Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Anonymous
New Account
Forgot Password
News (Media Awareness Project) - Afghanistan: U.S. and Britain Again Target Afghan Poppies
Title:Afghanistan: U.S. and Britain Again Target Afghan Poppies
Published On:2009-08-08
Source:Washington Post (DC)
Fetched On:2009-08-09 06:20:50
U.S. AND BRITAIN AGAIN TARGET AFGHAN POPPIES

Farmers Would Be Paid Not to Grow Crop

The U.S. and British governments plan to spend millions of dollars
over the next two months to try to persuade Afghan farmers not to
plant opium poppy, by far the country's most profitable cash crop and
a major source of Taliban funding and official corruption.

By selling wheat seeds and fruit saplings to farmers at token prices,
offering cheap credit, and paying poppy-farm laborers to work on
roads and irrigation ditches, U.S. and British officials hope to
provide alternatives before the planting season begins in early
October. Many poppy farmers survive Afghanistan's harsh winters on
loans advanced by drug traffickers and their associates, repaid with
the spring harvest.

"We need a way to get money in [farmers'] hands right away," said a
senior U.S. military official in Afghanistan.

The program replaces the Bush administration's focus on crop
eradication, which "wasted hundreds of millions of dollars,"
according to Richard C. Holbrooke, the Obama administration's special
representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Destroying the crops
succeeded only in "alienat[ing] poor farmers" and "driving people
into the hands of the Taliban," he told reporters last week.

But many previous U.S.-funded crop-substitution programs have failed
as well, from Asia to Latin America. A similar plan in Colombia,
begun in the late 1990s, has barely made a dent in the level of
cocaine production, although the country began to stabilize in recent
years as its U.S.-trained military adopted new strategies against
armed insurgents and civil institutions were strengthened.

Officials maintain that the new Afghan plan differs from unsuccessful
"alternative" plans because it is an integral part of a
military-development strategy that includes tens of thousands of U.S.
troops to keep the Taliban and traffickers at bay while Afghan
security forces are being trained. Plans call for hundreds of U.S.
and international aid experts to work directly with farmers and local
officials until the Afghan government has matured.

"The way [the assistance] is offered is important," said the senior
U.S. military official, one of several who spoke on the condition of
anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the program on
the record. "We are not providing subsidies . . . we are not just
handing out cash." Farmers will have a "stake" in the program, he
said, buying vouchers for seeds and fertilizers for about 10 percent
of their value. Cash will be distributed only as credit or for work
performed, the official added.

The United States and its allies in Afghanistan have long debated
whether they should simply pay farmers for not planting poppy, a
short-term fix that experts have deemed counterproductive. Farmers
probably would take the money and "grow it anyways," said another
U.S. official in Afghanistan. "We would likely drive the price up,"
he added, "as there would now be competition between the narcotics
trade and the government. More farmers would therefore plant more
poppy next year."

The epicenter of the overlapping wars against opium production and
the Taliban is southern Afghanistan's Helmand province, where more
than two-thirds of the country's poppy is grown. Thousands of Marines
and British troops are in the midst of a major offensive there
against entrenched insurgent forces and are providing security in
villages as they are cleared.

"By this time next year," the senior military official said, "what we
want to see is decreased poppy harvest. For us, that will be a metric
of success. If we don't get conditions set now, in the next 60 days,
we're not going to get the results we'd like."

The timeline is daunting. A planned "civilian surge" of hundreds of
U.S. aid officials and agriculture experts has been slow to arrive. A
micro-finance loan program is in the planning stages, and although
$300 million in aid has been set aside for "rapid response"
initiatives, including voucher programs for seeds and fertilizer,
distribution has been sluggish. Mohammad Gulab Mangal, the governor
of Helmand, whom U.S. officials have praised for encouraging local
communities to turn away from poppy, held the first of eight
scheduled outreach meetings only last week.

The plan also includes stepped-up efforts to interdict drug shipments
and destroy stockpiles. The Drug Enforcement Administration expects
to increase its manpower on the ground from 13 agents in 2008 to 81
by the end of this year. The Marine assault in Helmand, a DEA
official in Kabul said, has "greatly enhanced" the agency's ability
to take action there, he said.

The DEA is also training Afghan police in counternarcotics
investigations, and the Justice Department is developing a program
for Afghan prosecutors, although those efforts are said to be moving
slowly. Officials disagree over how much of the profit from
Afghanistan's opium exports goes directly into Taliban coffers.
According to Holbrooke, most Taliban funding comes from wealthy
individuals in the Persian Gulf region. But there is widespread
agreement among U.S. officials that drug traffickers, warlords,
corrupt government officials and insurgents work cooperatively to
continue cultivation, processing and exports.

Some of the greatest challenges to the new strategy are at the level
of farmhouse economics. More than 365,000 Afghan farm households
earned about $730 million from poppy last year -- a fraction of the
$3.4 billion earned from opium exports, according to the United
Nations, but an amount nearly equal to the national government's $750
million in official revenue.

"The average annual cash income of opium-poppy growing households in
2007 was 53 percent higher than those of non-opium poppy growing
households," the U.N. 2008 Afghanistan Opium Survey reported, and
"farmers in Helmand reported the highest cash income," 70 percent of
which came from poppy.

The average Helmand farmer cultivates less than an acre of land, with
about half an acre planted in poppy yielding a gross income of about
$2,000. After paying 45 percent of that in production costs, and 10
percent in local taxes, he nets about $900, more than twice what he
would earn from wheat at current, albeit rising, prices.

Spring opium is harvested in May, after the plant flowers and seed
capsules develop. The capsules are lanced and a latex-like opium gum
oozes out and is gathered by hand. In Helmand, where production per
acre is highest, capsules are lanced an average of four times in a
labor-intensive process.

Extra workers travel from all over Afghanistan for the harvest, and
the pay is higher than it is for virtually all other forms of
unskilled labor. The average daily wage for construction work, the
United Nations reported, is $3.60. Wheat harvesting earns $4.40, and
opium "lancing/gum collection" pays $9.50. Wages in Helmand for
lancing, $15 a day, are the highest in the country.

"What we're looking for is a way to compete with that," the senior
military official said of the opium economy. "This is not easy. . . .
There is no silver bullet."
Member Comments
No member comments available...