 2011 @ 12:33am. Posted in Psystep scene?.


Coolness: 43635	Some of Adham Sheikh's stuff? :)

» prrr replied on Thu Jan 27, 2011 @ 12:15am. Posted in best parties of 2010.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By JAMESBROWN
Oh! What if there was also an acoustic stage for folk and death metal?!?!?!!1

Hell yeah! Especially if it's symphonic death metal, and medieval acoustic folk music!! :D

Originally Posted By aliceinacidland
And I guess it's not really necessary, if you have enough people that can work together to transform spaces..

But I LOVE seeing the deco artist's paintings on the walls. We just need more of them. I'd never seen the ones at SOMA before, and those were outstanding and edible, everyone agreed. It just costs money to bring in artists. But art should be supported and encouraged IMO. It's something to write home about too, we didn't have art like that in AB in general. Partying in a really great art gallery is just awesome.

Update » prrr wrote on Thu Jan 27, 2011 @ 12:22am

I made a lot of jewelry like that before, Lita :) we should get creative and make some stuff together. Or at least you can take over some of my old gear.

» prrr replied on Wed Jan 26, 2011 @ 10:07pm. Posted in Psypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsypsy.

Coolness: 43635

...MAKE A WISH AND SCROLL DOWN! Then send it to 10 of your friends in the next hour, or else!!
K ready now GO!

Originally Posted By BR34TH3
PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 26, 2011 @ 10:08pm

PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY PSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPS YPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYP SYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSYPSY

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 26, 2011 @ 10:08pm

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 26, 2011 @ 10:09pm

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 26, 2011 @ 10:10pm

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 26, 2011 @ 10:11pm

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 24, 2011 @ 6:05pm. Posted in le thread qui parle pas de PSY.


Coolness: 43635

» prrr replied on Sun Jan 23, 2011 @ 6:05pm. Posted in genres you want to hear.


Coolness: 43635	Elecnotechnotronica

» prrr replied on Sun Jan 23, 2011 @ 10:33am. Posted in best parties of 2010.


Coolness: 43635	4 rooms - 4th room darkbient :)

» prrr replied on Fri Jan 21, 2011 @ 2:06pm. Posted in Black Magik III.


Coolness: 43635	Next time I should bring a bunch of Glyde condoms to give out :P lol.

» prrr replied on Fri Jan 21, 2011 @ 1:16pm. Posted in Salvia 20x.


Coolness: 43635	Salvia isn't something that anyone can "handle", it's really meant to be experienced under the watch of someone you can trust to take care of you for a few minutes.

» prrr replied on Fri Jan 21, 2011 @ 1:11pm. Posted in genres you want to hear.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By SLUGBAIT
I support this message.

I have some pretty good Dark Ambient. :3

Feed me!!! :)

One room with breakcore, "IDM", glitch, darkpsy and hardcore and things we can't quite classify, and the other room with downtempo psIDM and melodic dark ambient things. A medieval folk group or singer-songwriter on classical instruments and then a dark symphonic operatic metal band could open the first room.

» prrr replied on Thu Jan 20, 2011 @ 1:35am. Posted in Salvia 20x.

Coolness: 43635

Don't ever burn inecense without someone else there to take care of you while you're doing so.

It can be burned in a waterpipe or bong and all at once until you not only can't recall your name but don't understand the concept of names or the letters that make up the word altogether, especially until letters both do and don't exist anyways and all is geometic sound that tastes like sensual colours.

I believe it's still legal.

» prrr replied on Wed Jan 19, 2011 @ 8:50pm. Posted in best parties of 2010.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By RAVEDAVE
lately all i see on ravewave is about the vibe and psy and everythings turned into bad and good and karma and drugs and intrance moments thanks to the psy...

WHY

Even though I love a lot of types of music, I've been drawn towards the psy scene specifically in Montreal because I feel.. for lack of better words, loved and cherished, like people are actively pouring it into me. Maybe they're not necessarily nicer than people at other sorts of shindigs but just less shy with affection. So it's easier for me to open up there. I'm not bashing other parties or genres at all, just reflecting on my own experiences of where I've been made to feel the most welcome.

