Usted necesita una cuenta a fin de usar esta opción.
Implication Of Metaphysics On Knowledge
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» da_instagatah replied on Sun Feb 16, 2003 @ 4:06pm |
 Coolness: 144290 | yeah olee, that's why gen was in CEGEP?
but no, she never finnished high school. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» G__ replied on Sun Feb 16, 2003 @ 7:06pm |
 Coolness: 141425 | oh oh oh, WHO HAD THE BALLS, make em say UHHHHHH NA NA NA NAAAAAA i'ma ttttuuuuuuuuuuug,,,blahf blahf blahf...i'm picking my nose |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sun Feb 16, 2003 @ 8:03pm |
 Coolness: 339725 | "yeah but who had the balls to say it"
check the first reply in this thread.. note the sarcasm.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mindset replied on Sun Feb 16, 2003 @ 8:20pm |
| Coolness: 52605 | french people cant detect sarcasm on the net.
it's a fact. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» blop replied on Mon Feb 17, 2003 @ 1:07pm |
 Coolness: 200590 | did you know english has 1.5 more words than french?
it's true cause i said it. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Mon Feb 17, 2003 @ 1:12pm |
 Coolness: 685650 | Did you know french is more complicated and harder to learn than Mandarin? It's in the top 5 hardest languages to learn. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» daFTWin replied on Mon Feb 17, 2003 @ 2:06pm |
 Coolness: 276495 | Only people who don't understand what being funny is cause their to full of themselves would of had the balls to point it out. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Miss_Amanda replied on Mon Feb 17, 2003 @ 2:08pm |
 Coolness: 160605 | really fred?
I wanted to learn mandarin... but if it's easier than french I think I'll go through with it |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Mon Feb 17, 2003 @ 2:22pm |
| Coolness: 685650 | It's what I've heard/read somewhere. Mandarin is suposed to be easier to learn than english, but learning ANY new language if your older than 11-12 is damn hard to do, because your brain stops learning as fast and as much. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» maskinn replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 12:25pm |
| Coolness: 45475 | i live this subject.
searching for lights in the quantum theory i found some stuff that linked physics-metaphysics-mysticism. it related in some way to what we can know on the basis that our look on reality has an influence on what we see... anyways look: "Our concept of time and space, the very structure of the universe, are more intimately related to problems and phenomenon of consciousness than we have seriously suspected.... There is no strict division between subjective and objective reality, consciousness and the physical universe are connected by some fundamental physical mechanism. This relationship between mind and reality is not subjective or objective, but 'omnijective' An omnijective concept of the universe is by no means new ... There is a vast philosophical and metaphysical tradition behind the philosophy that the universe is omnijective: The mystics tell us this is true. The idealists tell us it is true. Most exciting of all, the physicists tell us it is true." Source: "Mysticism and the New Physics" Michael Talbot |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cloud9ine replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 12:33pm |
 Coolness: 138780 | Sounds like the Council of Nine.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 12:35pm |
| Coolness: 339725 | you mean the ninth gate.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lilmissmeow replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 12:38pm |
 Coolness: 72860 | this is interesting...
maskinn...please discuss. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cloud9ine replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:00pm |
| Coolness: 138780 | No Neoform. THE Council of Nine. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Zz.ee.vV replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:02pm |
 Coolness: 194085 | i prefer seven of nine.
she has like the most perfect lips :b (boobs!boobs!boobs!lips too) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» maskinn replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:02pm |
| Coolness: 45475 | it's funny cos the most recent discoveries on electron's movement are saying that we can't tell where an electron will be at a certain moment in time.
the only way to see where it is is to observ it at this time and by observing it you break its movement. well for further infos go on google coz i just have a hard time typing and explaining stuff today. just enough cerebral activity to work. you can search on schrodinger's cat, an hypothetic experiment with two possible results (the cat being either dead or alive afterwards) and your only way to know is to look... very funny. and also for links with mysticism type wahdat-ul-wujud (oneness of being). the muslim mysticism close to "all is in all" from taoism and bouddhism. it's funny to see how these info can link apparently very appart matters in an intuitive way for all of us that dropped out of school before getting to it. fuck i read back this post and the keywords are "funny and link". whatever. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lilmissmeow replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:09pm |
| Coolness: 72860 | thanks ... i'll check it out. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» maskinn replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:11pm |
| Coolness: 45475 | if you don't mind i'd like to know what you think of it afterwards.
can you get back to this subject when you're done? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» maskinn replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:12pm |
| Coolness: 45475 | fuck double post
i'm dumb |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» lilmissmeow replied on Wed Feb 19, 2003 @ 1:30pm |
| Coolness: 72860 | for sure boi. :) |
Implication Of Metaphysics On Knowledge
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
