Format Windows 7
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 1:10pm |
 Coolness: 159130 | Originally Posted By FATAL
right click on the executable file of the app ur launching and go to PROPERTIES .. then COMPATIBILITY tab .. then check "Run this program in compatibility mode for:" (I use win XP SP3 for best results) final step is to check the "Run this program as an admin" at the bottom cause some apps wont load .dll files if ur not allowed (even tho ur are admin on this computer .. stupid architecture dont ask..) NOICE ! Thanks for that. Will explore this further when I get home. Is it normal to feel like XP's getting archaic by the minute ? |
| I'm feeling jamaican right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 1:52pm |
 Coolness: 2603995 | It is... I don't know why anyone uses XP anymore. XP came out in 2001... It's 2009 now, almost 2010... That means XP is almost 9 years old... Would you use a computer which was 9 years old? Would you use an operating system which is 9 years old?
XP is 2001 Vista is 2006 7 is 2009 Get with the times... |
| I'm feeling nuclear right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 1:56pm |
 Coolness: 685600 | ^^AMEN to that
And, funny enough, on my old 9 year old computer, Win7 ran faster than a fresh install of XP! Only problem was no drivers for my old nForce chipset, but that's not much of a surprise, nVidia dropped support for nForce 3 like a year after I got my computer.. Update » Screwhead wrote on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 1:58pm ok, no, 7 year old computer, the AMD XP 2200+ chips came out june 2002.. |
| I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» FUCKERS replied on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 1:58pm |
 Coolness: 89750 | my pc is 6years old and im running 7 better and faster then winxp |
| I'm feeling porny right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 2:06pm |
| Coolness: 2603995 | If I used a computer system which was older then 2 years I'd go crazy. Anything less then a Core 2 Duo 3.0 with 4gigs of RAM should not be run. Just wait till SSD's become more affordable. They make your computer run 10x faster. No joke. It's really not that expensive to upgrade a computer these days compared to years before.
Motherboard 1333 FSB = 70$ including on-board video card (which works fine). Case = 45$ for a standard case with power supply. Core 2 Duo 3.0 = 167.99$ (most expensive part, from newegg free shipping) 4 Gigs RAM 800Mhz = 79$ Comes out to less then 400$ and you get yourself a power machine. Try to sell your old crap to someone who does not know for 200$ and then for 200$ you got yourself a power machine... The object is to keep upgrading every 2 years for 200$... That is 100$/year for awesome speed all the time. And some people probably don't even need a new case!!! Which makes things even cheaper!!! |
| I'm feeling nuclear right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ravedave replied on Fri Nov 20, 2009 @ 3:59pm |
 Coolness: 131700 | if booting skips the cd and goes to win7, even tho u set it as first boot device, try putting disabled to all the rest of the Boot options, and leave CD for the first, if it still doesnt work then somethings def wrong with ur cd |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 1:56am |
 Coolness: 131605 | Originally Posted By NUCLEAR
It is... I don't know why anyone uses XP anymore. XP came out in 2001... It's 2009 now, almost 2010... That means XP is almost 9 years old... Would you use a computer which was 9 years old? Would you use an operating system which is 9 years old? XP is 2001 Vista is 2006 7 is 2009 Get with the times... unix / ip has been used more than 40 y old now space shuttles where lunch in space for +20 y dont think now is better than then |
| I'm feeling tarfu right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:10am |
| Coolness: 2603995 | But still there are new version of the linux kernel all the time... Wouldn't you prefer to use the newest one? |
| I'm feeling nuclear right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 9:38am |
| Coolness: 159130 | Why ? Windows 3.1 works fine for me. LOL. |
| I'm feeling jamaican right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» GKiLLAZ replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 11:06am |
 Coolness: 54800 | Originally Posted By KEVIN_FLYNN
Why ? Windows 3.1 works fine for me. LOL. lol -------------------------------------------------------- A small word about XP On the last Intel Tradeshow (ICC) in Montreal (Dorval), Microsoft Canada Team Leader, confirm the fact that Windows XP will be no longer support after December 31th 2009 for end user. Companies will get 2 more years of support, except if they paid for a support plan (DEC 2013~2014). [ www.microsoft.com ] For all people who don't know that much computer, they better go to a newer version. All the others, do what you want ;) -------------------------------------------------------- By the way, did he fix is boot problem ? Update » GKiLLAZ wrote on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 12:23pm Un petit détail, certain ordi de marque (Acer, Asus, Compaq, HP, etc..) vont empêcher le boot sur un disque si le système installé semble plus récent que celui sur le disque inséré.
