DEAN LOSING SUPPORT ON LEFT FOR HIS STANCES ON ITS ISSUES

Howard Dean, who has rocketed to the front of the Democratic
presidential race with his outsider style and appeals to the anti-war
left, is facing a backlash from liberals who have come to believe he
does not share their views on some core issues.

Many single-issue activists who work on Middle East peace, gun control
and drug policy reform - including some who say they were initially
attracted to Dean - are becoming increasingly vocal in opposing him.
Some are speaking about a "reassessment" on the left and warn darkly
that Dean's stands are already costing him support among core Democrats.

"Howard Dean could be the worst of both worlds for progressives," said
Norman Solomon, a columnist and figure on the left on the West Coast.
"He's not a true progressive, but he's been tarred as being this kind
of Birkenstock leftist. What's the payoff here?"

Privately, Dean's supporters say that the opposition of activists such
as proponents of Palestinian rights can only help Dean by drawing a
bright line between him and the other candidate competing for the
hardcore anti-war vote, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio. To a certain
extent, their argument goes, a backlash from the left will aid Dean
when he needs to tack more to the center in some of the more
conservative primary states. Dean's rhetoric is already moving right:
In an August 15 speech to Iowa's Hawkeye Labor Council, he touted his
support for balanced budgets and the first Gulf War.

Some analysts think Dean will not lose that much support when people
look more closely at his stances, because his support on the left
comes more from "outsiders" than it does from "ideological" liberals -
perhaps an 80-20 split. His moderate stands on issues the left holds
dear will hurt him only if he is seen to have a credibility problem,
because he has staked so much on the image of himself as a straight
shooter.

"Only if the argument 'Howard Dean is a moderate' is commuted to
'Howard Dean is a phony' are his prospects fundamentally altered,"
said independent analyst Stuart Rothenberg.

The co-director of Campaign for America's Future, a left-liberal
group, Robert Borosage, agreed. "The love affair will have a
reassessment period," he said, "but a lot of progressives will stay
with him" because they see him as the only anti-war candidate with a
real shot at the nomination.

But other Democrats think Dean already painted himself into a corner
when he adopted the trademark liberal line, "I'm Howard Dean, and I'm
from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party," and courted the
voters who made him the winner of the online primary of MoveOn.org, a
left-leaning organization that organizes grassroots campaigns over the
Internet. The progressives who responded to the slogan "tend to be the
type of voters who want him to be [with them] 110% on every issue,"
said a strategist for a rival campaign, who likened the slogan and
Dean's straight-shooter image to "two logs going in the opposite direction."

Dean's campaign, for its part, professes to be unconcerned by any
opposition from the left.

"People who try to fix an ideological label on Howard Dean are making
a big mistake," Dean's policy director, Jeremy Ben-Ami, said. "There
is no ideological litmus test Howard Dean is looking to pass."

Ironically, the left-wing opposition to Dean is mainly organizing via
the Internet - the tool that catapulted Dean to the top ranks of
Democratic contenders. A Chicago activist who says he donated $500 to
Dean's campaign - the average Dean donation in the second quarter was
$112 - has gathered almost 600 signatures on an online petition
expressing "deep reservations" about Dean's Middle East positions,
which signers consider too pro-Israel. The petition was posted August
1 and is hosted at the Web site www.stop-us-military-aid-to-israel.net.

"As members of the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party, The Green
Party, Progressives, Independents, and other parties interested in
your candidacy, we would like to express our deep reservations
regarding your stated positions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,"
says the petition. Citing an interview Dean gave to the Forward in
November, in which he said his view on Middle East peace is "closer to
Aipac's view" than to the view of Peace Now, the petition practically
begs Dean to say it ain't so.

"As voters who wish to support your candidacy but have serious
concerns about your vision for the Middle East, we respectfully
request that a clarification be made on the issues cited above," the
petition states.

The moving force behind the petition, Chicago statistician Jon Bailey,
said it grew out of a Yahoo discussion group, Dean for Mideast Peace.
"There are some people who think Dean is to the right of Bush on this
issue," Bailey told the Forward. Bailey said he gave Dean's campaign
$500, but now he has thrown his support to Kucinich.

"There's a lot of people who signed the petition who said [to Dean],
'I gave you money, but you hurt me.' He didn't turn out to be what we
thought he was," he said.

Asked by the Forward to comment on the petition, Dean's campaign was
concerned enough about it to respond with a statement in the name of
the candidate. "I recognize both the special relationship the United
States has with Israel and the legitimate claim of the Palestinian
people to a state of their own," Dean said in the e-mail statement. "I
believe agreements satisfying both sides can be reached leading to two
states living side by side in security and peace. To get there,
Palestinians will have to crack down on terror and take real steps to
make democracy work, while Israel will have to give up some
settlements and ensure that the Palestinian quality of life improves.
If taking this position means I get attacked by people on both sides
of the argument, that's a good sign that I found a middle ground where
real compromise and agreement can be reached."

The pro-Palestinian crowd is not alone in wanting to stick it to Dean.
Gun control advocates are looking to shoot down his candidacy.

One of the nation's most prominent gun control campaigns is urging its
members and the public to reject Dean for his position that gun
control should be mostly a state matter. "Dean says he's from the
'Democrat wing of the Democratic party.' As far as gun safety
advocates are concerned, give us a Democrat from some other wing of
the Democratic Party, please," wrote the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun
Violence/Million Mom March in a press release.

"Some of our members, including suburban women - who are going to be
important to any presidential campaign - have said they were initially
attracted to Dean, but his views on gun control have given them second
thoughts," said Tony Orza, director of government relations for the
Brady Campaign.

Advocates of drug-sentencing reform and medical marijuana initiatives
say Dean has a poor record on their issues, too, and claim that his
stances will hurt him in certain states, such as California, where
many voters support such initiatives.

Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, gives
Dean points for criticizing the drug war and federal mandatory minimum
sentencing, but said "a lot of people find his drug policy record
disconcerting and disappointing."

"On the two issues that came to his desk [in Vermont] - medical
marijuana and methadone maintenance - he went out of his way to do the
wrong thing," Nadelmann said, adding that in certain respects his
record was "worse than most... Democrats and many Republicans."

That assessment is shared by Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana, a
New Hampshire Web site that rates candidates on the issue. It gave
Dean an "F+" - the lowest grade it gave to any Democratic candidate,
according to information at www.stopthedrug-war.com.

The effort that stands to gain the most from any battering Dean might
take for not being a true progressive is the campaign of Massachusetts
Senator John Kerry. A Kerry adviser described Dean's conundrum
delicately: "While Dean has done a good job tapping into an angry
vein, ultimately people are looking for a candidate with the vision to
move the country forward," Chris Lehane said. "What do Democrats
really stand for? John Kerry has fought those fights."