Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
News (Media Awareness Project) - US SC: Tentative Deal Set In Drug-Sweep Lawsuit
Title:US SC: Tentative Deal Set In Drug-Sweep Lawsuit
Published On:2005-12-22
Source:Sun News (Myrtle Beach, SC)
Fetched On:2008-01-14 20:25:37
Settlement

TENTATIVE DEAL SET IN DRUG-SWEEP LAWSUIT

CHARLESTON - Stratford High School students who were in a hallway two
years ago when officers conducted a drug sweep with guns drawn would
share a couple of million dollars under a tentative settlement agreement.

But lawyers on both sides caution the deal is far from done.

"Ultimately, the whole thing could fall apart," said Gregg Meyers, a
lawyer for students who were in the hallway at the time. "This is a
work in progress."

After the Nov. 5, 2003, drug search, 62 students and their families
sued the Goose Creek Police Department and Berkeley County School
District, claiming the sweep violated their constitutional rights.
U.S. District Judge Michael Duffy combined two federal lawsuits into
one in March 2004 and appointed a mediator.

Previous settlement negotiations have broken down. The most recent
talks started in August.

The before-school search turned up no drugs or weapons and officers
made no arrests. But it triggered a national debate about the
appropriate tactics for curbing student drug trafficking and use.
Surveillance video of the sweep broadcast nationwide showed police
ordering students to the floor, a student tackled by police and a
barking police dog searching backpacks near cowering students.

"I think the agreement is an admission that police and school
officials went too far that day," said Fritz Jekel, another lawyer
for the students.

Duke Highfield, a lawyer representing the district, said: "There is
no admission of fault by anyone. That's not the purpose of the settlement."

The proposed agreement would divide students into two groups: the
students listed in the combined lawsuit, including some who sought
medical treatment and counseling, and roughly 70 other students in
the hallway that morning who have not filed lawsuits.

The proposal would give students up to $15,000 each, depending on
specific experiences and how many ultimately participate.

"Some are trying to decide if they're happy about it," Meyers said.
"We felt comfortable recommending it."

Students could decide to opt out of the settlement. How many do that,
and why, will determine whether the deal holds up.

The defendants' goal is to get the matter settled for good and not
face more lawsuits in the future.

"The school district would like to have the manner resolved," Highfield said.

After the sweep, the school board created a committee of parents and
residents to review its drug search procedures. The changes, adopted
in February 2004, limit searches to a specific area, require that
only trained and reliable police dogs be used and prohibit physical
contact between dogs and students. It also requires school officials
to make a "reasonable attempt" to contact students' parents before
any interrogation.

The case was scheduled to go to trial in the spring. If these
negotiations break down, lawyers would ask for more time to prepare.

62 students and their families sued the Goose Creek Police Department
and Berkeley County School District, claiming the sweep violated
their constitutional rights.
Member Comments
No member comments available...