Rave Radio: Mysterio - We Are MacHines (4/32)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Editorial: Napa Loses Its Voice On Future Of Medical Pot
Title:US CA: Editorial: Napa Loses Its Voice On Future Of Medical Pot
Published On:2011-12-04
Source:Napa Valley Register (CA)
Fetched On:2011-12-10 06:02:15
NAPA LOSES ITS VOICE ON FUTURE OF MEDICAL POT

The city of Napa has kicked its share of the medical marijuana can
down the road another 10 months, smack-dab into the heart of the 2012
campaign season. But don't expect local voters to have much say in its
future.

In the wake of a federal crackdown on medicinal marijuana, the
moratorium on Napa's ordinance won't come back to the City Council
again until October 2012. If something is to change between now and
then, it has to happen at the national level.

Without a catalyst to suddenly intervene in a 15-year-old state law,
many believe the federal crackdown on California pot dispensaries two
months ago was politically motivated.

Some speculate President Obama wanted to eliminate medical marijuana
as a campaign issue enough to go against his own repeated 2008
campaign pledges that the federal government wouldn't interfere in
state medical marijuana laws.

Whatever the motivation, the fate of Napa's dispensary may depend on
whether the federal crackdown in October does indeed eliminate the
issue from the national campaign, or whether it elevates it.

The screeching halt to Napa's initiative - through a 45-day, and now
10-month, moratorium - was never a local decision. With early judicial
decisions favoring federal marijuana law, it would be idiotic not to
interrupt the ordinance process.

Had the City Council moved forward with the ordinance as written, it
would be inviting a federal lawsuit photocopied from the government's
suit against the city of Long Beach.

Napa's desire to tightly control the dispensary process and limit its
influence is what made the city legally vulnerable. The option to cede
some of that power does exist, but won't be embraced by either city
officials or the voting public.

Restrictions are what made the process move forward. And eliminating
such regulation - after years of public comment in favor of it - is
not an idea candidates are likely to embrace.

Council members, all of whom could be on the campaign trail, will be
happy to wait and watch the issue play out further on the federal stage.

And there has been little evidence that local residents will want to
press them on it.

Thus far, the dispensary initiative hasn't resulted in much raging
public debate, at least not in comparison to red-light cameras or
one-way streets.

And making it a local campaign issue now won't net much
progress.

Napa can't proceed with its ordinance as written unless something
changes at the federal level. And Napa won't revise its ordinance to
lessen restrictions for fear of allowing marijuana to become too
pervasive locally.

Without change at the federal level, Napa's medical marijuana
dispensary is dead.
Member Comments
No member comments available...