Noah
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:43am |
 Coolness: 63360 | You pig fucking scrotum licking douche bag! I can't believe you did what you did to you know who about you know what. You're fucking DISGUSTING. You're a horrid person. Infact, I can't believe how horridly horrid a horrid person you are. You are so horrid that your horridness is beyond human comprehension. That is how fucking horrid you are, Noah. Pretty damn horrid, if you ask me. But you wouldn't, because you know I hate you and disdain you and that if I ever saw you I would beat you up like a mad junglist. You horrid pigfucker!
I am so absolutely fucking baffled by how much you fucking suck, it's incredible. I stand here, typing this, completly baffled by your suckacity. COMPLETLY. You are a focal point for all which sucks in the universe, sucking everything which sucks into you, like some sort of giant blackhole of suckiness. You, Noah, suck. FUCK. I remember when we first met. You were hanging out with Candace over in NDG at that pool hall Robert owns. You remember Robert right? You remember how you fucked him over? Asshole! That's what you are. One giant rectum. Always have been! Hey, I wonder whatever happened to Candy? Oh yeah, I remember... You fucked her over the same way you fucked Bobby over! YOU FUCKER. fuck, you suck. I'm leaving for Halifax tomorrow, to visit Candace for the month. She might visit Montreal this summer. If she does she'll kick your ass. That's it, i'm out. Nymph guy. Check your email, if you're all clueless about why I'm ripping on you, you stupid fucker. PEACE, Carl (yeah, that's fucking right, bitch. Now you remember huh?) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:46am |
 Coolness: 299525 | was this generated with an insult generator? cuz if it is its pretty bad |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» screw_you replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:47am |
 Coolness: 77240 | wow |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:48am |
 Coolness: 685790 | Wow, that 'mo used "suckacity".
I though I was the only person that said that! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:49am |
| Coolness: 299525 | actually nevermind. i think hes refering to an essay noah wrote years ago |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:49am |
| Coolness: 63360 | Yeah, it was. And if by bad, you mean pretty fucking brilliant, you're right. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» mdc replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:49am |
| Coolness: 149015 | i agree completely |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:49am |
| Coolness: 63360 | That's no simple fucking essay, it has roots in the truth. Robert and Candace are real fucking people. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:50am |
| Coolness: 299525 | i like the abuse of the word horrid. it makes this thread so horrid, cuz of all its horridness |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» OMGSTFUDIEPLZKTX replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:51am |
| Coolness: 66715 | this post is meaningless if we don't know what exactly Noah did...
because it would be very hard for most people to comprehend noah fucking someone over... in otherwords, lets have some details. It would at least make for a good read since its probally complete utter bullshit anyways! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:54am |
| Coolness: 63360 | It's not simply complete and utter bullshit. There happen to be some serious issues at hand, issues I'll let NOAH disclose if he chooses to. I'm going to be gone come tomorrow for the month so he'll be able to say whatever he wants without fear of the truth messing it up. And I assure you, giving Noahs behavioral norms, what he did is shocking enough to warrant my internet bitchslap.
I'm just letting him know that I know, and that I'm not fucking down with what he did. And yes, this thread is horrid isn't it? But that's human relatin for yah. Horrid as horrid can be. And besides, who here don't be likin the edrama? edited for nothin |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:58am |
| Coolness: 299525 | I am writing on behalf of myself and a few of my friends to state that the odds are more than ten to one that Mr. Test Person's message is apparently that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: The account I have just given of his wheelings and dealings undeniably shows that social stability and family unity are two things that what I call churlish creeps have no concern for. In fact, I have said that to Test on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops trying to provide power-drunk converts to opportunism with an irresistible temptation to deprive people of dignity and autonomy. If he got his way, he'd be able to force me to become clinically depressed. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. Okay, I've vented enough frustration. So let me end by saying that Mr. Test Person has no idea what he's doing. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:59am |
| Coolness: 63360 | see, that was done with an insult generator and it totally isn't ANYWHERE near as brilliant as *my* piece, as MY insult generator had adlib features making it possible to *personalize* the message. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» OMGSTFUDIEPLZKTX replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 12:59am |
| Coolness: 66715 | well
this IS senseless eDrama, but there hasn't been a case of eDrama this vibrant here in a long time! Its also a clear sign that your vocabulary is minute and insignificant. This being based on your obsessed usuage of the word "horrid". I suggest visiting [ www.thesaurus.com ] - It will help you come up with crazy cool new ways to insult people instead of just calling them "horrid". |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 1:00am |
| Coolness: 63360 | I don't need a large vocabulary, the word *horrid* itself alone is all I need to put Noah in his place. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» OMGSTFUDIEPLZKTX replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 1:01am |
| Coolness: 66715 | yes you do.
you said "horrid" so many times that you've completely butchered its meaning. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 1:02am |
| Coolness: 685790 | Mr. Test's worst transgressions are systematically whitewashed by the press. To counteract that whitewash, I will use the remainder of my space here to expose Test for who he really is. I assume you already know that the only way that we can fight Test, the only way we can beat him, is to turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action, but I have something more important to tell you. He may find it inconceivable that his virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to his vices and the size of his mouth, but he'll come to his senses when you least expect it. Contrary to what he would have you believe, every time he tries, Test gets increasingly successful in his attempts to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well.
