Riddle Me This
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 1:47am |
 Coolness: 339660 | If you have nothing, does nothing qualify as something? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nter replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 1:55am |
 Coolness: 92490 | if someone who gives something and then takes it back is an indian giver .. then whats an indian that gives indians and then takes them back? riddle me this batman! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» timmytork replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 2:17am |
 Coolness: 49665 | an idian gifter!! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 4:11am |
 Coolness: 159115 | Trust me, an indian wouldn't just GIVE you an indian, he'd sell it to you. No taxes. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» No_Comply replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 12:14pm |
 Coolness: 84930 | no, something qualifies as nothing, everything is nothing. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» WinterBlossom replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 12:28pm |
 Coolness: 43520 | since abstraction is a concept and loneliness a feeling...my guess is that having nothing is still something...as long as you're aware of it... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» No_Comply replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 12:30pm |
| Coolness: 84930 | but what if those concepts are nothing? Maybe everyone was wrong from the begining, it's not that things are, but that they are not. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Densetsu13 replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 12:36pm |
 Coolness: 76685 | Can you define nothing? Yes. So therefore nothing IS indeed something. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» WinterBlossom replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 12:49pm |
| Coolness: 43520 | depends on the way you see life...like an half empty or half full glass...concepts are created from scratch...but still are necessary at some point to explain states we relate to...things always are, just depends if you decide to see them or not...meaning that nothingness is still a thing you can have if you decide to acknowledge it... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 1:08pm |
 Coolness: 146320 | Originally posted by » DENSETSU13...
Can you define nothing? Yes. So therefore nothing IS indeed something. an empty set is definable but is actually nothing. but the generality of the "something" term applies to ANYthing, which includes everything and nothing ; thus nothing is something. and in the end i agree :) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 1:12pm |
| Coolness: 146320 | Originally posted by RYOKO...
since abstraction is a concept and loneliness a feeling...my guess is that having nothing is still something...as long as you're aware of it... abstraction is still something, even if you might not touch it. and loneliness is far from being nothing, for at least 2 reasons : 1) as you said, it's a feeling, so it's a nonempty thing 2) even when you're alone you still do have yourself, which is an important thing (or many things, according to how you look at it) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» WinterBlossom replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 1:29pm |
| Coolness: 43520 | i agree...but for me these two imply the fact thats theres a lack of definition or presence...so therefore...its very close to the point of having nothing...even tho theres something hehe
only my point of view |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 1:57pm |
| Coolness: 146320 | hmmm i guess we're coming to one of the most existential problem of most people : believing that a lack, as huge and painful it could be, is the same thing as void...
when you look to what you have instead of looking to what you lack (that you formerly had or that you wish to have), you look to positive things instead of negative ones... and your mood follows by :) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» WinterBlossom replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 2:11pm |
| Coolness: 43520 | true *^_^* |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 4:19pm |
 Coolness: 202110 | Yes.
Cause when were all dead, who are they gonna choose, whose gonna be left? The pimps and the hoes with nothing, and that's something! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» kwickStah replied on Sun Dec 11, 2005 @ 6:48pm |
 Coolness: 65540 | nothing doesnt really exist.. you always have something if you have (la raison) if you dont have it, you dont care if you have something.. i think.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mdc replied on Mon Dec 12, 2005 @ 11:37am |
 Coolness: 148810 | no
you dont' have anything suppose you have no apples, can you say you have apples? so if you have no thing (nothing) can you say you have something? no simple |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Dec 12, 2005 @ 12:02pm |
| Coolness: 339660 | nah, you're oversimplifying it.
it all depends if you define "nothing" as a sub-set of "things".. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Mon Dec 12, 2005 @ 12:21pm |
 Coolness: 2603980 | batman |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Mon Dec 12, 2005 @ 7:09pm |
| Coolness: 146320 | Originally posted by THOG...
batman perfectly synthetized :) |
Riddle Me This
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