À ce moment il faut faire l'option F12 / F10 / F8 - Le boot menu et sélectionner le lecteur optique 
Sur cette image le F12 Par contre sur certains comme les Acer, il faut activé cette option de boot menu [ Enabled ]  |
| I'm feeling none right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 1:40pm |
| Coolness: 131605 | Originally Posted By GKILLAZ
For all people who don't know that much computer, they better go to a newer version. you dont seem to know much about assembly and its worth compare to hi level languages are worth shit for all i care, assembly language (80x86line, pentium, 64) still works the same but with extensions to newer hardware (128/256 float, loadsharing/superscaling interation, buffer&string size, etc...) being a bsd user for a deccade i can assert that your living a lie. microsoft is NOT reliable. yeap youll enjoy your new hardware blabla, but your os isnt even fully optimised since its more prone on lurking users history & DRMs than actual developpers helping users develop. if it wasnt for the *nix community , the open source one , not the sco type, youd have an end user terminal screen , keyboard & mice only , and your files and os and drives would lie @ the isp's location. |
| I'm feeling tarfu right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» GKiLLAZ replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 7:19pm |
| Coolness: 54800 | Originally Posted By CUTTERHEAD
blablabla You'r comments meen nothing for 99.9% of the person who read this, we don't care about all the thing you'r talking. I answered to someone, you don't like, just skip what I wrote then. Sorry cutterhead, but if you know something, maybe the only thing you know is how to get people rid of you ! |
| I'm feeling none right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:19pm |
| Coolness: 131605 | Update » cutterhead wrote on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:43pm OP ASKED TO FORMAT TO WITCH I REPLIED LOWLEVEL.
THEN I READ YOUR NEVERENDING STORY OF HOW XP ISNT SUPPORTED AND HOW THIS HAS TO DO WITH WINDOWS 7 BEING FORMATED ON TOP MOST STATEMENT YOU HAVE ARE BACKED ONLY BY THE FACT THAT YOUR CADDLE FARM YOU CALL USERS CANNOT CODE FOR SHIT AND ARE TO STUPID TO LURKMOAR YET WANT THE WHOLE THING TO WORK BY MAGIC. EXPLAIN HOW SEVEN PASSES ASSEMBLY IN A MORE MAGICAL WAY THAN LINUX OR PREVIOUS SYSTEM AND ALSO HOW AND WHY WASNT IT POSSIBLE TO CHANGE THEIR OLD SOURCES TO BE RETROCOMPATIBLE AND TO BE PORTED THE SAME WAY. the only reason seven was developed was to make money over it, and to gain back the opensources advances made in the the last 10y or so. macroshit has a known over-capitalistic buisness structure , (refer to the halloween documents and how they labled their own stolen version of system 4 to XENIX and later ones) , also by sticking your head out of the corp mold and lurkmoar about whats going on the community , ( ref [ www.openbsd.org ] , thou i agree you also need to unstick the head out of your ass, but you should understand quite clearly why this is a "forced os into the community" than a clear honest to user product. gk , same with me , skip it if you dont like. i on the other hand dont go on an heresy on my personnal life about my friends you dont even know. fack off you lile wannape elite Update » cutterhead wrote on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:48pm from openbsd's lyrics page
As developers of a free operating system, one of our prime responsibilities is device support. No matter how nice an operating system is, it remains useless and unusable without solid support for a wide percentage of the hardware that is available on the market. It is therefore rather unsurprising that more than half of our efforts focus on various aspects relating to device support. Most parts of the operating system (from low kernel, through to libraries, all the way up to X, and then even to applications) use fairly obvious interface layers, where the "communication protocols" or "argument passing" mechanisms (ie. APIs) can be understood by any developer who takes the time to read the free code. Device drivers pose an additional and significant challenge though: because many vendors refuse to document the exact behavior of their devices. The devices are black boxes. And often they are surprisingly weird, or even buggy. When vendor documentation does not exist, the development process can become extremely hairy. Groups of developers have found themselves focused for months at a time, figuring out the most simple steps, simply because the hardware is a complete mystery. Access to documentation can ease these difficulties rapidly. However, getting access to the chip documentation from vendors is ... almost always a negotiation. If we had open access to documentation, anyone would be able to see how simple all these devices actually are, and device driver development would flourish (and not just in OpenBSD, either). When we proceed into negotiations with vendors, asking for documentation, our position is often weak. One would assume that the modern market is fair, and that selling chips would be the primary focus of these vendors. But unfortunately a number of behemoth software vendors have spent the last 10 or 20 years building political hurdles against the smaller players. A particularly nasty player in this regard has been the Linux vendors and some Linux developers, who have played along with an American corporate model of requiring NDAs for chip documentation. This has effectively put Linux into the club with Microsoft, but has left all the other operating system communities -- and their developers -- with much less available clout for requesting documentation. In a more fair world, the Linux vendors would work with us, and the device driver support in all free operating systems would be fantastic by now. We only ask that users help us in changing the political landscape. |
| I'm feeling tarfu right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» JasonBeastly replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:53pm |
 Coolness: 76720 | |
| I'm feeling dorksided! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:56pm |
| Coolness: 131605 | no its superman |
| I'm feeling tarfu right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» GKiLLAZ replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 8:57pm |
