| Page: 1 | Rating: Funny [1] |
Done By Design
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Phoenix a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 9:24am |
 Coolness: 81920 | This article on security (or the lack thereof) is about 2 years old but very interesting nonetheless.
[ www.indymedia.org.uk ] |
| I'm feeling you up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 11:00am |
 Coolness: 92495 | Okay, I believe what he's saying about Microsoft trying to obtain my personal information but he does not know anything about what he's talkign about. This guy did little to no research. First of all HKEY_CURRENT_USER is not a psychological profiling function! It's a basic Windows API command used regularly by every single C++ programmer out there to obtain your user settings(in order to customise a programs settings fro your needs). NOT your psychological profile. You can peice together all the computer settings and try form there to obtain a psychological profile of someone but to define these functions as such is absolute bullshit. He could have said what the fucntion really does and then explained from there how it's abused but instead he made outragious statements about it's nature and purpose. These are very useful and often necessary functions. If you are playing a videogame well the game has to know what your graphic capabilities are so it can adjust the image for you or give you an error message instead of crashing your computer. If that's psychological profiling I'm the tooth fairy. Also, his explanation of Cookies is pure hoo-ha. Cookies is not useless, we need cookies. This site uses cookies, all site with users use cookies. It's what allows you to stay logged on to a site(or log off) without having to enter in a username and password on every page. There are some alternatives for minimal things but in general they are not good enough. He over-exaggerates the type of information that cookies contains by telling you what CAN be conclude from it, not what the inforamtion is specifically, the information directly stored in a cookie is much more innocent and practical than that, what someone decides to do with it or derive fom it is another matter. So in conclusion he may be right about his theory(I hardly doubt it) but his long and not-worth-finishing article is full of misconceptions, either he's not qualified to write it or he considers proving his point more important than providing valid information that's not full of holes. As if need AAAALLL this stuff to obtain your personal information, I mean common, as if it's that fuckign hard. This article shoudl have been restricted to the first paragraph. |
| I'm feeling long gone right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 1:01pm |
 Coolness: 339895 | you really need to learn better punctuation. every response you ever give is one huge paragraph.. |
| I'm feeling thespread.org right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 1:09pm |
| Coolness: 92495 | I can punctuate how I want, paragraphs are subjective. |
| I'm feeling long gone right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» M-A-X a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 1:25pm |
 Coolness: 121865 | JERRY! JERRY! JERRY! JERRY! |
| I'm feeling techno right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Phoenix a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 2:51pm |
| Coolness: 81920 | I've got an idea. From now on every post has to be in Iambic pentameter. |
| I'm feeling you up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 3:02pm |
 Coolness: 685820 | I don't think that would go over too well
People here just wouldn't get how to post And we would just be sitting here, laughing. |
| I'm feeling fat and sassy right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 3:29pm |
| Coolness: 339895 | Originally Posted By MOONDANCER
I can punctuate how I want, paragraphs are subjective. that's cool, i just never read anything you write cause it's unreadable in that fashion.. i know others who say the same. |
| I'm feeling thespread.org right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 3:47pm |
 Coolness: 509790 | The tooth fairy!? |
| I'm feeling normal right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Phoenix a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 3:54pm |
| Coolness: 81920 | Fred it's official that you are insane
I don't know why you speak your words in vain All things considered your style is unmatched. |
| I'm feeling you up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Tue 24 Oct, 2006 @ 4:13pm |
| Coolness: 685820 | I'm afraid my sanity is long gone
Or, some might say, my sanity's withdrawn That last line is wrong, a word is too long Too long, said the prawn, and let out a yawn So come sing along, and sing this fine song About one's sanity that is foregone |
| I'm feeling fat and sassy right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» regimental911 a répondu le Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 1:00pm |
 Coolness: 134500 | you wanna say that on a track as a hook man>>? |
| I'm feeling new tunes up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 1:02pm |
| Coolness: 685820 | hehe well that's a little on the silly side of things.. Gimme a theme of some sort for a tune and I'll bust out rhymezone and come up with something nuts :P |
| I'm feeling fat and sassy right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» regimental911 a répondu le Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 1:04pm |
| Coolness: 134500 | loosing your sanity,,how about that,,,i have ten pages on tha already,,you do the hook ok,,, |
