Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
Page: 1 2 Next »»Rating: Unrated [0]
Weird Question For All Producers
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 6:21pm
el_presidente
Coolness: 299335
My biggest problem with producing is always that I cannot finish a song because I am so scared of making my music too repetitive. But in electronic music, how many times can you loop a 16 beat sequence before people start getting annoyed by it?
I'm feeling lonely right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» bob_ replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 6:26pm
bob_
Coolness: 102215
je me suis toujours poser cette question la heheh
jamais trouvé de réponse par contre...
I'm feeling pfft heheh right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 6:30pm
el_presidente
Coolness: 299335
ptête on devrait faire des test. genre faire un party pis mettre des tounes avec différentes quantités de loop pis faire des statistiques dépendant de la réaction dla crowd.
I'm feeling lonely right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» volo replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 7:05pm
volo
Coolness: 40880
depends on the music and the listener...
don't forget music itself is repetition. all music of all kinds, repeats in various forms. even the craziest jazz musician ever will have something that brings it together. in regards to the listener...dancers can take a lot more repetition than you could imagine...research some of the trance inducement, shamanic drumming, all that kind of thing is very interesting. Nothing like seeing a crowd mesmerized by a simple 4/4 beat at 4am going strong to the simplest techno (good one derrick carter)
I'm feeling phuk'n gruuvin right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» bob_ replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 7:06pm
bob_
Coolness: 102215
j'imagine que ca doit être le contexte de la toune ou c'est quoi la mélodie etc...
j'veux dire, si j'aime la track...

se serait drole faire des tests heheheh
I'm feeling pfft heheh right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 7:13pm
screwhead
Coolness: 685600
I've been taking the same thing into consideration on the new stuff I've started working on. I think that it's usually pretty acceptable in most forms of electronic music with the exception of crazy breakcore/idm/glich stuff. People need some kind of repetitiveness, it's prevalent in pretty much every form of music. It adds some structure for people to latch onto. Work with similar arangements as rock/metal/pop; verse/bridge/chorus-structure, just add an intro/outro for mixing purposes.
I'm feeling fat and sassy right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 7:24pm
el_presidente
Coolness: 299335
so whats the magic number fred? i need to know
I'm feeling lonely right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 7:40pm
screwhead
Coolness: 685600
There's no real magic number.. If it starts to get too repetitive for you, change it up! Then again, sometimes such incredibly bad and repetitive stuff comes out it's amazing that people would even release it.. S-bag comes to mind.. It's 1 loop with 2 fills total.
I'm feeling fat and sassy right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bad_Chemistry replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 8:01pm
bad_chemistry
Coolness: 73095
I dunno, I ask myself the exact same question all the time. Lately I've been changing my shit up alot more often and it seems to work out pretty often... I guess it all depends what your building towards or what the melody is exactly.

I usually just change thigns up when I get bored of them.
I'm feeling like smoking crack right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 9:04pm
el_presidente
Coolness: 299335
the problem is that I get bored really quickly. One loop will annoy me. So I do not know what people can generally tolerate.
Update » El_Presidente wrote on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 9:04pm
Maybe we should get steve lalla to ask that question to all the big producers he interviews. They might have a more technical answer to this.
I'm feeling lonely right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» volo replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 9:43pm
volo
Coolness: 40880
the magic number is 23.

wait a minute, you're a dj....you can count can't you?
solve it for the more lazily inclined.
I'm feeling phuk'n gruuvin right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 9:56pm
el_presidente
Coolness: 299335
id say more around 4. And why wouldn't I be able to count?
I'm feeling lonely right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bad_Chemistry replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 10:30pm
bad_chemistry
Coolness: 73095
I think the trick is making it sound as if your not actually looping anything
I'm feeling like smoking crack right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Sun Nov 19, 2006 @ 11:59pm
alienzed
Coolness: 509570
Magic number = 8 bars.
That's it in psytrance anyway, but different aspects of the song will need differing patterns.
The Bass kick for example never really goes off 1/4
percussive synths are looped smaller while synth have the longest patterns, along with complicated basslines
I'm feeling bond, james bond right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Mon Nov 20, 2006 @ 2:00am
el_presidente
Coolness: 299335
alien_zed: I was talking about music, not psytrance!
I'm feeling lonely right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Mon Nov 20, 2006 @ 2:13am
nothingnopenope
Coolness: 201235
my problem is when the music is not repetitive enough...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Mon Nov 20, 2006 @ 11:36am
alienzed
Coolness: 509570
Originally Posted By EL_LEADER_MAXIMO

alien_zed: I was talking about music, not psytrance!


lol, my bad
I'm feeling bond, james bond right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» MURDOCK_ROCK replied on Mon Nov 20, 2006 @ 1:33pm
murdock_rock
Coolness: 83885
i find things start sounding too electronic if you quantise too much...

i also agree with freds comments on using formula's takin' from real music.

one thing that anoys me is how electronic "breakdowns" usually consist of a giant "build up" as opposed to an actual breakdown like you would hear in pop music where the whole vibe changes..

does that make any sense?
I'm feeling warm unicorn jizz right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Mon Nov 20, 2006 @ 1:35pm
screwhead
Coolness: 685600
well, if it's not quantised, then it's gonna be pretty unmixable.. Try mixing live drummers
I'm feeling fat and sassy right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Deadfunk replied on Mon Nov 20, 2006 @ 2:20pm
deadfunk
Coolness: 153015
4 is a good number, but it changes track by track, and by style too, there is tech/house wich is almost 5:00 of the same non-stop beat...

but with 4 sequences of 16 beats (wich mean aprox. 0:22 @ 175 bpm) is the classic way, because most of the vocal is structured like this anyways,

but still depend on the track/style, im used to do trance paterns...(happyhardcore, nu style gabber, freeform, trance, hardtrance, ect...) wich are mostly 4 sequences of 4 bars ...(64 beats)

and tech/house/non melodic stuff is usually way longer ...

so it really depends on the style you are making, the track itself, and of course the producer... because its you who are producing the track, not the people who dances!
I'm feeling in lawve right now..
Weird Question For All Producers
Page: 1 2 Next »»
Post A Reply
You must be logged in to post a reply.