Riddles
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» regimental911 a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 1:21pm |
Originally posted by OUU! ROMANTIQUE!...
men are like the numbnuts they are portrayed as on the tele. we play dumb ,so you guy's have the illusion of control. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 2:16pm |
Originally posted by REGIMENTAL911...
Originally posted by ouu! romantique!...
men are like the numbnuts they are portrayed as on the tele. we play dumb ,so you guy's have the illusion of control. This WHOLE time I thought 'oooo! romantique!' was a guy. Profile says otherwise though. wow |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» regimental911 a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 2:25pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 2:32pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 2:36pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 2:39pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 2:58pm |
sure you would! to buy a dildo.
Besides don't give them ideas because if you were really a girl, you'd find a man and sit on him. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 11:48pm |
Originally posted by LOX...
What is the next number in the series: 4, 9, 61, 52, 63, 94, 46, 18 1 |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 11:49pm |
Originally posted by MOONDANCER...
no you're confused, they did pay 9$ they didnt get 5$ back, they got 3$ back no... im really not confused |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino a répondu le Wed 25 May, 2005 @ 11:52pm |
Originally posted by DINOSAUR...
Originally posted by LoX...
What is the next number in the series: 4, 9, 61, 52, 63, 94, 46, 18 1 or 001 if you wanna get technical... followed by 121, 441, 961, 691.. and so on |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 1:23am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 1:30am |
you're calculation makes sense only because you got the right results. but you added 1$ each to 8,333 to calculate what they paid, which is absolutely incorrect, since they each receive a dollar BACK, they didnt pay that dollar. you would have to take 2$/3 and then take that result and add it to 8.333_. which in fact, also comes out to 9$
in conclusion: you ar confusedx! |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 2:39am |
in case you still don't understadn
THEIR CHANGE WAS 3$ THEY PAID 25$, plus the 2$ that the bellboy stole |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 8:55am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 11:33am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 11:51am |
Originally posted by MOONDANCER...
in case you still don't understadn THEIR CHANGE WAS 3$ THEY PAID 25$, plus the 2$ that the bellboy stole yes... they paid 25$ "they" being 3... comes out to 8.3333$ each now, seeing as they already got 1$ back that mean that they had orignally spent 9.333$ and seeing as they gave the bellboy 2$... that adds up to a beautiful 30$ 1$ can't disappear explain to me how they could have goven 30$ and only 29$ add up afterwards... its just a play on words... im really not confused... seriously... math is my calling... dont try and tell me my math is wrong |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 12:22pm |
Well technically they did "pay" only $25 for the room, what with that $5 that was suposed to go to them. It's more a question of what perspective your looking at the "problem" from.
If your the hotel manager, they payed $25 total for the room because you gave them back $5 from their original 30 (of which $2 got intercepted on the way back to them by a crooked bellhop) If you look at it from the perspective of the guys in the hotel room, they payed $10 each, and each got $1 back (not knowing about the $2 that was stolen) so in their eyes, they payed $9 each. The only "missing" money is the $2 that the bellhop took, but the numbers still all add up. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 1:05pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 2:20pm |
Originally posted by [SCREWHEAD]...
If you look at it from the perspective of the guys in the hotel room, they payed $10 each, and each got $1 back (not knowing about the $2 that was stolen) so in their eyes, they payed $9 each. NO! They paid 9.33$ each. Not 9$. Had they each paid 9$, 1$ would have disappeared. 9*3=27$ + 2$ for the bellhop = 29$ That extra dollar didnt disappear. They each paid 9.33$. I hate you all. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead a répondu le Thu 26 May, 2005 @ 3:02pm |
Ok, they EACH GOT BACK $1
there are *3* of them. 3*$1 = 3 + the stolen $2 = $5 If the 3 of them ORIGINALY PAYED 30$ TOTAL 30/3 = $10 payed by EACH Each one of them got back $1 Had they come into the hotel with ONLY a $10 each, then they would now ONLY have $1. The bellhop pockets $2 which doesn't factor at ALL into the fact that the 3 guys EACH PAYED $10 and then they EACH GOT BACK $1. |
Riddles
[ Haut de la page ] |
Poster Une Réponse |
Vous devez être connecté pour soumettre une réponse.
[ Haut de la page ] |