Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
mdc's Profile - Community Messages
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 266 Next »»
» mdc replied on Tue May 2, 2006 @ 10:59pm. Posted in HABS are Fucking losers.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
bleh.. it was a crusty goal .... crusty and a half
» mdc replied on Mon May 1, 2006 @ 3:30pm. Posted in We May Have to Bomb Iran.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
» mdc replied on Sun Apr 30, 2006 @ 12:24pm. Posted in Unconditional Love.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...
Conclusion, he's an egomaniac who thinks he's better than everyone else cause he thinks he knows what love really is and everyone else is wrong.


eeeeeeeeeeeeeexactly
» mdc replied on Sun Apr 30, 2006 @ 12:19pm. Posted in Anyone know Pablo Otto Pina ??.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
[ findaperson.canada411.ca ]

Pina, Pablo
7475 Rue Rousselot
Montreal, QC H2E 1Z2
(514) 495-8044
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 26, 2006 @ 1:02pm. Posted in The Secret Behind China's Economy .
mdc
Coolness: 148810
meh
» mdc replied on Sat Apr 22, 2006 @ 1:56pm. Posted in Do Meth / Shoot 12 nails into your head.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
gross
» mdc replied on Fri Apr 21, 2006 @ 12:30pm. Posted in Word Mutilation.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
"Right Away Son!" The Admiral Flapped. "Alright," Replied Isaac.
» mdc replied on Fri Apr 21, 2006 @ 11:44am. Posted in I Hate . . ..
mdc
Coolness: 148810
exams
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 20, 2006 @ 12:33pm. Posted in Article.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
its like a family gethering in here
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 20, 2006 @ 12:32pm. Posted in Word Mutilation.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Varieties Outrun A Roll :b
Varieties Run Our Atoll
Oral Varieties Turn Lou!!

Ultrarevolutionaries (c)
Annoyed with your government? Call Ultrarevolutionaries today!
We'll stage a coup faster than you can say Ultrarevolutionaries.
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 20, 2006 @ 12:26pm. Posted in Word Mutilation.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Now...
Ultrarevolutionaries

go.
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 20, 2006 @ 12:25pm. Posted in Word Mutilation.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Creepy Elderly Ladies Lie Open-Pussied Hoping (for) A Nimble Erection?
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 20, 2006 @ 12:22pm. Posted in Word Mutilation.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by ZE`EV ...

p.S. Dino that was awesome dude.

Thanks :b


Now.. CELLOPHANE

Lace Phone L.


Conscious Endotherms Limit Loud Obscenities. Potentially Heralding A New Era.
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 20, 2006 @ 1:59am. Posted in Word Mutilation.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Does Every Xylophonist Train Rigorously Over Midterm Exams To Helplessly Overanalyse Replays Played Hourly And Neverendingly

Thorax Termed Phon
Home Ph.D Extra Torn

Doctors Ease Xenophobia Through Relentless Over-Medication. Ending The Horrible, Overly Racist People's Hate And Nervousness
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 19, 2006 @ 6:12pm. Posted in What are you listening to right now?.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Incantevole - Subsonica
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 19, 2006 @ 4:56pm. Posted in Unconditional Love.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
all i have to say is
balls

nothing further
» mdc replied on Sun Apr 16, 2006 @ 1:04pm. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
hmmm.... the knights and knaves one...
i think it might be (2/3)*1995 + 2 = 1332 knights and 663 knaves
i havent gone through it all yet... gotta think more...
» mdc replied on Sun Apr 16, 2006 @ 4:41am. Posted in Marry/Fuck/Kill.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
id fuck kalista , marry john, and kill candace
» mdc replied on Sun Apr 16, 2006 @ 4:38am. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by BASDINI...

new one

To move their armies, the Romans built over 50,000 miles of roads. Imagine driving all those miles! Now imagine driving those miles in the first gasoline-driven car that has only three wheels and could reach a top speed of about 10 miles per hour.
For safety's sake, let's bring along a spare tire. As you drive the 50,000 miles, you rotate the spare with the other tires so that all four tires get the same amount of wear. Can you figure out how many miles of wear each tire accumulates?