| Coolness: 54800 | C'est le fun, on essai d'aider des gens sur un trouble de Windows 7 et on est rendu à parler de la domination Mondiale de MICRO$OFT.... trop drole tout ca
Tk si djCasTproS ya encore le gout de parler de son trouble, qu'il hésite pas. |
| I'm feeling none right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 9:11pm |
| Coolness: 131605 | Originally Posted By GKILLAZ
C'est le fun, on essai d'aider des gens sur un trouble de Windows 7 et on est rendu à parler de la domination Mondiale de MICRO$OFT.... trop drole tout ca Originally Posted By GKILLAZ
A small word about XP .... For all people who don't know that much computer, they better go to a newer version. .... All the others, do what you want ;) lol, same with your argument, you go one way saying theyll stop support , and this is why they should upgrade. i see about 4 wtf in your arguments. see why would i want to go with an os that intentionnaly removed support of a product to an other one with SIMPLY and other colour to promote sells and 3rd party softs sales ? also , why would you make it sound like futile conspiracy when i backed it up with facts not only reported by myself but all competitors of microsoft. facts are what they are , remove power user features for good , and profile users. on top of trashing technology and tons of works just so their share gets a lil more than what they scored last year, and make shure people who bought computers about 4 y ago are completly fucked. (and by that i mean the general user pool , one could append powerusers to this statement too) good go encourage that hope you buy a hybrid car and they turn hydrogen-compound on you just before they revert back to coal again... Update » cutterhead wrote on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 9:15pm again : Format Windows 7
autoclave do just that, and bootable from optical or magnetic or solidstate. can format up to 32 pass if you porn as much as gkillaz and need to blank proofs , like gkillaz, before your momy come home and user the family computer or the feds , either one that gets there first... Update » cutterhead wrote on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 9:16pm explain what is wrong in this statement here :
A particularly nasty player in this regard has been the Linux vendors and some Linux developers, who have played along with an American corporate model of requiring NDAs for chip documentation. This has effectively put Linux into the club with Microsoft, but has left all the other operating system communities -- and their developers -- with much less available clout for requesting documentation. In a more fair world, the Linux vendors would work with us, and the device driver support in all free operating systems would be fantastic by now. We only ask that users help us in changing the political landscape. |
| I'm feeling tarfu right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» GKiLLAZ replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 9:21pm |
| Coolness: 54800 | Encore son histoire de domination mondiale... blablabla...
Si on regarde ca comme cela, au même ryhtme que les voitures, il faudrait que - Microsoft surpporte encore windows DOS - Apple supporte des Macintosh et imprimantes Xérox ayant cette interface - IBM supporte OS2 Dans un autre domaine... - Les fabricants de vêtements ailles les vêtements de toutes les époques confondues... Oki, j'arrête là tu gagnes, tu montres encore que c'est tellement facile de te trouver ennuyant |
| I'm feeling none right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» JasonBeastly replied on Sat Nov 21, 2009 @ 11:29pm |
| Coolness: 76720 | Hey Neko really lay off, the October Revolution came and went, and the gigantic corporations of today totally paid no heed. Or they did, but they managed to quell all that red dissent with trade blockades.
So now we have world-wide mega-conglomerates that run everything. You know, there's only two options against that sort of power. Sink, or swim. Either go luddite and say fuck tech, or say "ok, I'll learn this stuff, help people with it, and laugh at what a mess it all is". The latter is necessary to do tech support of any sort. Windows 7 is way better than the previous Windows builds, and thank god because Vista is totally not fun to work with. If I have to guide another newbie through the Network and Sharing Center... well I inevitably do so I guess I'll do nothing. But yeah, with 7 at least this is a more streamlined process, without little windows popping up warning me not to touch. |
| I'm feeling dorksided! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Mon Nov 23, 2009 @ 12:01pm |
| Coolness: 131605 | > GAYKILLAZ SAID You'r comments meen nothing for 99.9% of the person who read this, we don't care about all the thing you'r talking. > GAYKILLAZ SAID Oki, j'arrête là tu gagnes, tu montres encore que c'est tellement facile de te trouver ennuyant lol , you back up a lot of abuse for someone in the wrong. man liek you said, if your too much of a newb then fucking skip it. you dont read so why bother i just wanted to shine light over bullshit brought to the table. -- this is way speculative by your part erik, id only agree with you if you'd back your speculation in order to make them facts. how can you say this, after you both of you skip my message as if it was ununderstainable alien fuckign technology. got news for you made on earth . and erik for a guy that study music tech and owns a mac. i seriously wonder if you know whats going on with the new machines that will hit the industry in the next years. and for a hippies you guys really talk shit since when its about tru facts of importance , you turn to your tl;dr in order to show the entire internet you dont know sqat about. shit most of you think you engineer sound. yet i feel not a lot of you program their own vst machine path , yet open source is out there and yall to lasy to go command line in order to make things proper , * oh dont get me wrong the options might still be there , your just letting other ppl decide whats good for you. my hopes is to light up the bright ones amongs you that are kepth silent by your bullshit gang treatment. make us proud and dont vote... idiots |
| I'm feeling tarfu right now.. | |
Format Windows 7
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
