Implication Of Metaphysics On Knowledge
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 3:52pm |
 Coolness: 339870 | i think you do jackie..
so it's settled. jackie meant to say 'ninth gate' |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 3:56pm |
 Coolness: 174295 | I need to purchase the 9th gate. wonderful movie. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 3:57pm |
| Coolness: 339870 | zazel..
if that movie made any sense at all, it MIGHT have been ok.. the angel chick wasn't even that hot.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» NastyVincent replied on Thu Feb 20, 2003 @ 1:40pm |
 Coolness: 39320 | "we can't tell where an electron will be at a certain moment in time."
Quantic physic is crazy you can only relie on propability |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cloud9ine replied on Thu Feb 20, 2003 @ 2:13pm |
 Coolness: 138925 | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Violence_Inc replied on Thu Feb 20, 2003 @ 3:12pm |
| Coolness: 174295 | She wasnt an angel you idiot. She was the devil. It made enough sense, to be worthy of purchasing it. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Feb 20, 2003 @ 4:48pm |
| Coolness: 339870 | hahahaha
"she wasn't an angel, she was the devil".. Yeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhhhh that makes sense.. i don't pretend to believe in that shite, but satan is a fallen angel.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» daFTWin replied on Fri Jun 11, 2004 @ 5:38pm |
 Coolness: 276640 | A BIG FUCKING JUG OF WINE!!! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PaT_ replied on Fri Jun 11, 2004 @ 5:53pm |
| Coolness: 116500 | i think i drank some of that wine.
was it at nats place? i remember you guys having a jug of wine... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Fri Jun 11, 2004 @ 6:13pm |
 Coolness: 145405 | i was really impressed when at first i thought it gen writting that
now that i know it's ben I'm way less impressed, after all it is the same question/subject he's been carrying on with at parties for the last 3 years so he can pick up girls face it dude there's no clear cut answer that you can just come up with in less than a hundred words, you could write a library full of books and still not have an answer. it's like when we study language, if we ask whats more fundemental to the other , truth or meaning, we can't come up with a neat and little answer, it will alway be big messy and at the end of it all unfullfilling. If we say Epistemology(what we can know) is more fundemental than metaphysics(literally what there is) we arrive at subject dependent reality (idealism) If we go the other route and say metaphysics is more fundemental than epistemology we end up with object dependent reality (materialism) Although both these position's are worth learning about they are both too restrictive and realisticaly untenable because of obvious inconsistency for my part i think we should move towards a position that is much more flexible, towards a context deependent reality, that accounts for the complex nature of human reallity, that of a subject existing within the boundries of an objective world (contextualism, existentialism, and Situationism) hope this clears things up for ya, But I know it doesn't... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» daFTWin replied on Fri Jun 11, 2004 @ 6:48pm |
| Coolness: 276640 | no. I got peach shnapps went to bens he was sleeping wokr up beat up mike stole my peach shnapps and i left. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» tuesmondieu replied on Sat Jun 12, 2004 @ 2:01pm |
 Coolness: 94530 | God damn...Olee really use to hate my guts.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Sat Jun 12, 2004 @ 6:16pm |
 Coolness: 92700 | trashyest day ever!! i love that half crimped hair look kaf... hot shit |
Implication Of Metaphysics On Knowledge
[ Cumbre de Página ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Cumbre de Página ] |