3/4 of 50,000
37,500 miles
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 13, 2006 @ 1:49pm. Posted in Natural Light to reinvent Light Bulb.
mdc
Coolness: 148810

[url=news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4837728.stm]Light Bulbs: Not a Bright Idea?

Until now they have been unable to generate sufficient light to illuminate a room.

To create the new material, the scientists build up ultra-thin layers of plastics coated with green, red and blue dyes.

When an electric current passes through them, they combine to produce white light.

Previous attempts to make OLEDs like this have largely failed to make an impact because traditional phosphorescent blue dyes are very short lived.

The new polymer uses a fluorescent blue material instead which lasts much longer and uses less energy.

The researchers believe that eventually this material could be 100% efficient, meaning it could be capable of converting all of the electricity to light, without the heat loss associated with traditional bulbs.

The new material can also be printed onto glass or plastic and so in theory could create large areas of lighting, relatively cheaply.

Before this becomes a reality, the scientists need to work out a way to seal the OLEDs from moisture which can contaminate the sensitive material, causing it to no longer work.

If that barrier can be overcome, the new polymer could eventually become the material of choice for stylish, environmentally friendly lighting.

The research team incorporated members from Princeton University, the University of Southern California and the University of Michigan.

Copyright [url=news.bbc.co.uk">BBC News
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 13, 2006 @ 1:43pm. Posted in low GST = bye bye trees.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
k.. the whole subsidising bus fares... gay
i mean, if it was purely about money, EVERYONE would ride the bus.. it's GUARANTEED cheaper tahn driving.
thats a stupid program altogether

also, cuts to envirenment = bad
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 13, 2006 @ 1:41pm. Posted in Marry/Fuck/Kill.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
id fuck sheryl crow
marry jean chretien
and kill keanu
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 13, 2006 @ 1:40pm. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
apparently i like pills... look at me with the pill questions
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 13, 2006 @ 1:40pm. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
the one from die hard was too easy
hmmmm....
let me think now...
a hard one

you have bags, any number of bags, n
with, lets say, an infinite number of pills in them (for the sake of the riddle... i know its impossible)
regular pills weigh x, and contaminated pills weigh 2x
there is an unknown number of contaminated bags, m
with one weighing on a scale, how can you tell which bags are contaminated.
» mdc replied on Thu Apr 13, 2006 @ 1:36pm. Posted in Calendar.Google.com.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
its great
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 7:01pm. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
itll still be warmer than the one that was never switched on
either way, he makes no reference to the type of bulb . so i can assume a "light bulb" refers to a regular incandescant light bulb
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 2:35pm. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

what if it's a fluorescant bulb? those don't heat up..


You worked at Velan with me. Our job was to change fluorescent light bulbs. We wore gloves because they were hot.
Do you not remember that?
Of course they heat up. Just not as much.

The most efficient light bulbs still only produce light with (about) 10% of the energy put into them. The remaining 90% is heat.
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 10:42am. Posted in The Picture Thread....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
props on the Calvin and Hobbes tee
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 10:39am. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
no wait.. you can tell afer pulling one marble
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 10:36am. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by BASDINI...

here is good one my mother told me this one, this one is a question that is found on university science program entrance tests alot of the time

There are two rooms. One has three lights and the other has three switches. Bob starts out in the room with the switches. He is alone. He can not see the room with the lights. Once he leaves the the switches room, the door closes and locks. How does Bob figure out which light goes to which switch?


he switched one lightbulb on for a minute or two, then closes it. he then switches another one.
He goes to the other room. the one that is on obviously goes with the bulb that's on. he then touches the other two bulbs. the ones that's hot goes with the switch he turned on then off. and the ones that off. well.. it goes ith the other one
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 10:34am. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by DJNEOFORM...

Originally posted by mdc...

