This Could Get Bad...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Fri Mar 23, 2007 @ 10:29am |
[ news.yahoo.com ] | |
I'm feeling surly right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Fri Mar 23, 2007 @ 10:35am |
It's not the first time Iran's done this.
They're protecting their borders and it's very unlikely the officers will be harmed. Iran isn't a terrorist country out to kill everyone, especially not the british.. doing so would be a clear act of war. | |
I'm feeling you up right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Fri Mar 23, 2007 @ 4:45pm |
'doing so would be a clear act of war' that's what i'm affraid of... Update » basdini wrote on Fri Mar 23, 2007 @ 5:15pm Ahmadinejad just canceled his visit to the UN in NYC... | |
I'm feeling surly right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Fri Mar 23, 2007 @ 6:52pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 1:17am |
situations of international tensions are unpredictable things have a way of spinning out of control sometimes. If the Brits hafta send a team in to get these guys out that's when it could get ugly. | |
I'm feeling surly right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 12:05pm |
Uh oh, this could be Iran's Gulf of Tonkin... Update » nothingnopenope wrote on Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 12:11pm Iran isn't a terrorist country out to kill everyone, especially not the british.. doing so would be a clear act of war.
Yeah Iran isn't into clear acts of war, they prefer to just fund the terrorists who do the dirty work. They aren't a nation of terrorists themselves but they apparently funnel a lot of money to various groups. | |
I'm feeling gangsta right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 1:12pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 1:23pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Sat Mar 24, 2007 @ 2:53pm |
They damn well should be.
The US might not be good at controlling populations, but they sure as fuck are good at destroying governments. | |
I'm feeling you up right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Sun Mar 25, 2007 @ 10:08am |
My prediction: The Iranian leaders will somehow find a way to blame the Jews for all this... | |
I'm feeling gangsta right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Trey replied on Mon Mar 26, 2007 @ 1:24pm |
Yours is a prediction without thoughts or reasons......
Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to removed the Palestine Liberation Organization ( PLO ), which were secular nationalists. Secular meaning "not pertaining to or connected with religion". Israeli Defence Force ( IDF ) disarms all nationalists and communists and groups that were base on secular ideologies. However, IDF left the communalist groups armed. Communalist as in " strong allegiance to one's own ethnic group rather than to society as a whole ". They were Shiite, Druze, and some Christians. A Shiite communalist group called the Amal movement were more communalist than religious, or fundamentalist. The invasion of Lebanon by Israel initiated a ummm.. a backlash.. from the Amal Movement.. well a spincter group from Amal and they became Hezbollah. With the PLO out, Hezbollah is in, backed by Iran. The Muslim world has very good reasons to hate Israel and its ally, the US. United States has a ugly habit of creating situations and policies which will come back and bite its ass. Washington actually supported, or encouraged i shoud said many Islamic fundamentalist groups to find regimes in the Middle-Easts which were not friendly to the U.S. They belived that secular national Arabs would control all of the energy reserve.. well oil. So the fundamentalist extremists grew, to fight against secualr nationlist. Also, remember that it was the CIA that trained Bin Laden and the Mujahideen to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. Finally, if one thinks "terrorism" is simply a attack on civilian targets in the Western worlds or democracy States, then he is simply wrong. The definition of terrorism by the UN resolution in December 1987 was voted; 153 against 2 with 1 abstain. Honduras abstain. United States and Israel .. against. The United States pretty much veto it because that very definition would make US the biggest aggressor, terrorist State in all of history...... Israel is a terror State too with the Occupied Territories. Non-govermental terrorist groups are nothing compared to State terrorism.. Looked at Iraq invasion by the U.S. Washington is simply telling the world, we will invaded whoever we want and when we want. These U.S. foreign policies are creating negative reaction in forms of Islamic Fundamentalists. If the only superpower in the world with the greatest military war machine is displeased with you... as in your Nation State is not bending to the will of US Imperialism ( a la Cuba ) then the only deterrent you have, the only way to protect yourself is to export terror and/or race for nuclear armaments. Update » Trey wrote on Mon Mar 26, 2007 @ 1:26pm bah, type it in keynote and paste it here . all the spacing is screwed up. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Mar 26, 2007 @ 2:18pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Mon Mar 26, 2007 @ 7:44pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Mon Mar 26, 2007 @ 7:47pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Tue Mar 27, 2007 @ 2:11am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Morphine replied on Tue Mar 27, 2007 @ 3:46pm |
yep. it was desert when the heathen jews began their "terrorist occupation" of it by buying the land off the "palestinians" who owned it (and who were only too happy to sell a useless plot of sand to a bunch of dumb jews). when they worked the land over and made it produce, all of a sudden the people who sold it wanted it back and claimed it was "stolen" from them. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Mar 27, 2007 @ 4:26pm |
So you're saying all the white area on the map was purchased legally..? | |
I'm feeling you up right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Tue Mar 27, 2007 @ 5:29pm |
maps like that are not telling the whole truth because gaza was egyptian and the west bank was jordinian... | |
I'm feeling surly right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue Mar 27, 2007 @ 9:56pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Trey replied on Thu Mar 29, 2007 @ 12:39pm |
Originally Posted By MORPHINE
yep. it was desert when the heathen jews began their "terrorist occupation" of it by buying the land off the "palestinians" who owned it (and who were only too happy to sell a useless plot of sand to a bunch of dumb jews). when they worked the land over and made it produce, all of a sudden the people who sold it wanted it back and claimed it was "stolen" from them. oh cool. that is probly the most misconstrue statement ever about the Middle-East in this forum. Congratulations on self delusion. One don't need to be a political science or history student to see how ridiculous that statement is. Yes that must be it, the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians sold the land to the Zionist and decide to move into refugees camp in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. First of all, the Arabs and Palestinians farmers who ancestors worked the land for generations didn't own the land. It was a few Arabs landlord who didn't even live there, and the Ottoman Sultan. When Ottaman was no more, the area now known as Israel and Palestine was under the British Mandate. The British open the Land Registry in 1920 i think. Due to the chaotic laws, corruption, and greed of far away Arabs landowners, they sold a few settlement land to the Jews. But it was very small amount of land, just a few thousand hectares, nothing like the State of Israel of today or even of 1946. The Zionists wanted their own Jewish State so they encouraged the Palestinians to move further east into the West Bank. They employ a few Arabs farmers, but the Palestinians who were there live in communal society and they weren't welcome anymore. Hundred of thousands of Palestinians were displaced as the Jews were displaced from Europe and Russia. The Jews first employ terrorist tactics against the British, to pressure for a Jewish State, then shifted their strategies against the Palestinians. Finally they took over the land since it was "abandoned". The land wans't deserted, Arabs were fleeing the violence. Yes there was Jewish terrorist groups such as the Irgun. The Arabs revolted, and the Brits just oppressed everyone. Israel is a terror state 'cause they are occupying a foreign land; West Bank and Gaza Strip which is against a UN resolution by the way for more than 30 years. They are building settlement illegaly in the Occupied territories. The surprising thing is, I spoke to a Palestian and he told me Palestinians were okay to live side by side with Israelis if they had their own Palestine State. But that isn't happening due to both camp extremist views and United States geopolitical agenda. |
This Could Get Bad...
[ Cumbre de Página ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Cumbre de Página ] |