Philosophical Debate Here
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» OMGSTFUDIEPLZKTX replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 10:25pm |
 Coolness: 66715 | Do we exist in the future, present, and past?
discuss and debate |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» screw_you replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 10:28pm |
 Coolness: 77240 | we r born we live do stupid shit and some a little less stupid shit and then we die ...thats it thats all |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» elixireleven replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 10:40pm |
| Coolness: 74040 | old high school quote:
the past is dead, the present is here, the future is yet to come and potentially may not even exist. right now is all we have left. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 10:52pm |
 Coolness: 339865 | no, we don't exist and we're not having this conversation. or at least i'm not longer having it. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:01pm |
 Coolness: 92465 | i have a question
do u think time exists in the same dimension or that it exists as a seperate dimension intertwining with the material world? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flatlinedive replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:07pm |
| Coolness: 64105 | we exist simultaneously in many realities.
past, present, future.......these are all just words for a linear world in which we are limited by the constraints of time. we exist in a universe where time is meaningless and yet we feel the need to give meaning to our lives by categorizing all moments. we are always everywhere and nowhere. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:16pm |
| Coolness: 339865 | not me, i'm right here. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:31pm |
| Coolness: 92465 | u totally missed the point of the question there.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:33pm |
| Coolness: 339865 | i missed nothing. i see it as being pointless to toil over matters that cannot be solved nor proven. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» OMGSTFUDIEPLZKTX replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:41pm |
| Coolness: 66715 | hence the point of debate |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:45pm |
 Coolness: 202315 | My Uncle once said "The past was yesterday.. the present is today the future is tomorrow..
Yesterday never happened, cause it was the past, each day is the first day of our lives and tomorrow is the unknown. Each new day is a new beginning." |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mdc replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:51pm |
| Coolness: 149015 | time intertwines with this "material world"... time is a whole new dimension...
we are in the third dimension, time is the fourth on which all depends, it is the measure of all things |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» ontheroadagain replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:56pm |
 Coolness: 54535 | the past is always with us, it is continually the present,the future is in every breath
philosophy is not to solve, it is to discuss |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» screw_you replied on Thu May 8, 2003 @ 11:56pm |
| Coolness: 77240 | heather p's uncle is cool |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mali replied on Fri May 9, 2003 @ 12:01am |
| Coolness: 202315 | Yep yep
I have many Uncles though.. but yeah I was talking about Pat's Daddy Pooh |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» daFTWin replied on Fri May 9, 2003 @ 12:23am |
 Coolness: 276635 | Pats dad said that!?!?... huh... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Fri May 9, 2003 @ 1:05am |
| Coolness: 63360 | >do u think time exists in the same dimension or >that it exists as a seperate dimension >intertwining with the material world?
Sophia (I'm quite sure it's you), perhaps the universe is so complicated that our concept of time and space is completly off the mark. Humans are tiny little flecks of cosmic dust, our capacity to experience reality is limited. We don't really know the nature of the universe, and maybe Neoform is right, it might be impossible for us to answer a question like yours (though by no means does it mean they shouldn't be asked). We view the universe with our human senses, yet maybe the true form of the universe can only be experienced in whole through senses we don't have. Under those other senses, the universe might reveal itself to behave in ways we were never even aware it could. Maybe if we were to experience the universe through the eyes of some Grey Poupon Fed Stupidstupids on the other side of the cosmos... we'd realize that time, space and all that might not even exist, that they might be nothing more than the aftereffects of whatever the universe is really doing. Who know's ;) Ohhhhh and miss Moondance, writing "u" instead of "you" makes you sound like the internet's equivalent of a redneck ;) Which is cool if you don't care about that. It's rubbing off on Nymph though, so if you are Sophia ... I blame you for his new redneck writing style. It's a little known fact but Nymph becomes whoever he dates. It's true. anyhow, blah blah blah! I'll see you all around, time for bed. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Fri May 9, 2003 @ 3:32am |
 Coolness: 299525 | god i had a fucking philospphy exam today. give me a fucking break here |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Fri May 9, 2003 @ 3:49am |
 Coolness: 685790 | Fred's random drunk/high thought of the evening:
During foreplay with a woman, one must treat her vagina like a Choose Your Own Adventure book, written in braille. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» eLDee replied on Fri May 9, 2003 @ 8:09am |
 Coolness: 121115 | He who controls the present controls the past, he who controls the past controls the futre
or sumthin' like that |
Philosophical Debate Here
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
