Montreal Anti Police Brutality Protest
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» databoy a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 10:48am |
 Coolness: 106100 | How many cops does it take to immobalize a guy in a wheelchair? |
| I'm feeling deep right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 12:27pm |
 Coolness: 121620 | The police bashing 2 young with a mountain bike was epic |
| I'm feeling rested at last right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Kishmay_Pinas a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 12:47pm |
 Coolness: 103240 | Originally Posted By LILOPINPIN
just came back, was pretty fun. one chance a year to throw rocks at cops.. i mean comon.. atleast 4000 people attended and i dont see whats wrong breaking windows of shops, shops are part of a bigger problem, capitalism, which we must get rid of. mcdo, 2nd cup, adidas, all these, id like to throw rocks at them everyday.. What's wrong is first and foremost that what you have described has NOTHING to do with the coalition against police brutality. Want to protest against capitalism wait til the anti capitalist march or the anarchist fair. You and all the other supposed anti capitalist protestors turn what should be a march of awareness against police brutality into a showcase of police brutality. Let's go poke a cave of bears until they attack and then claim it's unfair and unprovoked Fuckin brilliant! |
| I'm feeling ez sessions monday wut! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» databoy a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 4:05pm |
| Coolness: 106100 | More police brutality here:
[ www.youtube.com ] As long as dumbass anarchists keep throwing rocks at the cops, they wont have to send in undercovers to stir shit up. And will be justified in sending in the riot squad. Bunch of tools. |
| I'm feeling deep right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Masa a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 5:58pm |
 Coolness: 158755 | Originally Posted By DATABOY
As long as dumbass anarchists keep throwing rocks at the cops (...) As an anarchist, I kinda resent that. Real anarchists would never throw rocks at cops. |
| I'm feeling chaotic! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Kishmay_Pinas a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 6:04pm |
| Coolness: 103240 | Right jo. But your are not a "dumbass anarchist"
There is a big difference |
| I'm feeling ez sessions monday wut! right now.. | |
| Good [+2]Toggle ReplyLink» databoy a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 6:08pm |
| Coolness: 106100 | Originally Posted By MASA
Real anarchists would never throw rocks at cops. Why, is there a law amongst anarchists that forbids you to throw rocks at cops? ;) |
| I'm feeling deep right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Masa a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 6:24pm |
| Coolness: 158755 | Haha, I see what you did there  |
| I'm feeling chaotic! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» databoy a répondu le Sat 17 Mar, 2012 @ 7:08pm |
| Coolness: 106100 | Anyone set on changing things for the better in society should abandon the Anarchist tag. I'm not saying it doesn't have its place in philosophy, but anarchists have traditionally been the bogyman for the general public. Anarchy for almost everyone in democracy is a not positive phenomenon. So unless your dead set on fighting to rehabilitate anarchism in the eye of the public AND changing how society works, it might be more important to focus on the main objective.
Specially if you have to explain oxymoron's like: unwritten rules among anarchists. |
| I'm feeling deep right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Blisss a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 5:27am |
 Coolness: 129705 | My experience with anarchists is they usually aren't the smartest people in the room
They would rather have chaos then a semblance of order which is inherently stupid to begin with Most end up either in jail or are unable to find work because their name comes up on some FBI list Definitely not the wisest path to take in life |
| I'm feeling sunshine right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Count_Bandit a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 8:37am |
 Coolness: 49145 | why would anarchist would want chaos? they just advocates a stateless society based on non hierarchical voluntary association. |
| I'm feeling for food right now.. | |
| Good [+2]Toggle ReplyLink» databoy a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 11:20am |
| Coolness: 106100 | Given that humans are competitive by nature, good luck creating a society based on non hierarchical voluntary association. |
| I'm feeling deep right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Masa a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 1:22pm |
| Coolness: 158755 | Lack of coercion is mostly what impedes anarchical states. But it does dwindle down to the competitiveness and greediness of human nature.
One can hope, though, that too is part of human nature 
Originally Posted By BLISSS
My experience with anarchists is they usually aren't the smartest people in the room You're an anarchist too, Blisss? Go read a fucking book, dumbass. I try to not judge stupid people, but when they shove it in my face, it's fair game. |
| I'm feeling chaotic! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Blisss a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 1:46pm |
| Coolness: 129705 | Originally Posted By COUNT_BANDIT
why would anarchist would want chaos? they just advocates a stateless society based on non hierarchical voluntary association. yeah we saw how well that worked out with the Occupy movement. The homeless took over Originally Posted By Masa
You're an anarchist too, BLISSS? Go read a fucking book, dumbass. I try to not judge stupid people, but when they shove it in my face, it's fair game. what book? The anarchist dumbass cookbook? |
| I'm feeling sunshine right now.. | |
| Good [+2]Toggle ReplyLink» Masa a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 4:40pm |
| Coolness: 158755 | Try some Kant for some insights on ACTUAL anarchy.
Or you know, stay stupid and clueless. You seem to be doing a pretty good job at it, imho. |
| I'm feeling chaotic! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Blisss a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 8:11pm |
| Coolness: 129705 | Actually a quick google of the word "Anarchist" shows that Im right
[ dictionary.reference.com ] an·ar·chist [an-er-kist] Show IPA noun 1. a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism. 2. a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed. 3. a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom. Mise À Jour » Blisss a écrit sur Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 8:17pm As for Kant, I dont think I need to rely on some 17th century german philosopher to understand a definition. In fact I can pretty much safetly say that anything from the 17th century is pretty much "passe". Try reading some new material bro, those school notes from 1997 arent cutting it here ;) |
| I'm feeling sunshine right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Masa a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 8:45pm |
| Coolness: 158755 | Aight, let's try something more recent.
[ www.urbandictionary.com ] I know you enjoy trying to piss me off, but try and do it right, ass. How hard was it to find ONE biased website that suited your uneducated opinion on anarchy? |
| I'm feeling chaotic! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» databoy a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 11:37pm |
| Coolness: 106100 | Unfortunately, Blisss's definition is the one most peoples know and have accepted.
Anarchy is pretty much burnt as far as names go. Maybe its time to find a new "ism" that isn't synonymous with chaos, destruction and street punks. Like "occupyism" or "ninety nine percentism"... |
| I'm feeling deep right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Masa a répondu le Sun 18 Mar, 2012 @ 11:59pm |
| Coolness: 158755 | I'ma take it back, you watch me.
Besides, those new ism's of yours aren't really better, look at what Blisss thinks of the Occupy concept  |
| I'm feeling chaotic! right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini a répondu le Mon 19 Mar, 2012 @ 5:14am |
 Coolness: 145185 | Anarchism is why Occupy failed as a movement, saying you want to set up a commune in the center of the park to create a 'leaderless' society, doesn't get us very far, working people don't have time for that type of thing. They real economic issues that need to be resolved.
having said that, 'voluntarism' which forms core aspects of anarchism, is however worth exploring...the idea that if someone doesn't want the benefits of something (like say health care or unemployment insurance then they shouldn't be forced to pay for it). It's the idea that the most just set up occurs when everyone participating in something has agreed to participate. However, a society without hierarchy or leaders is unworkable, this is why we have democracy, because the war of all against all (anarchy) and rule by one person unrestrained in his power (tyranny) are both unworkable. |
| I'm feeling surly right now.. | |
Montreal Anti Police Brutality Protest
[ Haut de la page ] |
Poster Une Réponse |
Vous devez être connecté pour soumettre une réponse.
[ Haut de la page ] |
