Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Adresse électronique: Mot de passe:
Anonymous
Crée un compte
Mot de passe oublié?
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Bush Lawyer Compares Pot To Civil Rights
Title:US CA: Bush Lawyer Compares Pot To Civil Rights
Published On:2003-08-11
Source:The Dominion Post (WV)
Fetched On:2008-01-19 17:12:08
BUSH LAWYER COMPARES POT TO CIVIL RIGHTS

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- California and other states that want to make
marijuana available to sick or dying patients are flouting federal drug
laws in much the same way that Southern states defied national civil rights
laws, a senior Bush administration lawy er said.

California is ground zero in a long tug of war with the federal government
over the medical value of marijuana and the power of state governments and
voters to make exceptions for people who may benefit from the illegal drug.

Five major federal lawsuits involve those who grow, use or recommend
marijuana for medical use in California.

The Bush administration has asked the Supreme Court to settle the latest
fight by agreeing that Washington has the power to revoke medical licenses
of doctors who invoke state laws and recommend pot for their patients.

States cannot choose when to abide by federal law and when not to, Justice
Department lawyer Mark Quinlivan said Saturday.

"You cannot cherry-pick," said Quinlivan, the top federal trial lawyer in
three of the pending cases and a panelist at an American Bar Association
discussion of medical marijuana.

California voters passed Proposition 215 in 1996, legalizing marijuana for
medical use. Eight other states followed suit.

Federal law recognizes no medical purpose for the drug and bans its private
production, sale or use.

"There is a basic question of what power does California have," said lawyer
Gerald Uelman, Quinlivan's opponent in two cases. The federal law
regulating drugs "is not a federal takeover of the medical system" or the
duty of doctors to help the very ill, Uelman said.

Uelman and a California attorney general's office lawyer objected to the
civil rights analogy and the notion that California is asserting the same
kind of states' rights argument that Alabama used to try to avoid
desegregating its schools.

When government agents shut down marijuana growers who serve sick people,
it is "not acting with the same degree of moral propriety as it did to end
civil rights abuses," said Taylor Carey, a California special assistant
attorney general who wrote a friend-of-the-court brief backing medical
marijuana.

California's fight with Washington has extended through the Democratic
Clinton administration and the Republican Bush administration. The Supreme
Court ruled against an Oakland marijuana distribution club two years ago,
finding the federal drug law allows no exception for people to use pot to
ease pain from cancer, AIDS or other illnesses.
Commentaires des membres
Aucun commentaire du membre disponible...