Coolness Rating....
|
 Coolness: 116415
| and you have seen me since? whats your point anyhow? |
|
 Coolness: 339785
| when did i see you since then? |
|
 Coolness: 685710
| I seeeee yooooooo! |
|
Coolness: 116415
| um, at foufs? |
|
 Coolness: 276555
| I worked really hard and spent a lot of devoted hours to be where I am today, I deserve my coolness.
Ian, doesnt. |
|
Coolness: 339785
| uhh, why? you've got less posts than i. why would that make you cooler? |
|
 Coolness: 92385
| Okay two things:
1. why did you change the word posts to the word messages??? they are not called messaged they are called posts. That's misleading and just plain bad english
2. seeing post count in below our name was useful. now it's just.... useless.
okaY OKAY and 3. if i came to this site not knowing anythign about it, i would probably think that one or more people actually rated how cool people are, in which case i weould be scared of rejection and leave
oh oh and 4. I'm not cool |
|
 Coolness: 201345
| Well the math is incorrect, for one thing.. How can you be more than 100% cool? If you are 100% cool, you are completely cool. |
|
Coolness: 339785
| i best tell all those financial fat cats that their company's didn't actually make 300% gains this quarter, instead it was limited to 100% cause scott said so..! |
|
Coolness: 201345
| money isn't the same thing..
You are going to have to explain your backround of coolness before comparisons can be made.
If you are a person you cannot be more than 100% of yourself. |
|
Coolness: 339785
| no, but i can be 19080% cooler than someone with a coolness rating of 100% can't i? thus the "rating" system. duuuuh. |
|
Coolness: 92385
| That isn't the point though, the point is to be a. user friendly and b. inviting |
|
Coolness: 276555
| ON RAVEWAVE?!
hahahaha, its soo missleading. |
|
Coolness: 92385
| What do you mean? I'm talkign about marketing principles. |
|
 Coolness: 51185
| Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...
hey, i happen to be the coolest person here, just cause it tells me so..!
it should be changed to the "gaynest factor" then...lol |
|
Coolness: 116415
| what about my umbrella? |
|
Coolness: 339785
| hot dog hot dog! yes sir no sir! |
|
Coolness: 339785
| Originally posted by MOONDANCER...
Okay two things:
1. why did you change the word posts to the word messages??? they are not called messaged they are called posts. That's misleading and just plain bad english
how is it not a message?
even in the definition of the word:
"An electronic message sent to a newsgroup: ignored several inflammatory posts."
not the third word there. message is far more descriptive of what it is than the word "post". |
|
 Coolness: 64910
| its gay |
|
Coolness: 51185
| supa' gay |
Coolness Rating....
You must be logged in to post a reply.