Some of the most special and peace/love nights of my life were hardcore and breakcore events though. I just haven't been to many since I moved here!

As for my top favorite parties of this year, Openmind, Psymind, Spore - all of these parties have a variety of music, not just psy. Psymind opened with a beautiful harpist for crying out loud, an it was a different type of psy than usual. Openmind had reggae bands and things that you just can't classify, and Spore had 2 great and contrasting rooms.

***We're so lucky in Montreal to have all this variety and we should appreciat it. It's like paradise here.

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 19, 2011 @ 8:52pm

Harvest festival was another world too, that was great!!! Really something different.

Update » prrr wrote on Wed Jan 19, 2011 @ 8:53pm

p.s. Harvest was not as peace-love-ish but still very exciting and welcoming.

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 2:07pm. Posted in Salvia 20x.


Coolness: 43635	I prefer to burn it only once and not 2-3 times for my throat. And for it to be as stong as possible. That's the only reason. But I do know how kthx :)

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 2:03pm. Posted in Salvia 20x.


Coolness: 43635	hahahah ;) It's OK he didn't want my gift either. He also turned out to be an aggressive, delusional asshole when he didn't get what he wanted. Sooooooo.... anyhoo..

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 1:58pm. Posted in best parties of 2010.


Coolness: 43635	That's OK, everyone's allowed to have different prefered styles :) Anyways isn't this thread supposed to be about our favorite parties of the year, not which ones we hated?

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 10:09am. Posted in the paparazzi.


Coolness: 43635	:/ That's bad about the movie/name. Noah could you take down pics of people that they don't want posted?

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 9:33am. Posted in Salvia 20x.


Coolness: 43635	I did, but they insisted. I don't care if they read it. Point is someone else can use and enjoy it and I don't want it to go to waste. I didn't mean any negativity from it. Seriously leave me alone already.

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 9:31am. Posted in the paparazzi.


Coolness: 43635	Originally Posted By RAISINLOVE Read through the thread, apparently some people have confronted him and he ignored their requests. It's 22 pages long, lol sorry about that. Group together and ask him all at once in person at a party maybe :P Or ask Noah to take them down? Sorry just trying to help.

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 9:19am. Posted in best parties of 2010.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By MOLOCH
How about you just read the god damn thread before you spew your nonsence.

Sorry.

Originally Posted By molochWe're just a little fucking annoyed at leelte psy-kids saying "Best parties are the parties without hardcore." The psy scene is always going around preachin Ohm, pEace, acceptance, respect and all that shit, yet, the go and diss any other genre they can get their little hands on.

Holy overgeneralization. Maybe I've been living under a rock but a lot of other psy fans including myself really like a lot of other genres too and we don't go around dissing other genres. I think that's a minority of psy-ers who do that. I've also never said the best parties are the parties without hardcore, actually my last post which you insulted when all I had was positive intentions, clearly said that I LOVE parties with hardcore. I know of other psytrancers who think so too. Either way everyone is allowed to love whatever genre they love and shouldn't get shit from you because of it.

Nobody is attacking you and your (/our!) music and if they are, it's not the fault of the rest of the psy scene for you to take it out on us.

Have you ever heard of Ressurrection parties, they were/are the most awesome parties, hardcore industrial and it was a big special deal for all the psy people and everyone else who liked hardcore to work together on them, go to them and celebrate it. So please spare me the "psy people hate hardcore parties" .. LOL.

Maybe just in Montreal they're scared off by the anti-psy attitude. I sure as hell don't feel as driven to encourage the hardcore scene here if you're against me for enjoying and encouraging psy too. Is your attitude the majority or the minority? I don't want to go to a hardcore party if I'll be disrespected for being into psy. I can listen to my hardcore at home instead if that's the case and so can everyone else who loves hardcore but doesn't want to deal with that.

Originally Posted By molochpErsonally, I vote for Karma to give some psy promoter a swift kick in the butt. And I kinda have a feeling it's in the mail.

