Time Might Be Flowing Backwards? - Page 1

Page: 1

Rating: Unrated [0]

Time Might Be Flowing Backwards?

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Sun Nov 14, 2010 @ 10:12pm


Coolness: 685665	Gonna be TL;DR for most people, but for those that are interested in quantum physics/mechanics... [ discovermagazine.com ]

	I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» DynV replied on Mon Nov 15, 2010 @ 2:35am


Coolness: 108880	Unless there's money to be money made out of it, it ain't happening.

	I'm feeling <3 sexi_babe_69 right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Mon Nov 15, 2010 @ 2:57am


Coolness: 685665	well, from what these guys have observed, future events affect the present on a quantum level similar to the double slit experiment.. With the right kinds of observation, money might just make itself :P

	I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Psykotropik replied on Mon Nov 15, 2010 @ 7:10pm


Coolness: 37970	That's amazing. :O

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» perception replied on Sun Dec 12, 2010 @ 10:50pm


Coolness: 65990	Originally Posted By SCREWHEAD well, from what these guys have observed, future events affect the present on a quantum level similar to the double slit experiment.. With the right kinds of observation, money might just make itself :P how? (p.s. I am familiar with the double slit experiment)

	I'm feeling punkadelic right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Sun Dec 12, 2010 @ 11:13pm


Coolness: 685665	Ok, so something similar was done; they found particles that rotated a certain way, and each time they took a reading on those particles, they accelerated their rotation.. To use totally random numbers, lets say that when they read them once, they rotated 10 times/second. When they took a 2nd reading, they would speed up again, and a third reading, and so on. So they take 10 particles and take two readings off of all 10 of them, but they don't look at the results. They then randomly pick 4 of those particles and read them a 3rd time. Once they've done that, they then go back and look at the readings they took. All the particles at reading 1 (again, throwing random numbers together here) would rotate at 10/s.. On reading 2, all the particles that only had 2 readings would rotate at 20/s, but all the particles that had a 3rd reading were rotating at 100/s on the 2nd reading! So, if someone could somehow "see" the patterns happening in every-day life, the really minute details, they could theoretically "ride" a better future (at least I think they could) For a person to do this, they'd probably have to be totally super-human.. But I'd imagine that with a quantum computer and an artificial intelligence, you could set it to look for patterns and influence them, putting you in the path for a specific future outcome.

	I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» DynV replied on Sun Dec 12, 2010 @ 11:31pm


Coolness: 108880	I think Screwhead is a physics buff. wow that's amazing, you put a small amount of high-friction content in a system ready for much higher quantity at traditional stimulation (ie: electric), and every so often you do that trick but I suppose there would be a need some kind of thermal flywheel ; just like breaking in an engine (RPM always changing).

	I'm feeling <3 sexi_babe_69 right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Mon Dec 13, 2010 @ 12:07am


Coolness: 685665	Originally Posted By DYNV I think Screwhead is a physics buff. I wish hehe, I'm just interested in all things awesome!

	I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» perception replied on Mon Dec 13, 2010 @ 12:03pm


Coolness: 65990	and they are positive that they are observing the same particles? Not a case of mistaken identify similar as to when they thought they had observed the first meson which ended up being a another baryon. Or is it possible that they are observing different decays, explaining the different excitation states? I dunno, just through shit out there.

	I'm feeling punkadelic right now..

Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Mon Dec 13, 2010 @ 1:03pm


Coolness: 685665	There were some similar experiments done in the 70s, but not with things on a quantum scale like that.. One that I've got a link to: the ear click experiment Another one that was done involving people (don't have the link anymore) was similar to the first one - a group of people were put through two zener card test, and a random number of those people were then selected and the doctors doing the test told them in what order they'd shown the cards for either the 1st or 2nd test. The people who were told in what order the cards were shown AFTER the test was completed are the ones that guessed more right on the 1st test than the second, and vice versa with the people shown the order of the cards for the 2nd test.

	I'm feeling like a drama magnet right now..

Time Might Be Flowing Backwards?

Page: 1

Post A Reply

You must be logged in to post a reply.