I'm sure I'm missing something. But this is my initial guess...


yup, you are. read it again real closely.


oh right.. the labels!
there are already incorrect labels on teh containers!!!

you can tell after you pull one marble from each
since only 3 containers, that means three labels.
if ALL THREE are labelled wrong, you can instantly tell what the right labels are if you know even ONE.
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 1:13am. Posted in The Aircraft Game.
mdc
Coolness: 148810




-Built by the winner of a competition held by the US Navy to develop a day/night, all-weather, long-range, low-level, jet-powered attack aircraft
-Sacrifices speed and maneuverability for exceptional bombing accuracy and payload capacity
-Built by Grumann
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 1:08am. Posted in The Aircraft Game.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
B-1B Lancer

Now for my airplane....
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 1:02am. Posted in riddles.
mdc
Coolness: 148810
hmmmmmmmm... interesting concept.

Well, to begin with, you would select one marble from container one. From that marble, you can tell immediately which container it is NOT. (if you pull a red marble, it is not the full blue container)

But you cannot tell all three containers.

Pulling one marble out from each of the other two containers, you can tell with certainty, the correct label for at least one container. (if you pulled two blues and one red, then the full red container is the one the red came from...)

Now, to determine the label of the other two. I think you would have to pull out exactly 50% of the marbles from either of the two remaning containers.

I'm sure I'm missing something. But this is my initial guess...
» mdc replied on Wed Apr 12, 2006 @ 12:50am. Posted in Y do u think Alcohol , tobacco ....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by POISONED CANDY...

Originally posted by mdc...

ugh...
think about what you're going to write before writing it please.
im tired of reading ridiculous posts

to reiterate my last post for those french-deficient readers:
it's because they are legal that alcohol and cigarettes have probelms associated to them. if pot or e were legal, their consumption would be much greater and teh problems associated to them would be just as great (if not greater) than those associated with alcohol and cigs. everyone has access to alcohol and cigs and gambling, if everyone had access to hard drugs, there would certainly be more problems associated with these.


You're making two huge assumptions here, which may very well be false.

Assumption #1 - Making pot or E legal would increase their consumption

This isn't neccesarily true. People have many other reasons why they choose to use or not use a substance other than its legality. In fact, making something illegal might cause its use to rise since people could do it as a form of rebellion or do make a badass image for themselves.

Nowdays, more young people are trying pot than cigarretes, DESPITE the fact that pot is illegal and more expensive. Furthermore, studies have shown that kids binge drink more often at the ages of 16-17 when alcohol is less available to them, than they do at ages 18+ when its legal to drink. Finally, even though pot is quasi-legal and widely available in Amserdam, the prevalance of use is not greater there than in a culturally similar American city.

So your assumption that legalization = increased use just doesn't hold up.

Assumption #2: Cigarettes and alchohol are safer than illegal drugs, its only b/c they are more widely used that their are more problems

Despite the overwhelming proportion of all substance-related deaths that are a result of drinking and smoking, you do have a point that obviously you have to adjust for the number of people that drink or smoke vs. the number that use other drugs.

Even adjusting for this number, however, you'll likely find that of all the drugs that one can possibly use, legal or illegal, alcohol and tobacco are among the worst:

- tobacco is the most addictive substance known to man, more so than heroin, crystal meth, or cocaine

- alcohol is about as addictive than cocaine, and four times more addictive than LSD, ecstasy, or pot

- trying to stop heavy drinking can result in withdrawal symptoms leading to death, one of the few drugs for which this is true

So, your second assumption is false as well - the reason why alcohol and tobacco cause so many deaths is not only because they are widely used, but because they are all also two of the very worst drugs available, both legal or otherwise.