These people make parties because it makes themselves and others happy, not for the sake of personally harming you. So I don't think any violent kama is what they deserve.

Originally Posted By molochGet with the times, The way i see it, A really good friend of mine brocke his back to give what was left of the hardcore community a night out, on tuesdays, you know, so he would not mess up the other peoples event. Being all nice and shit. And Next thing you know, Psy kids started trhowing a night ON FRIGGIN' TUESDAYS, like there's no other day for them to suck their attendees dry. And it's not like they give themselves the trouble of booking headliners. SO, they just have to go out and make a weekly event in direct competition with Nate's night. Who was trying to stay out of the way.

Again there are a lot of people in the psy scene, not only the few who put on that night. And, it probably wasn't a malicious thing to mess up YOU and hardcore nights. I wasn't there, I don't know, but I doubt competing with you was their intent. If I was an artist I'd take what a bar would give me, if it's Tuesday or Wednesday etc. Maybe Tuesday was what they were offered. Maybe they didn't have Nate's event in mind at all when they set it up! There are electronica nights anyways every night of the week, aren't there? If they chose Thursdays instead of Tuesdays maybe someone else would be pissed that they "stole their night". Sometimes I go to live rock shows instead of electronica parties. Sometimes I go to a jam instead of a potluck. THAT'S MONTREAL. There's always one, ten, twenty things going on at the same time.

I'm sorry about Nate's night having to endure that competition, really. But all artists deal with that at some point. Psy parties and festivals deal with it all the time too. It's nothing malicious, just different people throwing their events that unfortunately fall at the same time because so many events go on all the time here. Black Magik has been going on for years now and falls at the same time as Igloofest. Them's the breaks!

Maybe I'm being naively peace/love but promoters talking about it together could help. It would be in the best interest of the psy scene too if it was on a different night from whoever gives the most competition.

Originally Posted By MOLOCH
Thanks for nothing.

You're welcome.

Update » prrr wrote on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 9:26am

I guess you forgot about Yoshin's post too. How about, we go around the boards and come up with all the posts we can find, to see how many psy-loving posters diss hardcore and hardcore parties, and how many are positive towards them instead. Otherwise stp keep your mouth shut with your overgeneralisations that just cause more animosity between the scenes.

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 8:34am. Posted in Salvia 20x.


Coolness: 43635	I have some incense that was gifted to me, unfortunately I like my incense a little stronger. If anyone would like one, it's still in its original package. Thanks!

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 8:23am. Posted in the paparazzi.

Coolness: 43635

Isn't Bal en Blanc was supposed to be a big semi-clothed orgy? More like a giant club night than a rave? So he wasn't being out of line. Nobodies stopping those ladies from going to raves instead of clubs and after-hours if they want something different :p

Have you guys talked to him about your concerns in person before posting here? Sometimes that works better than dragging someone through the mud over the internet.

I can't speak for everyone else's experiences with Antonino but he's always been really nice to me, and not in a creepy way, and I get the impression that he'd be just as nice to me if he didn't think I was cute since I've never seen him be anything but friendly towards anyone else. Even once he came up and started taking a video or pics of me spinning poi and I messed up and asked him to please delete it, and he did. I think I just asked nicely. Sorry if that didn't work for others but it worked for me.

Update » prrr wrote on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 8:25am

What I tried to say it, please be nice and if you have issues with him, IMO it's best to deal with it in person instead of dragging it through the mud on the net. I think it's also probably very embarassing for the girls in those photos you're reposting, to put them up again with captions.

Update » prrr wrote on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 8:26am

Holy typos, sorry for that ^.^

» prrr replied on Tue Jan 18, 2011 @ 8:02am. Posted in best parties of 2010.

Coolness: 43635

Black Magik was just wonderful. It was a pefect night for me. The only thing that would have made it more than perfect would be an attached chill room with some downtempo melodic IDM type stuff.

I love variety too but I find lots of variety in the psy scene (could always be more).

