Encryption Challenge
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Deadfunk replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 12:58pm |
i think it would be more than 500k
he would have millions dollars contract, and workin in top notch secret technologic places | |
I'm feeling hardcore right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:02pm |
Originally Posted By DONLOUIS
Si j'ai bien compris ya preske un gogol de possibilités bonne chance cutterhead ya plus de possibilités que d'atomes dans l'univers. non. lis ce qui ce passe au CERN. voi comment petit les detecteur capte . tu comprendra apres regarde la technoogie BLUE GENE de intel. un numero ces un detail. | |
I'm feeling 4hz even if you dont right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:02pm |
AES is a lousy encryption standard? lol.
okay. I guess that's why all web security is based on AES, right? Banks, governments.. EVERYONE, uses AES.. but hey, cutterhead says it sucks, so it does. Gotcha. | |
I'm feeling pompous right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:04pm |
yeap because it will be smash sooner than you think | |
I'm feeling 4hz even if you dont right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» DonLouis replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:07pm |
Originally Posted By CUTTERHEAD
non. lis ce qui ce passe au CERN. voi comment petit les detecteur capte . tu comprendra apres regarde la technoogie BLUE GENE de intel. un numero ces un detail. Ouais mais c'est pas un numéro la... j'ai fait un petit calcul vite vite: ((65 !) / 1 000 000) / 31 536 000 = 2.61531285 × 10(exposé)77 Le nombre de possibilités de password selon neoform : 65! 1 000 000 : Mettons que ton super-ordinateur peut essayer 1milliard de passwords par seconde. 31 536 000 : Le nombre de secondes approximatives dans une année bisextile. 1 / 2.61531285 X 10(exposé)77 = Le nombre de chances que ton super-ordi a de magiquement trouver le mot de passe la 1re année de décryption... Oui maman un numéro c'est juste un détail. | |
I'm feeling my angel right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:12pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Deadfunk replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:13pm |
mais cutterhead pkoi tu le fait pas? tu pourrais etre milionaire si tu ferais ca! | |
I'm feeling hardcore right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:18pm |
pkoi encore tu veut je construise un navette spaciale ? Update » cutterhead wrote on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:19pm if you get lots of ptr working , an exponent is a mere detail. Update » cutterhead wrote on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:21pm mon amis qui a un fujitsu mainframe , peu retourner 15 jours en arriere sur un calcule courant dans la meme instance. | |
I'm feeling 4hz even if you dont right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» DonLouis replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:21pm |
LoL I hope u believe in reincarnation cuz it's going to take you
5.06586494 × 10(exposé)74 lifetimes sitting in front of your cpu to do it | |
I'm feeling my angel right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 1:21pm |
mon amis qui a un fujitsu mainframe (2001) , peu retourner 15 jours en arriere sur un calcule courant dans la meme instance | |
I'm feeling 4hz even if you dont right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 2:16pm |
Hahah, even with the world community grid, you wont be able to crack AES-256 through brute force.
Even AES-128 hasn't ever been cracked and it's way less secure. Noah's insane, 4096 bit is ridiculously over done. Nothing any of us does is worth that level of encryption. AES-256 is more than enough for my banking and facebook. hahaha. | |
I'm feeling pompous right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nathan replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 4:29pm |
cutter never said he could crack it w/ the resources he has in his room for shit's sake, just that it's possible. and it is 'possible'. All things man-made have their flaws. If a computer made the code, a computer can crack the code, eventually.
Plus that whole 'number of possibilities' thing is pretty damn funny. A 'puter would take a million years to go through all the possible password combinations, and that's probably a fact, but what if the 'puter found the password within the first few tries? That IS a possibility, is it not? Seriously, what if the first chunk of characters the 'puter puts together is the right combo? You're assuming that your password is in the last place the computer would look... lol | |
I'm feeling you up right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Luna-1 replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 4:51pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 4:55pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Luna-1 replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 4:56pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 4:57pm |
Originally Posted By N.A
cutter never said he could crack it w/ the resources he has in his room for shit's sake, just that it's possible. and it is 'possible'. All things man-made have their flaws. If a computer made the code, a computer can crack the code, eventually. Plus that whole 'number of possibilities' thing is pretty damn funny. A 'puter would take a million years to go through all the possible password combinations, and that's probably a fact, but what if the 'puter found the password within the first few tries? That IS a possibility, is it not? Seriously, what if the first chunk of characters the 'puter puts together is the right combo? You're assuming that your password is in the last place the computer would look... lol thank you nathan , i apreciate you read what i posted and not turning to useless defacement like maoform Update » cutterhead wrote on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 5:05pm .. feel good to know people arent following only his delusions on whats been said... | |
I'm feeling 4hz even if you dont right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 5:02pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ApR1zM replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 5:29pm |
2 solution can be used to actually have it in less than a month! Rainbow cracking table + the use of gpu's to crack it !
id be willing to try :) i dont need the money just to see Neo pissed would be good enough eheheh | |
I'm feeling analyzing charts right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 5:45pm |
Originally Posted By N.A
cutter never said he could crack it w/ the resources he has in his room for shit's sake, just that it's possible. and it is 'possible'. All things man-made have their flaws. If a computer made the code, a computer can crack the code, eventually. AES is based on the Poincaré conjecture. If you can disprove it, you will be able to find collisions that will allow for cracking of the encryption. If however the Poincaré conjecture is true, you cannot simply "crack" AES. The only way to break it then, is to brute force it. Originally Posted By N.A
Plus that whole 'number of possibilities' thing is pretty damn funny. A 'puter would take a million years to go through all the possible password combinations, and that's probably a fact, but what if the 'puter found the password within the first few tries? That IS a possibility, is it not? Seriously, what if the first chunk of characters the 'puter puts together is the right combo? You're assuming that your password is in the last place the computer would look... lol Yeah, that'll work if i was an idiot and made my password "00000000000000000". But I didn't, and brute force attacks don't just do random characters, they do patterns in a predictable order, otherwise it will take significantly longer to do. | |
I'm feeling pompous right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nathan replied on Tue Feb 17, 2009 @ 6:28pm |
so, your password is "99999999999" ?
and i disprove that Pointcare bullshit... ...anything is possible. anyway, no point in discussing something with someone who can't admit that there are possibilities beyond what they learned in school... * you can gimme my 5 dollars now * | |
I'm feeling you up right now.. |
Encryption Challenge
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |