WHAT'S SO SCARY ABOUT MARIJUANA?

Our nation's drug czar is annoyed. If proponents have their way, the
District of Columbia will vote later this year to legalize marijuana
for medicinal purposes for the second time. John P. Walters, director
of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, took some pot shots at
the issue in a recent Washington Post piece. Unfortunately, he brings
more smoke than light.

"After years of giggling at quaintly outdated marijuana scare stories
like the 1936 movie 'Reefer Madness,'" he writes, "we've become almost
conditioned to think that any warning about the true dangers of
marijuana are overblown."

He then proceeds with unintended irony to give an "overblown" warning
of his own about "The Myth of 'Harmless' Marijuana."

He warns baby boomer parents that "today's marijuana is different from
that of a generation ago, with potency levels 10 to 20 times stronger
than the marijuana with which they were familiar."

He doesn't say where he gets that whopper of a statistic and that's
too bad, since it conflicts with a federally funded investigation of
marijuana samples confiscated by law enforcement over the past two
decades. Published in the January 2000, Journal of Forensic Science,
that study found the THC content (that's the active ingredient that
gets you high) had only doubled to 4.2 percent from about 2 percent
from 1980 to 1997.

Those are not undesirable potency levels when you are using it to
relieve illness. Thousands of patients suffering from HIV, glaucoma,
chemotherapy, migraines, multiple sclerosis or other similarly painful
or nauseating conditions could benefit from legalized marijuana use,
according to the Washington-based Marijuana Policy Project.

Yes, marijuana is dangerous. So are cigarettes, liquor and
prescription drugs. The question Walters fails to address is why
marijuana should be treated differently from those other drugs?

Doctors treat the ill with numerous prescription drugs that are more
dangerous and addictive than marijuana. But they are not allowed to
treat the ill with marijuana, even though many wish they could.

Instead, thousands of Americans have become criminals by purchasing
marijuana rather than seeing their loved ones suffer.

So far, eight states have legalized medical use of marijuana by ballot
initiative or legislation. District of Columbia voters also passed a
referendum in 1998, but it has been blocked by Congress. Where
referendums have been held, they have passed. But, alas, Walters is
following in the path of past drug czars who feel they know what's
better for voters than the voters themselves do.

Walters dismisses those initiatives as "based on pseudo-science."
Maybe he did not read the 1999 report by the Institute of Medicine, a
branch of the National Academy of Sciences. It confirmed the
effectiveness of marijuana's active components in treating pain,
nausea and the anorexic-wasting syndrome associated with AIDS.

Walters says we should wait for more information. He praises a study
now underway at the University of California's Center for Medicinal
Cannabis Research. But, if that study doesn't come out the way Walters
would like, you have to wonder, will he ignore that one, too?

"By now most Americans realize that the push to 'normalize' marijuana
for medical use is part of the drug legalization agenda," he says,
mentioning financier George Soros and others who have contributed to
the legalization cause. Walters does not mention the billions of tax
dollars that he, as drug czar, has at his disposal to push marijuana
myths -- with our tax money!

Instead, Walters arouses our passions by recounting the lawlessness of
violent marijuana-dealing street gangs in the District. If anything,
pot gangs offer us another good reason to legalize marijuana. After
all, when a drug is outlawed, only outlaws will have the drug.