If you want more hardcore parties, then MAKE them. Nobody is stopping you from throwing a party. It takes investments of time, money and effort but if you really want it you can make it happen! There would be people to help for sure, I'd help if you want.

I miss parties like we threw in Calgary where there were all sorts of music on the same night, and pretty much everyone loved and appreciated all sorts of electronica. The same people would dance to the hardcore set as to the psytrance and the downtempo and the breakcore and the dubstep and etc. Those were the days! But it only happened because the scene is so small and hampered by the government in Alberta that we had to come together like that and mesh it all into one party, otherwise the scene wouldn't be able to exist at all.

Something I miss at parties that are not psytrance is the artwork. I go to psy parties because it's all there for me - wonderful art, music, and everyone is so NICE. It would be more enticing to me to go to a hardcore party for example, if there was some intense artwork and deco. The psy scene took me over in Montreal because of the atmosphere.

Openmind should be amazing this year, last year there was a great variety of music, not only psytrance (and the psychedelic electronica there was was varied, IMO) and this year should be even more. Even acoustic music ;) With instruments and stuff... really looking forward to it.

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 17, 2011 @ 3:32am. Posted in RAVE NEWS! Canadian Rave Scene Articles!.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By NUCLEAR
RAVE NEWS - DECEMBER 22ND

FIRE IN THE SKY

This fifteen year old scamp ran away from home years ago and now spends most of his time hanging out with a crew of cocaine loving rave fiends. His background is tragic and has left him with an eat or be eaten mentality. At some point during the last two years, he had a brutal encounter with a couple of power tripping officers. Apparently, the boy was sleeping in an alleyway and the officers decided to pick on him for loitering, when he didn't treat them with the kind of reverence they felt they deserved, they began to beat on the boy. Ever since that attack, he's been hell bent on getting his revenge.

He fell in with the coke head, who introduced him to the world of prostitution. He started turning tricks for money, and what he doesn't spend on drugs and the necessities of life, he spends on fireworks that one of his johns, a frequent traveler, picks up for him in the states. The boy now has a large stock pile of fiery pyrotechnics, which he has been using to annoy his enemies in blue for the last three months.

Our wily teenager fancies himself a regular freedom fighter, though in practice he's more Home Alone than Che Guevera. He has yet to hurt anyone with his crazy antics, and from what sources say, he doesn't plan on changing that anytime soon. His goal is to harass the police, not hurt them.

He taught himself how to build time detonators by watching some videos on youtube. This knowledge has allowed him to build and deploy over half a dozen fake bombs -- basically just fireworks rigged to light up at a time of his choosing. The teenager usually hides his fiery babies in remote, hard to reach places. He plasters the walls with anti-police propaganda, then calls in a bomb threat. Locations have included the top of a water tower, the roof of an abandoned building, and a sewer in Point St-Charles.

The police have no choice but to show up and remove his devices. He's effectively gumming up their work, forcing them to spend their time on his pranks. The boy wants the police to feel as powerless as they made him feel, and controlling what they spend their time working on seems to be an effective means of doing that. He doesn't seem all that concerned about getting caught, but given his age, he'll probably get off lightly even if the police do catch him.

Wow this is a truly outstanding piece of literature.

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 17, 2011 @ 3:08am. Posted in Black Magik III.

Coolness: 43635

What KORHAL said! +100000000

Thanks so much. So much music and art and good vibes shared. Thank you Lita. Thanks for clean air. Thanks for making a scene where people are wild enough to dance like crazy space aliens but mature enough not to get into fights and steal. Thanks for the friendly security, morning sunglasses, and the after party, sorry I was too sleepy at that point but thanks very much :)

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 10, 2011 @ 1:25am. Posted in Psy DJ for Sunrise.

Coolness: 43635

Oh I know, I was just watching Q'Elf last night, what a coincidence!! So great!

Yes Nystagmus, for his harder stuff. The songs are very sticky. So lucky to see the live sets.

