Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php on line 5

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 546

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 547

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 548
US CA: Column: The Pseudo-Expose - Rave.ca
Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Column: The Pseudo-Expose
Title:US CA: Column: The Pseudo-Expose
Published On:2005-11-16
Source:Anderson Valley Advertiser (CA)
Fetched On:2008-01-15 08:14:06
THE PSEUDO-EXPOSE

"all he believes are his eyes, And his eyes just tell him lies..." -Bob Dylan

The corporate media has created a totally false impression about the
extent to which California's medical marijuana law has been
implemented. They use a simple trick: show "how easy it is to get a
card" and ignore the fact that relatively few people have done so,
due to countervailing pressures. This Spring, Oakland's KTVU did a
pseudo-expose along these lines, and in the ensuing months a reporter
from every other station in the Bay Area has gone "undercover" into a
doctor's office, described a medical problem (real or faked), gotten
a letter of approval and then a card, taken it to a dispensary, and
obtained marijuana.

This week the assignment fell to Mike Sugerman of KCBS "Eyewitness News."

An Anchor Person provided the intro: "We have repeatedly heard about
the debate about medical marijuana.

Under state law it is legal, but only sick people, under a doctor's
supervision, are supposed to be able to get it. So you'd think
getting a medical marijuana card would be rather difficult..." Cut to
Sugerman, who is middle-aged, wiry, balding, wears glasses, getting
out of bed and being droll: 3Back aches, joints hurt, I don't know
why. Maybe it's my bed. I could buy a new mattress.

Maybe it's my shoes.

I could get a new insole.

I could smoke some pot... (walking into an office building) I went to
one of those places in Oakland. Paid a hundred and fifty dollars.

A nurse practitioner talked to me about my aches.

I got the okay... (showing his newly obtained card) The doctor's
order allows me to get one of these: a cannabis buyer's card which
allow you to purchase marijuana at any pot club in the state of California..."

Sugerman interviewed a presumably valid patient -a man of 70 who has
a serious heart condition- and a young man outside a dispensary who
presumably had taken advantage of the law by obtaining "weed,
brownies, all that stuff." The young man's manner was streetwise and
macho, but the content of his rap was medical: "...To relax your body
after a long, hard day at work. And all those chronic pains. I been
in the construction field for three years. So, you know, I mean, I
got a sore body."

Next Sugerman talked with "Dr. Thomas O'Connell [who] preaches almost
any conditions can be helped with pot." Cut to O'Connell saying, "I
don't turn anyone down... I haven't really encountered anybody I
thought was hurt by pot." Sugerman adds: "That puts him at odds with
the federal government, which still considers marijuana dangerous and illegal.

And other research which shows that marijuana can have adverse
effects on the brain, heart, and respiratory system..."

Tracking shot of Sugerman and a middle-class woman walking down Fair
Oaks Street with a schoolyard in the background. She's complaining
about her neighborhood being overrun by people buying marijuana at a
nearby club. Sugerman concludes: "As for me, I decided not to try the
marijuana I could now legally buy. Despite what others say, my
personal doctor says pot is a vasoconstrictor and can raise my
already high blood pressure.

Maybe I'll just try those shoe inserts. See if they can help my back."

According to Dr. O'Connell Sugerman recorded but didn't use "a
careful Statement of my position on medical use... What I actually
said was that I had yet to encounter anyone using it chronically in
the pattern disclosed as typical by my applicant profile who would
have been better off if forced to give it up. Also, that none of the
many alternative drugs most had tried during their adolescence was
either as safe or effective.

I also said that many who had been prescribed pharmaceutical
alternatives for the same symptoms had given them up, but that I was
very careful not to advise applicants to do so because I wasn't
following or treating them as patients."

By all estimates, fewer than 200,000 Californians have obtained
approval to use cannabis medicinally in the nine years since it
became legal -in a state where millions might benefit if they felt
free to try. That's the real story -the disimplementation of Prop
215. More than five million adult Californians voted for Prop 215 in
the privacy of a voting booth (an antiquated image, alas). All but a
few are too embarrassed or too scared to ask their own doctor for a
recommendation. The real story is the doctors' fear and lack of
education re cannabis, resulting in only a small fraction of their
patients getting to use it legally.

The Sheriff's "Joke"

"Alameda County Sheriff Charles Plummer has a doctor's letter stating
on-the-job stress should qualify him to buy marijuana for medical
needs," begins a recent article by Karen Holzmeister of the Oakland
Tribune. Tod Mikuriya, MD, read the lead and thought Plummer deserved
credit for a groundbreaking gesture. Then he read on: "As a joke,
Plummer's physician wrote the note, which the sheriff showed to
members of the district attorney's office.

They agreed the letter would be Plummer's ticket to getting a card
that would open doors at any of the six cannabis dispensaries in
unincorporated areas."

You don't have to be a psychiatrist to know that things people say
"as a joke" can reveal below-the-surface concerns.

Being sheriff of a mostly urban county in an era of social breakdown
is a stressful job, indeed. Either Plummer's doctor didn't think the
request was a total joke, or s/he made an ethical stretch in signing
a letter approving his use of cannabis. According to the Tribune,
"After touring all the clinics [in Alameda County's unincorporated
areas], Plummer said he can't see himself queuing up alongside
patients who appear to be 'unsavory people' and 'young men under 30
who look like people you would arrest a lot."

It's understandable that the subset of Californians who have sought a
doctor's approval to medicate with cannabis includes a high
percentage of the young, brave, macho, and poor. Middle-aged,
middle-class people are more likely to have jobs, families, interests
to protect.

Many become "risk averse," too embarrassed to ask their regular
physician to approve cannabis use, and afraid that going to a
specialist might result in negative consequences with an employer, an
insurance company, a family court judge, etc. Not to mention the government.

Nine years after the passage of Prop 215, law enforcement's ongoing
opposition has led to this: a middle-aged professional can't find a
dispensary where he'd feel comfortable stopping by after work to see
what strains are recommended for stress.

What the sheriff sees as a diminution of his power to control the
citizenry, the doctor sees as a positive. Mikuriya says, "Whatever
other benefits a doctor may help a patient obtain by approving their
cannabis use, the conferring of legitimacy is a benefit of the utmost
importance for their well-being."
Member Comments
No member comments available...