Anti-Rave Law
|
 Coolness: 144370
| |
|
 Coolness: 685730
| You should hear about the other anti-rave laws that are being proposed. It would be illegal to sell water bottles at an establishment that prominently plays music. Glow-sticks, phat-pants, susses, etc (candy gear pretty much) would constitute drug paraphenelia and be cause enough for a search without warant and confiscation of said paraphenelia. |
|
Coolness: 144370
| so if i see someone wearing a ruff ryders chain and phat farm does it mean they sell weed? what is this fuckery? |
|
 Coolness: 339805
| "that was passed in Chicago and other major cities"
well at least it doesn't affect us.. (yet).. what with canada being America Junior when it comes to laws. |
|
Coolness: 685730
| No, see because weed dealers with guns aren't the threat, it's the friendly happy candykids on E that are a REAL threat to society. It's like Bart thought when explained what re-incarnation was... "No one suspects the butterfly! Mouahahahahahahahaha" |
|
Coolness: 339805
| "But it was the butterfly!! The BUUTTERFLY!!!"
-skinner |
|
 Coolness: 116435
| hmm i dunno i click on one of the pages and red comments of people who voted and its all pro rave comments, i kind of dont understand... |
|
Coolness: 144370
| ya, i know. i put a "vote" but in the comment part i told them " take your petiton and shove it up your ass. plur." but the sad thing is, is that i think it counts as a vote anyways. so i think i just voted to out-law raves in that city. even if i wrote my name as fuck you. 0Ops...? |
|
Coolness: 133750
| ha ha ha
reason #1 that toronto is better than mtl: we can have parties all the time. (that's the only reason i have)
throw an i-dance (a free rave protest around city hall, we did and now we can do what we want) |
|
Coolness: 144370
| ya...but what do you mean ya'll can have parties anywhere? |
|
Coolness: 49190
| Wisp, your vote does not legally count as it does not have your signature
and frankly im not sure if only petitions are trully regarded by the gvn't as real at all... |
|
Coolness: 144370
| then that whole petiton is bullshit since there are no hand written signatures?? |
|
 Coolness: 276575
| naw man in t.o. theres like 5 places to throw parties. |
|
 Coolness: 299465
| Last year toronto was worse than montreal, then the paradise incident happened... |
|
Coolness: 60
| you see what you all have to start doing is start calling raves (parties) becuase all the hunky asses out there think right away that all ravers do drugs and get killed and OD at raves. but at parties nothing like that can ever happen LOL yeahright. like for a good example i'm putting togather a party in kahnawake. it a rave but it not called a rave it called a party because if i said rave they would have told me NO right off the batt. there are many way around it. if want you can call it a privet party give out inventations and you have to have them to get in the do. and you can also have a mandatory donation. (AKA cover) |
|
 Coolness: 201365
| they should bust people in all ecko gear, not candy gear. The candykids are just the drug buyers, they should be busting the dealers... |
|
 Coolness: 47860
| "You should hear about the other anti-rave laws that are being proposed. It would be illegal to sell water bottles at an establishment that prominently plays music. Glow-sticks, phat-pants, susses, etc (candy gear pretty much) would constitute drug paraphenelia and be cause enough for a search without warant and confiscation of said paraphenelia."
okay so if ur wearing phat pants, and its considered paraphanalia, then do they "confiscate" ur pants? isnt it worse to be wearing no pants? |
|
Coolness: 144370
| ya then on top of being arrested for suspiciosness you'll get arrested for indescent exposure... |
|
Coolness: 685730
| I'm guessing it means if you wear phat pants you are displaying drug paraphenelia and it gives them the PC they need to search you. |
|
Coolness: 276575
| hmmm nakid ravers.. this could be interesting:b |
Anti-Rave Law
Vous devez être connecté pour soumettre une réponse.
