Missle Defence
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 12:32am |
 Coolness: 154685 | WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 12:36am |
 Coolness: 150470 | RUN FOR THE HILLS!
...again. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 12:38am |
 Coolness: 202125 | Originally posted by FANCYLUNG...
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!! well when all the oil is gone, i give it 50 years or so, we are for sure will be in major jams then.. totally screwed since we are all so adapted to this lifestyle |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 12:40am |
| Coolness: 154685 | well, if we're going to be screwed in the future (without a doubt), it will be out fault anyways sooo.. haha guess we have to pay the consequences! no? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 12:57am |
| Coolness: 202125 | I'll be dead by then, so Im safe.
Just the future and well-being of my children will have to experience a different kind of life |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 1:02am |
| Coolness: 150470 | I've read that oil is perpetual.
Something related to the discovery of 'tarsands' or 'Oil sands' And Canada just so happens to have the largest deposit in the world. So the world won't be fucked when all the crude oil runs out... Just Canada, if you know what I mean... *cough* Iraq *cough* Here's the [ ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu ] |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 1:04am |
 Coolness: 339675 | yeah, but unfortunetly we don't have a perpetual supply of clean air. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 1:08am |
| Coolness: 150470 | Touchee |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 9:16am |
 Coolness: 68985 | Originally posted by MICO!...
I've read that oil is perpetual. Something related to the discovery of 'tarsands' or 'Oil sands' And Canada just so happens to have the largest deposit in the world. So the world won't be fucked when all the crude oil runs out... Just Canada, if you know what I mean... *cough* Iraq *cough* Here's the [ ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu ] yeah.. that's true but it is extremely dificult to extract oil from tarsands you need to use super heated vapor to extract the oil from the sand, and the sand is so fine that in order to put that water back into nature you would need to let the sand settle for 20 years before it would be same for animals or humans to use it again... even using chemicals to help the sand deposit itself it would still take somewhere around 10 or 15 years for that water to be clean again... and it take massive amounts of water to extract the oil from tarsands... as much water (if not more) as oil that would be extracted from the sands |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 5:48pm |
| Coolness: 150470 | So?
How is that any worse than were already doing? Point is, that oil isn't going to run out any time soon. Even though it seem 'next to impossible' to extract it... we've been doing it for nearly 15-years. And don't tell me that we aren't going to manage to find technology to facilitate that withing the next five. And Ian... even though you caught me on the 'perpetual air' comment.' I know you read the part that said that within the next 5-years (2010), they expect to reduce the emissions by 45%. Wait antother five-years, and see much CO2 comes out from its prodcution. BONG! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 6:19pm |
| Coolness: 339675 | heh, kyoto has not even been accepted by the US, so i really don't see those emmissions going down..
what we need is new technology that can replace trees, and can convert CO2 into O2 |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 11:35pm |
 Coolness: 121645 | Nice idea Neoform....help trees to filter co2 to o2 but im sure this will be very difficult to make. And can u explain me how to post pictures on forum plz |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Mar 15, 2005 @ 11:39pm |
| Coolness: 339675 | converting CO2 to O2 would mean you'd be able to remove the carbon from the air, which isn't very easy at all. it'd probably require a lot of electricity..
[img ]url goes here[/ img] with no spaces. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X replied on Wed Mar 16, 2005 @ 12:27am |
| Coolness: 121645 | what is an URL?
wait lets try this.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X replied on Wed Mar 16, 2005 @ 12:28am |
| Coolness: 121645 | almost....but can u upload picture from ur computer like c:\my images\pic1\ |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X replied on Wed Mar 16, 2005 @ 12:33am |
| Coolness: 121645 | Take 2...
 |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X replied on Wed Mar 16, 2005 @ 12:40am |
| Coolness: 121645 | For the subject of the MDS I have a nice pic how it work....if this work |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Wed Mar 16, 2005 @ 9:33am |
| Coolness: 202125 | [ news.yahoo.com ]
The Liberals got hammered over remarks by Ottawa's ambassador-designate to Washington, Frank McKenna, who said Canada was already part of missile defence through a revised Norad agreement signed in August. But the government denied that, insisting again that the August agreement to link Norad to the missile program didn't mean Canada had joined the project. it was really hard finding links to this. but yeah what i mentioned last time was true.. and eventually they will set up missles in canada over time, it doesnt say that in the article though |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X replied on Wed Mar 16, 2005 @ 10:42am |
| Coolness: 121645 | da system work like this
 |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Wed Mar 30, 2005 @ 12:24pm |
| Coolness: 202125 | [ judy.gnn.tv ]
Canada already onboard U.S. missile defence program B04225 Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:40:32 -0600 OTTAWA (CP) – The country’s next ambassador to Washington dropped a political bombshell Tuesday, saying Canada is already part of the controversial U.S. missile defence program. Frank McKenna made the comment after appearing before a Commons committee examining his appointment by Prime Minister Paul Martin. McKenna told the foreign affairs committee he wasn’t sure what more U.S. President George W. Bush needs from Canada on the controversial plan to create a continental missile shield. Afterward, the former premier of New Brunswick went much further with reporters. Asked directly if Canada is already part of the program, McKenna responded: “We are. “We’re part of it now and the question is what more do we need?” Martin’s Liberals have consistently denied that they’ve committed Canada to the missile defence program. |
Missle Defence
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