a few quick points.
Tobacco... not addictive. Nicotine is. But that was probably a quick-typing error.
Next, the binge drinking when you're younger thing. Yeah, that holds when you do, indeed, gain access to alcohol at a younger age. I have plenty of friends who refused to drink until they were well over 18 and it is only once they began to drink that the binge drinking would commence. The age isn't the factor, but the time elapsed from the beginning of your drinking life.
As for weed being tried more than tobacco. You have to look at the cultural and evironmental reasons behind this. Tobacco, a widely used drug, has been getting a bad rep. lately (rightfully). And therefore, there are thousands of ad campaigns against their use. (as much as you would like to refute that ads have an effect on you they do if youre bombarded with them from a young age) So kids are quickly turned away from tobacco. Even at a young age.
Weed, on the other hand, has been given a positive spin as of late due to people wanting its legalisation. And it is also very prevalent in contemporary (deemed) cool things. Such as music, videogames, movies, television. More songs now refer to smoking weed now than ever before. My 8 year old cousin sings songs about being high and he doesn't even know what that means yet (or does he?). So the cultural influences play a HUGE part in that.

Moving along.
You're claiming that even if an adjustment was made for the (much) more widespread use of drugs, the negative effects of these would still pale in comparison to cigs or alcohol? I highly doubt that. Assuming all other things equal, if you were to assume that the same number of people smoked as took e (and as often, the amount consumed has to be taken into consideration too, cigarettes are a SLOW killer), I am fairly certain there would many more deaths from so called "hard" drugs as alcohol and cigs. People driving drunk is bad. Imagine driving on e??

anyway. these are all just my speculations. in no way are these things fact.
» mdc replied on Tue Apr 11, 2006 @ 2:44pm. Posted in Y do u think Alcohol , tobacco ....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
if anything this Opium Act is what began the trafficing of illegal drugs through the netherlands. since there is a list of drugs in the appendix of the article that are illegal (defined hard drugs), this gave rise to the "designer drug" market. wherein a drug trafficker slightly modifies the molecular structure of teh drug to conform with the laws of the netherlands but the effects of the drugs are still as powerful as the illegal ones.
» mdc replied on Tue Apr 11, 2006 @ 2:39pm. Posted in Y do u think Alcohol , tobacco ....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Marijuana is not legal in the Netherlands. The possession of any soft drug is still a misdemeanor. As stated in the Opium Act (Law of 12 May 1928, containing regulations concerning opium and other narcotic substances).
And it was not to stop the traffic of drugs by crimelords.
The basis for this law is that it is not up to the government to decide what you want to do to your body. "The use of soft drugs in general is not prohibited, on the general principle of self-determination in matters of the body. Specifically, that it is not illegal to hurt yourself; however, you remain liable for the consequences of your actions. Because of this, users are not prosecuted for possession of small quantities of soft drugs ("for personal use")."
» mdc replied on Tue Apr 11, 2006 @ 2:24pm. Posted in Y do u think Alcohol , tobacco ....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
hahaha
» mdc replied on Tue Apr 11, 2006 @ 2:23pm. Posted in Y do u think Alcohol , tobacco ....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
They make a distinction between hard and soft drugs.
A distinction is drawn between hard drugs (which bear "unacceptable" risks; e.g. cocaine, heroin and ecstasy) and soft drugs such as the psychedelic psilocybin mushrooms as well as cannabis products: hashish and marijuana (as defined in the Dutch Opium Act). The distinction is drawn on whether the substance is only psychologically addictive (i.e. producing no worse effect than moderate craving when withdrawn) or also physically addictive (i.e. there is solid proof the drug could cause dangerous withdrawal symptoms and/or lasting physical damage). One of the main aims of this policy is to separate the markets for soft and hard drugs so that soft drug users are less likely to come into contact with hard drugs. This policy also aims to take the soft drug market out of the hands of the criminals, thus reducing crime.
» mdc replied on Tue Apr 11, 2006 @ 2:21pm. Posted in Y do u think Alcohol , tobacco ....
mdc
Coolness: 148810
Originally posted by NAMASTÉ...

le pot est légal à amsterdam, je sais pas comment est la situation là-bas par contre. est-ce qu'il a toujours été légal ou il a été légalisé? est-ce que les autres drogues sont légales?


Wikipedia has a good article about that.
mdc's Profile - Community Messages