Depanneur Atm'S!
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» greatjob a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 10:58am |
 Coolness: 282410 | NOT AGAIN! MOTHERFUCKER!
Feb 02 - ATM Withdrawal - 101.85$ Feb 02 - ATM Withdrawal - 101.85$ Remaining Balance: 19.00$ These fucking no speeky english motherfuckers ATM machine DUPED my fuckin transaction! Now I'm broke and can't do anything...great. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» SourUltraFast a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 11:02am |
 Coolness: 91345 | Don't forget that ATM also stand as Ass To Mouth...
just sayin' |
| I'm feeling visa blahblah right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nemorave a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 11:05am |
 Coolness: 88990 | Originally Posted By HOST_ONE
NOT AGAIN! MOTHERFUCKER! Feb 02 - ATM Withdrawal - 101.85$ Feb 02 - ATM Withdrawal - 101.85$ Remaining Balance: 19.00$ These fucking no speeky english motherfuckers ATM machine DUPED my fuckin transaction! Now I'm broke and can't do anything...great. just call up you bank they'll reverse the second charge |
| I'm feeling what wath in da butt right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Intoccabile a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 12:18pm |
 Coolness: 64805 | Happened to me. It fucking sucks ! I swear I'm never using one of these ATM's again. It takes forever to get your money back. Go see a customer service rep. at your bank before they close today. Tell them to check the transactions in your account. If you kept your transaction receipts that's even better. |
| I'm feeling g.r.i.m.e.y. right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» greatjob a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 12:21pm |
| Coolness: 282410 | I'm waiting for a call, I told them exactly what happened and I'm sure they'll replace the 100$
it's just like, fuck you, thanks for wasting my fuckin day. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Turtle a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 12:40pm |
 Coolness: 68260 | that's why i don't use dep atm's .......Even if i have to walk to the bank i will.... |
| I'm feeling upeoplesuck right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Lone_Star a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 5:54pm |
 Coolness: 153010 | I'm pretty sure very angry people invented ATMs. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nathan a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 5:58pm |
 Coolness: 166500 | ATM ---> ANGER TOO MUCH!
:P |
| I'm feeling you up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 6:03pm |
 Coolness: 159075 | Absolutely Terrible Machine |
| I'm feeling like marcus phenix right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 7:03pm |
 Coolness: 131550 | you shure the atm phone line wasnt splice or had a strange box on it.
only on [ rave.ca ] can you have 2 submission processed from one. report em or add your own :D |
| I'm feeling univox u2048 *x2* right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» the_big_jo a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 7:03pm |
 Coolness: 56540 | NO, it's a connection error. It can happen. |
| I'm feeling christmas cheer right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 7:14pm |
| Coolness: 131550 | connection error .
how broad, can you explain me why it didnt dump the last transaction ? a taped recorder , playback can do that thou. esp. i understand its not hosts' first whip. i gess they cant manage their security levels and transaction order. |
| I'm feeling univox u2048 *x2* right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» the_big_jo a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 10:12pm |
| Coolness: 56540 | An Interac transaction takes 3 steps to complete:
1. The transaction info is sent from the ATM to it's processor. 2. The processor generates a response 3. The processor sends a response code to the ATM. (either approved or declined) If the transaction is interrupted after the the processor has generated the approval message and authorized the transaction, the transaction will still go through. It's called a cyclical redundancy error. |
| I'm feeling christmas cheer right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nathan a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 10:14pm |
| Coolness: 166500 | i think he's sayin' that the atm may have been tampered with for id theft purposes or something...it happens. but i guess it's less likely... .. . |
| I'm feeling you up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» clown a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 10:26pm |
 Coolness: 221720 | actually, i think he works, or worked, for an ATM company.. :P |
| I'm feeling white flaging right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Lone_Star a répondu le Fri 6 Feb, 2009 @ 10:43pm |
| Coolness: 153010 | Right you are. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cutterhead a répondu le Sat 7 Feb, 2009 @ 12:10pm |
| Coolness: 131550 | a crc error would be dumped by the server itself.
that atm is not a bank atm and it shows, transaction steps were skipped where in bank ones the assertion is properly configured. so either tampered on spot or mailordered that ways its still not a machine that should be integrated on the network. abothside authorisation has to be double handshake in order to be accepted. why again did it skiped that step -ON ITS OWN- ? not like its a computer your pulling the wires out from everyday for your needs . this is a setup box that should have been patched to NEVER do that error or at least flag its in crc error and dump the whole transaction all together. |
| I'm feeling univox u2048 *x2* right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» the_big_jo a répondu le Sat 7 Feb, 2009 @ 1:56pm |
| Coolness: 56540 | For an interac transaction, once the approval message has been generated by the processor , it's too late, the funds have already been transferred from one account to the other, and the connection between the server and the back-end processor has been closed. Regardless of whether or not that approval message makes it all the way to the atm.
BTW, if you think you can correct this problem, the entire processing industry would consider you the messiah. Because this exact type of error happens all the time, no matter which processor. And it's absolutely no indication that fraud was comitted. |
| I'm feeling christmas cheer right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Sat 7 Feb, 2009 @ 2:01pm |
 Coolness: 685545 | Originally Posted By THE_BIG_JO
For an interac transaction, once the approval message has been generated by the processor , it's too late, the funds have already been transferred from one account to the other, and the connection between the server and the back-end processor has been closed. Regardless of whether or not that approval message makes it all the way to the atm. BTW, if you think you can correct this problem, the entire processing industry would consider you the messiah. Because this exact type of error happens all the time, no matter which processor. And it's absolutely no indication that fraud was comitted. Is it really that hard to have it only release the funds from the account after a second "Ok we got your authorisation that this guy's got the funds in his account" is sent? Like... enter PIN into machine, confirm your $20.00 transaction with the pad... Currently it's going: ATM: Ok this guy wants $20, is that cool? Bank: Yeah, he's got the funds, here you go! *ATM has left the conversation* *Bank releases funds* Whereas it should go ATM: Ok this guy wants $20, is that cool? Bank: Yeah, he's got the funds. Want me to release them? ATM: Yup! *ATM counts money* ATM: Got it, thanks! *Bank releases funds* |
| I'm feeling your norks right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope a répondu le Sat 7 Feb, 2009 @ 2:08pm |
 Coolness: 201180 | I only use my own bank's atms, the fees are outrageous otherwise, and the third party (non-bank) atms suck shit |
| I'm feeling over 9000 right now.. | |
Depanneur Atm'S!
[ Haut de la page ] |
Poster Une Réponse |
Vous devez être connecté pour soumettre une réponse.
[ Haut de la page ] |
