Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Correo electrónico: Contraseña:
Anonymous
Nueva cuenta
¿Olvidaste tu contraseña?
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next »»Rating: Unrated [0]
Time Laws Revisited
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 6:07am
screwhead
Coolness: 685670
In a twist of reality mirroring Hollywood, researchers have proposed Grandfather"> ] Paradox.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 6:21am
neoform
Coolness: 339745
right, now all they have to do is complete the simple task of making a time machine..! shit, it's almost TOO easy!
these guy's are fucking geniuses.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cvxn replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 9:21am
cvxn
Coolness: 178725
bah, we just have to go to UK and steal Dr.Who's Tardis.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 10:30am
michaeldino
Coolness: 69055
that's a horrible article...
i want to read the actual scientists' report...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 1:49pm
basdini
Coolness: 145280
men are not meant to have the ability to travel through at their will...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 3:55pm
neoform
Coolness: 339745
we're almost not "meant" to fly, eat meat or have gay sex...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 5:37pm
basdini
Coolness: 145280
we are not ready for immortality...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 8:55pm
neoform
Coolness: 339745
haha, more like the world is not ready for immortal humans..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 9:02pm
basdini
Coolness: 145280
imagine a war where no one can die...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 9:37pm
neoform
Coolness: 339745
life is qualified by it's mortality.
i don't believe any living thing can pass as "immortal".
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Sun Jun 19, 2005 @ 11:29pm
nuclear
Coolness: 2604065
Dr WHO KNEW BEST, I AGREE!
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Mon Jun 20, 2005 @ 6:07am
moondancer
Coolness: 92345
my pet rock is immortal. Don't tell me he was never alive to begin with cause I know he is, he has eyes. Anything with eyes is alive. Even if they're googly.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Mon Jun 20, 2005 @ 5:12pm
basdini
Coolness: 145280
like cookie monster
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Jun 20, 2005 @ 7:03pm
mico
Coolness: 150540
Originally posted by MOONDANCER...

my pet rock is immortal. Don't tell me he was never alive to begin with cause I know he is, he has eyes. Anything with eyes is alive. Even if they're googly.


hahaha
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Jun 20, 2005 @ 9:31pm
mico
Coolness: 150540
Time laws never made sense to me.
Harry Potter
12-Monkies
Time cop
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Trey replied on Mon Jun 20, 2005 @ 10:48pm
trey
Coolness: 102845
Originally posted by DINOSAUR...

that's a horrible article...
i want to read the actual scientists' report...


here's a science report on Time Travel.
after you finish reading it, you can explain it to us.:)

[ ] Travel Paradox by S.Krasnikov

pure physics stuff, me head explodes trying to understand.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Tue Jun 21, 2005 @ 3:50pm
cactain_steef
Coolness: 154755
if time travel is possible, why haven't we been overrun by tourists from the future?

you see...we already can travel through time. all you need is an airplane! even though you can only go forward (or back) about 24 hours...

say you live in samoa.. or new zealand.. or one of those islands, and then you decide to take a flight into vancouver, well.. isnt there almost a 24 hour time difference? anyways, you'll have to turn your clock backwards once you get to vancouver... et voila! time travel!

btw, i think stephen hawking's chronology protection conjecture is dead on.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Jun 21, 2005 @ 6:38pm
screwhead
Coolness: 685670
:lol well it's not THAT simple, but read the whole theory. If there IS timetravel that's possible, we would never know about it, because the knowledge of it happening would change the future.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Jun 21, 2005 @ 8:12pm
neoform
Coolness: 339745
question: say you go back in time, change something, how can you go back to the time you came from? the time you came from will no longer exist, because of that, there would be an alternate you in that newly formed time.. do you really want to be living with another version of you?
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Jun 21, 2005 @ 9:03pm
screwhead
Coolness: 685670
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

question: say you go back in time, change something, how can you go back to the time you came from? the time you came from will no longer exist, because of that, there would be an alternate you in that newly formed time.. do you really want to be living with another version of you?


You, as usual, didn't read a thing that was in the article.

The future can't be changed, because the "present" that you leave to go to the "past" has already happened, and the "present" today IS the result of having gone into the past. You can't go back and "change" anything, because you ALREADY did it, and it's already been factored into the whole of the universe at the moment. If you could travel back to 5 minutes ago, you couldn't kill yourself no matter how much you tried/wanted to, because you have to be here in 5 minutes to go back by 5.
Time Laws Revisited
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next »»
Post A Reply
You must be logged in to post a reply.