Green Party Got A Seat??
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Jan 23, 2006 @ 10:16pm |
 Coolness: 339790 | Wow, i think they finally got a seat. crazy. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PartyPopple replied on Mon Jan 23, 2006 @ 10:27pm |
 Coolness: 63540 | Yay for that!! :)
They deserve it! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» no.name replied on Mon Jan 23, 2006 @ 11:08pm |
 Coolness: 129315 | are you sure it's the gree party?? maybe it's an other random party. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Jan 23, 2006 @ 11:08pm |
| Coolness: 339790 | Nah, they lost it. haha, CTV had them going for a bit with 1 seat.. :P |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Lone_Star replied on Mon Jan 23, 2006 @ 11:28pm |
 Coolness: 153180 | Atleast the logo got shown on national television for a couple of minutes.
FOR FREE. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» xbsd replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 1:29am |
 Coolness: 76870 | parti vert c'est dla droite tu le savais ? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 1:38am |
 Coolness: 146450 | de nos jours même la gauche est à droite |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Trey replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 2:47am |
 Coolness: 102890 | .... i wanted to vote for Green party but they are against nuclear power. fuck dat.
nuclear, cold fusion, fission, whatever one of those is the power for our energy demand. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 2:58am |
| Coolness: 339790 | Nuclear energy is actually quite clean compaired to coal and even hydro. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 3:50am |
 Coolness: 159245 | True that, surprizingly. Unfortunately, the waste created with depleted uranium rods are not so easy to recycle. Oh well. Ship 'em to Texas ! Hee haw ! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Trey replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 5:00am |
| Coolness: 102890 | We can always launch them into space and direct them to our beloved star, the Sun. Of course, the very very very and i mean very miniscule chance that the rocket will explode in Earth's atmosphere and spreading the radioactive waste in our atmosphere is ridiculous. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 5:54am |
 Coolness: 92390 | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 5:56am |
| Coolness: 92390 | hey wait a minute.. thats not the green party, who the fuck is it? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» soyfunk replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 8:55am |
 Coolness: 126895 | a popular shock radio show host |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ikce replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 9:13am |
 Coolness: 65600 | Andre Arthur got the seat. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 12:30pm |
| Coolness: 146450 | nuclear energy is clean and necessary ??!! i see you really don't have enough nuclear plants in here to say such nonsense... nuclear energy is the most dangerous of all, most of the nuclear plants are contaminating its surrounding inhabitants on several kilometers, as well as the underground rivers and the soil. moreover, there are plenty of other energies, which are renewable and clean, that would suffice for the worldwide demand.
nuclear energy is just a matter of lobbying, big money, and a justification for atomic research (for weapons&defense purposes). |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 12:33pm |
| Coolness: 339790 | No way.
I've visited many powerplants in the past.. I've been to 3 hydro plants around quebec and a number of nuclear plants in the US.. The waste produced by nuclear plants is FAR less than hydro. Hydro destroys thousands of kilometers of land! Nuclear power produces highly dangerous materials.. yes, but in small quantities. Let's not even get into how bad coal is. Coal is by far the worst. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mdc replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 12:38pm |
| Coolness: 148940 | not anymore
the big hydro projects of the 70s were bad.. but the new ones are extremely clean and produce NO waste...(hello.. .water?) the only problem hydro face was flooding lands where trees and animals lived, causing mercury levels to rise drastically... but now they allow for open hunt on all animals in the flooding region years before the flooding and have pulp and paper companies come to clean out all the trees... nuclear is also very safe nowadays... everyone is just scared of it because of a vague recollection of chernobyl... and moveis... nuclear is cleaner and possibly safer than coal.. only the depleted uranium (and/or plutonium) are difficult o get rid of... but contamination of cities around the plant? highly unlikely |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 12:51pm |
| Coolness: 146450 | hydro may not be 100% clean, but it's one of the cleanest and most renewable energies we have NOWADAYS.
nuclear plants produces TONS of highly toxic wastes ; some of them can be treated to become (almost) clean, and the remainder is buried underwater or under the ground, in leaking barrels. these quantities are huge and we still have NO CLUE AT ALL about how getting rid of them. yes why not send them in a country we don't like, or much better, in space !? contamination of cities around the plant my be highly unlikely for you, but i'm sorry it's a real fact. people in a 10km radius are given iodized pills to help prevent cancers and throat/tyrrhoid diseases. there's a worldwide UN-information (worse than mis-information) about nuclear energy, because of the lobbying and armed purposes i mentioned earlier. (one of ?) the only non-governmental laboratory studying nuclear energy in the world : [ www.criirad.org ] |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mr_Frog replied on Tue Jan 24, 2006 @ 2:07pm |
 Coolness: 97225 | one day we will be able to send nuclear waste in space/in the sun, but this day is far far from here, chances that a rocket explode are too risky to try this, plus a rocket can't carry that much weight, and nuclear waste are quite heavy.
For the Nuclear, the problem I see he that it's not efficient now. The nuclear reaction is only boiling water. One day, we will be able to use that nuclear enery directly in electricity, but it seems that it's we're not there yet. Let's put wind farm all around Quebec and let's study to have more efficient Solar cells! |
Green Party Got A Seat??
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
