Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
Page: 1 2 Next »»Rating: Unrated [0]
Some Can Use Of Substances And Retain A
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» beercrack replied on Sun Oct 30, 2005 @ 10:14am
beercrack
Coolness: 71415
this nbeeds obvious corrections but i post it as i wrote it cuz its kind of retarded

2005-10-30 01:05:07 - some can use of substances and retain a level of helath [ Edit ]

drimking alcohol and taking drugs because of the load on your systems is much tend to make one hungry and according to on'e diet this can cause pathology especially seen in those not following a healthy regimen as evidenced in the fact that some can use of substances and retain a level of helath for example rich peopel having access to a richer variety of food sources as opposed to itinerants eating the processed low-cost low-health food available - more bad food makes more bad health not necessarily drugs or alcohol but the total view of diet and substance use and another determinant in health of the mental variety can be expressed in the preference of drug type for example psychedelic versus narcotic - illiterate itinerants prefering narcotics (eg. narcosis - death) - and culturally accepted intelligentsia prefering mind exxpanding drugs - in all evidence it is primary to have an excellent diet intake and guided consumption habits and most importanly meaningful relationships with one'S human family genus and proper for a deeper understand in how to creative a healthy balance in one's persoanl culture holistically speaking
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» madforbrad replied on Sun Oct 30, 2005 @ 2:38pm
madforbrad
Coolness: 44530
well that was some bull shit wasn't it
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Morphine replied on Mon Oct 31, 2005 @ 10:28am
morphine
Coolness: 50950
fuckin hell........do us all a a favour and correct it before you post it next time. punctuation and grammar go a long way
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» beercrack replied on Mon Oct 31, 2005 @ 9:32pm
beercrack
Coolness: 71415
it'S actually meant to be a run on sentence
i wrote it while stoned so that's why it's retarded

today i support the temperance movement
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PitaGore replied on Thu Nov 3, 2005 @ 10:10am
pitagore
Coolness: 471785
weird stuff but yah, show some respect to that wiseman Tits please
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 5:56am
moondancer
Coolness: 92245
I think it's just that no one understands what he wrote.

"illiterate itinerants prefering narcotics (eg. narcosis - death) - and culturally accepted intelligentsia prefering mind exxpanding drugs "

makes no sense.. cause all drugs are narcotics. Whatever he meant to say I probably don't agree though.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» trashandsuicide replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 6:29am
trashandsuicide
Coolness: 75250
I think its TITS trying to be clever, see... when he was high he wrote this big long thing about how drugs aren't as bad as everyone says they are and then he spewed out a bunch of crap in what he thought was an iron-clad pro-drug argument. The next day however, he re-read it and realized he was an idiot and what he wrote made no sense. So, his "pro-drug" argument became "anti-drug" because the authour is clearly under the influence and not making sense. Am I right?
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» beercrack replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 10:33am
beercrack
Coolness: 71415
plus ou moin. not really trying to be pro-drug but it came out that way 'cuz i was high u know. yeah. haha. btw joints with salvia is MESSED UP.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 12:48pm
flo
Coolness: 146305
Originally posted by MOONDANCER...

I think it's just that no one understands what he wrote.

"illiterate itinerants prefering narcotics (eg. narcosis - death) - and culturally accepted intelligentsia prefering mind exxpanding drugs "

makes no sense.. cause all drugs are narcotics. Whatever he meant to say I probably don't agree though.


narcotics are drugs that provoke sleepy and soothed behaviour, whereas mind expanding drugs most often boost and energize. that's the same kind of difference that the one between 'indica' and 'sativa' cannabis.

and i mostly agree with the quoted sentence.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Dark_Angel_2 replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 2:33pm
dark_angel_2
Coolness: 69380
i prefer sativa
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 4:16pm
flo
Coolness: 146305
then you might belong to the culturally accepted intelligentsia ? :p
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Dark_Angel_2 replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 7:13pm
dark_angel_2
Coolness: 69380
oh goody!!!!!! i feel so privilaged.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» trashandsuicide replied on Mon Nov 7, 2005 @ 11:47pm
trashandsuicide
Coolness: 75250
Originally posted by FLO...

Originally posted by moondancer...

I think it's just that no one understands what he wrote.

"illiterate itinerants prefering narcotics (eg. narcosis - death) - and culturally accepted intelligentsia prefering mind exxpanding drugs "

makes no sense.. cause all drugs are narcotics. Whatever he meant to say I probably don't agree though.


nar·cot·ic ( P ) Pronunciation Key (när-ktk)
n.
An addictive drug, such as opium, that reduces pain, alters mood and behavior, and usually induces sleep or stupor. Natural and synthetic narcotics are used in medicine to control pain.
A soothing, numbing agent or thing: “There was the blessed narcotic of bridge, at the Colony or at the home of friends” (Louis Auchincloss).

narcotics are drugs that provoke sleepy and soothed behaviour, whereas mind expanding drugs most often boost and energize. that's the same kind of difference that the one between 'indica' and 'sativa' cannabis.

and i mostly agree with the quoted sentence.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 12:06am
moondancer
Coolness: 92245
well not quite, we have stimulant and depressant for that purpose.

That definition is the legal definition of narcotic; pharmacologically, narcotics are the class of drugs that have a depressive effect on the central nervous system. (Not marijuana for instance) Most are opioids such as heroin or morphine and make you sleepy, hence the root narco- as in narcolepsy. Cocaine, however, is for some reason classed pharmacologically as a narcotic, though I'm pretty sure its the only one that's more of an 'up' than a 'down'...
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 12:09am
moondancer
Coolness: 92245
so you see a depressant is not necessarily a narcotic and a stimulant can also be a narcotic.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 2:46am
flo
Coolness: 146305
cocaine classed as a narcotic ?! just weird...
anyway we weren't using the same definition but i guess we agree now.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 3:27am
moondancer
Coolness: 92245
it makes perfect sense actually. If narcotics are drugs that have a depressive effect on the central nervous system.. well maybe the numbing effect of coke is a consequence of that depression on the central nervous system. Which would mostly explain why pot isn't a narcotic. We can argue it works for some pain, but just by simply smoking it and getting high, we can tell it's not working in the same way. It doesn't quite numb like that.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 3:39am
moondancer
Coolness: 92245
so affecting your central nervous system seems to implicate a drug that is capable of numbing your actual skin.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» trashandsuicide replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 4:06am
trashandsuicide
Coolness: 75250
It also has to do with brainwaves and the firing of synapses and so on... when you're "high" on pot, your brain activity isn't slowed at all, its just not neccesarily making much sense, on coke, your brain functions on a much more simple, straight forward path, actually synapses being fired are less then when you'r high.

Suffice it to say "Narcotics" seems to have morphed in modern language to mean "substances that fuck you up and aren't booze"... at least, in police speak anyhopw.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Tue Nov 8, 2005 @ 4:12am
moondancer
Coolness: 92245
yeah in police speak it definitely seems to be all the same.
Some Can Use Of Substances And Retain A
Page: 1 2 Next »»
Post A Reply
You must be logged in to post a reply.