Update » prrr wrote on Mon Jan 10, 2011 @ 1:29am

And Byron Dreamweaver, I don't know what he's up to these days but when I was living out west he put on the most amazing downtempo parties and did the Seed of Life stage at Shambles festival which, I think it was in the summer of 2006, was very inspirational and the nicest deco for a chill room ever seen.

» prrr replied on Mon Jan 10, 2011 @ 12:59am. Posted in Psy DJ for Sunrise.

Coolness: 43635

Living-Stone is great. There's also Anahata from Vancouver/Calgary (I know, not local but if he can be here sometime that would be something else). He produces a variety of really great and unique psy from weirder harder dancy to medium and spacey to sweet melodic downtempo. It's easy to dance to even though it's softer. His live is even better than his CDs IMO but the last time he was here was a couple years ago at Space :/

I miss chill rooms! Parties I went to out west had some of the most beautifil downtempo rooms and it balanced everything really well. Not just a smoke room with downtempo, a real beautiful decorated space for enjoying the music and relaxing together. I miss cuddle puddes too XD

» prrr replied on Sun Jan 9, 2011 @ 2:52am. Posted in Psy DJ for Sunrise.


Coolness: 43635	get Asura to play another set live from across the ocean!! <3 Or Simon, please get Simon Ears! <3

» prrr replied on Sun Jan 9, 2011 @ 2:47am. Posted in A Curious Outsider.

Coolness: 43635

Originally Posted By SCREWHEAD
Welcome aboard!

Circus is to raves what a Big Mac is to a home-cooked Fillet Mignon dinner - it's just the mass-marketed, easily-accessible, socially-acceptable place to go do drugs and hang around with "beautiful people". The music they play in there, while good (if you're into that) is pretty much the watered-down pop-music equivalent of electronic music. To keep with the comparison-style from before, what you hear at Circus as opposed to a rave is the equivalent of going to see a Backstreet Boys cover band when you've got an opportunity to see Led Zeppelin.

Raves can be dirty (they're generally not always that clean), but it's about a lot more than just looking good and trying to hook up with every hot girl you see while showing off your muscles - it's about making friends and meeting people who are passionate about music.. Passionate enough to seek out the events that aren't mass-advertised and corporate-sponsored like a night out at Circus..

And yeah, a lot of people go to get totally fucked on drugs, a lot go to dance all night, some go to socialize, some go to listen to music.. The key thing though is the passion for the non-standard and for looking for an experience that's beyond the pre-canned, pre-packaged garbage you can pick up at the local supermarket.

For the music, there's a ton of different stuff, from Dubstep to DnB to Hardcore to Psytrance to Hardstyle.. There's a ton of amazing DJs in each style in the city.

ROFL I can't believe I completely agree with Screwhead for once.

There are lots of sober ravers. I'm always sober and I've been going to all sorts of raves for almost 10 years now! Nobody will judge you badly for being sober or on drugs (as long as it's not causing you to start shit with anyone). You can wear whatever you like.

The only real code of conduct at a rave is not to be mean to anyone, not to fight over anything, and to be respectful of the females. At clubs while it's more of a grinding hook-up market, raves are there for the party itself! You'll meet a lot of interesting people and there is often great artwork to enjoy and a variety of music. The most intense and amazing times are usually in the summer at outdoor parties in the forest. Imagine camping for a few days in a beautiful spot, dancing on a beach with fire and black light decorations the jumping into the river in the sunshine with awesome electronic music and smoothies!

A lot of the time when people always party with drugs, when they stop doing drugs they stop partying since they associate the two together. It's not a rule but it happens often. You can have great experiences with and without drugs but be careful which ones you do and how much you do it. If you appreciate the party and the music with and without drugs, then if (just if, one day) you get tired of drugs then you can keep enjoying going to parties anyways :D

» prrr replied on Sun Jan 9, 2011 @ 2:24am. Posted in a les mauvaise langue.


Coolness: 43635	Si quelqu'un anglo essaié d'ecrire en français, on faut lui encouragée ^.^

prrr's Profile - Community Messages

[ Top Of Page ]