| I'm feeling new tunes up right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 1:06pm |
| Coolness: 685820 | what speed beat, 90/180-ish or 130-140-isn? |
| I'm feeling fat and sassy right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer a répondu le Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 1:39pm |
| Coolness: 92495 | Originally Posted By DJNEOFORM
ORIGINALLY POSTED BY MOONDANCER I CAN PUNCTUATE HOW I WANT, PARAGRAPHS ARE SUBJECTIVE. THAT'S COOL, I JUST NEVER READ ANYTHING YOU WRITE CAUSE IT'S UNREADABLE IN THAT FASHION.. I KNOW OTHERS WHO SAY THE SAME. Okay, I believe what he's saying about Microsoft trying to obtain my personal information but he does not know anything about what he's talkign about. This guy did little to no research. First of all HKEY_CURRENT_USER is not a psychological profiling function! It's a basic Windows API command used regularly by every single C++ programmer out there to obtain your user settings(in order to customise a programs settings fro your needs). NOT your psychological profile. You can peice together all the computer settings and try form there to obtain a psychological profile of someone but to define these functions as such is absolute bullshit. He could have said what the fucntion really does and then explained from there how it's abused but instead he made outragious statements about it's nature and purpose. These are very useful and often necessary functions. If you are playing a videogame well the game has to know what your graphic capabilities are so it can adjust the image for you or give you an error message instead of crashing your computer. If that's psychological profiling I'm the tooth fairy. Also, his explanation of Cookies is pure hoo-ha. Cookies is not useless, we need cookies. This site uses cookies, all site with users use cookies. It's what allows you to stay logged on to a site(or log off) without having to enter in a username and password on every page. There are some alternatives for minimal things but in general they are not good enough. He over-exaggerates the type of information that cookies contains by telling you what CAN be conclude from it, not what the inforamtion is specifically, the information directly stored in a cookie is much more innocent and practical than that, what someone decides to do with it or derive fom it is another matter. So in conclusion he may be right about his theory(I hardly doubt it) but his long and not-worth-finishing article is full of misconceptions, either he's not qualified to write it or he considers proving his point more important than providing valid information that's not full of holes. As if need AAAALLL this stuff is needed to obtain your personal information, I mean common, as if it's that fuckign hard. This article shoudl have been restricted to the first paragraph. I even indented for you(I don't DO indents). Mise À Jour » moondancer a écrit sur Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 1:43pm Okay, I believe what he's saying about Microsoft trying to obtain my personal information but he does not know anything about what he's talkign about.
This guy did little to no research. First of all HKEY_CURRENT_USER is not a psychological profiling function! It's a basic Windows API command used regularly by every single C++ programmer out there to obtain your user settings(in order to customise a programs settings fro your needs). NOT your psychological profile. You can peice together all the computer settings and try form there to obtain a psychological profile of someone but to define these functions as such is absolute bullshit. He could have said what the fucntion really does and then explained from there how it's abused but instead he made outragious statements about it's nature and purpose. These are very useful and often necessary functions. If you are playing a videogame well the game has to know what your graphic capabilities are so it can adjust the image for you or give you an error message instead of crashing your computer. If that's psychological profiling I'm the tooth fairy. Also, his explanation of Cookies is pure hoo-ha. Cookies is not useless, we need cookies. This site uses cookies, all site with users use cookies. It's what allows you to stay logged on to a site(or log off) without having to enter in a username and password on every page. There are some alternatives for minimal things but in general they are not good enough. He over-exaggerates the type of information that cookies contains by telling you what CAN be conclude from it, not what the inforamtion is specifically, the information directly stored in a cookie is much more innocent and practical than that, what someone decides to do with it or derive fom it is another matter. So in conclusion he may be right about his theory(I hardly doubt it) but his long and not-worth-finishing article is full of misconceptions, either he's not qualified to write it or he considers proving his point more important than providing valid information that's not full of holes. As if need AAAALLL this stuff is needed to obtain your personal information, I mean common, as if it's that fuckign hard. This article shoudl have been restricted to the first paragraph. You see, this site won't even let me punctuate correctly. |
| I'm feeling long gone right now.. | |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform a répondu le Wed 25 Oct, 2006 @ 6:05pm |
| Coolness: 339895 | wow |
| I'm feeling thespread.org right now.. | |
Done By Design
| Page: 1 |
[ Haut de la page ] |
Poster Une Réponse |
Vous devez être connecté pour soumettre une réponse.
[ Haut de la page ] |