You may be surprised to learn that I was once like him. I, too, wanted to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to hold him responsible for the hatred he so furtively expresses. I understand that militarism is correctly defined by its contentious style, structure, and methods, not by its stated or apparent ideological premises or goals, but many people respond to his flagitious cop-outs in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we reinforce what is best in people. While what I call impetuous, unpatriotic soi-disant do-gooders claim to defend traditional values, they actually stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. Test truly believes that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. I hope you realize that that's just a testy pipe dream from an out-of-touch pipe, and that in the real world, I wonder what would happen if Test really did expose and neutralize his enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate. There's a spooky thought. The key point here is that if we can understand what has caused the current plague of whiney psychopaths, I believe that we can then present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. With Test's values hanging over us like the Sword of Damocles, it makes sense that Test and his shock troops are, by nature, morbid opportunists. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but Test doesn't want us to do what comes naturally. He would rather we settle for the meatless bone of revanchism. I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Test's teachings mean delays in getting things processed, errors in handling requests, inefficiency, and many more years of error from keeping an old system alive." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather, because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that Test can get away with lies (e.g., that if he kicks us in the teeth, we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick), because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Test is lying. For the nonce, he is content to pilfer the national treasure. But in the near future, he will lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity. There are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Test doing some stentorian thing every few weeks. His recommendations form a vast brainwashing and brain-contaminating machine, which has worked, on the whole, with great efficiency. No wonder that his modus operandi is to interfere with my efforts to act as a positive role model for younger people. That's self-evident, and even Test would probably agree with me on that. Even so, it is immature and stupid of him to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to make this world a better place in which to live, and that's why I say that his stories about antipluralism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept's initial implausibility. How dare Test criticize my values when his are so obviously predatory? Inane particularism has long been the nucleus of his blanket statements. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that if we don't soon tell Test to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his disrespectful, wretched bons mots, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Test our permission to do so. I never cease to be amazed at the way that I want to thank him for his memoirs. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how fastidious Test can be. Given what I know about brazen, voluble prima donnas, I can say with confidence that I don't care what others say about him. He's still doctrinaire, blasphemous, and he intends to seize control of the power structure. There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that Test managed to convince a bunch of spineless imperious-types to help him drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. What was the quid pro quo there? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. He has stated that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. That's just pure negativism. Well, in Test's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that we must reach out to people with the message that outrage pounded in my temples when I first realized that Test wants to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to address the continued social injustice shown by insolent lumpenproletariats. I am not mistaken when I say that he uses the word "anthropogeographical" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. What Test fails to mention in his offhand remarks is actually quite telling. For example, did you know that Test wants to insult my intelligence? Or that if we let him adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined, civilization itself will fall? His satraps say that nothing would help society more than for them to force us to do things or take stands against our will. Sorry, I don't buy that. He can't possibly believe that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. He's stupid, but he's not that stupid. Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to work together towards a shared vision and those who wish to grant huffy recidivists the keys to the kingdom. Naturally, Test belongs to the latter category. An inner voice tells me that he frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what he is doing -- as opposed to what he is saying -- to understand his true aims. Test accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his assertions show nothing but bigotry. Why does Test make those sorts of accusations, then? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: In public, Test vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Test never fails to obstruct various important things. Even by Test's own account, he would have us believe that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Test is surrounded by nerdy teetotalism enthusiasts who parrot the same nonsense, which is why I want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point. It is no news that by an odd twist of fate, his attempts to promote besotted ideologies, such as nonrepresentationalism, are just a game to him. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that if he got his way, he'd be able to coordinate a revolution. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. Test wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well, because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that Test has spent untold hours trying to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that he is just one in a long line of capricious oafs who like to impose a narrow theological agenda on secular society? A complete answer to that question would take more space than I can afford, so I'll have to give you a simplified answer. For starters, many people are incredulous when I tell them that he intends to impose a "glass ceiling" that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs. "How could Test be so tactless?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is undeniably possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Test plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that on the issue of diabolism, he is wrong again. Sure, evil prevails when good people do nothing. But the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences? We must express our concerns about Mr. Test's disagreeable, closed-minded editorials. We must preserve the peace. And we must spread awareness of the delusional nature of Test's pronouncements. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 1:02am |
| Coolness: 63360 | Oh, come on, like that really matters.
This isn't about meaning, but a lack of it. A lack of it on Noah's part for being such a cock knocking pigfucker! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 1:03am |
| Coolness: 685790 | You mean a HORRID cock knocking pigfucker. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Gone replied on Tue May 6, 2003 @ 1:04am |
| Coolness: 63360 | yeah, basically. |
Noah
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
