Reel Life Cinema Thread!critiks/palmares
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Sat Jul 15, 2006 @ 12:27pm |
 Coolness: 158735 | photographie of dave la chapelle
 |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Necspress replied on Sat Jul 15, 2006 @ 2:20pm |
 Coolness: 53605 | this world should create more people like jean michel basquiat.
did anyone bother to go see "A Scanner Darkly" it just came out friday...ehm...yesterday. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» greatjob replied on Sat Jul 15, 2006 @ 3:17pm |
 Coolness: 282455 | It came out yesterday dude...it was amazing! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Necspress replied on Sat Jul 15, 2006 @ 11:41pm |
| Coolness: 53605 | ok i went to see it my after all, "a scanner darkly" and it's the best thing that happend since the short anime series
"Serial Experiment Lain". No i didn't read the book so... i guess that's why i liked it, since i had no expectations. Go see it, it's worth ten bucks. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Sun Jul 16, 2006 @ 10:10am |
| Coolness: 158735 | i have doubt that is better than his first movie using this kind of aproache, waking life...
but i'm a fan of philip k dick and can't wait to see it.. maybe like you said Necspress; it's better to haven't read the book before ! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Sun Jul 16, 2006 @ 5:55pm |
| Coolness: 158735 | SYRIANA , by stephen gaghan , usa 2005 , 9/10
i liked very much this movie based on a non-fiction book titled "see no evil" writted by an ex cia agent, robert baer.... it's well directed ans writted. all along the movie the screenplay remember me an other excellent movie traffic, so i wasn't surprise to discover that stephen gaghan was at the origine of both script.. the story is complex and follow every protagoniste in the oil delicate subject..from the washington politic guy to the poor muslim who work for the oil cie and become extremist.. what i liked it's that it take a clear position in the way stephen gaghan exposed the story.. i think that you need guts to be american and make a movie like that! normaly i'm not a fan of matt damon but in this one i think the casting made a good job.. george clooney is excellent like always.. he's the executive producer... i think that on these time he's my fav hollywood person... instigator of alot of politic project like this one during the last few years... he's also an incredible director : good night and good luck and confession of a dangerous mind was excellent ! he's also executive producer of 2 movie that we talked recently in [ rave.ca ] thread : a scanner darkly and insomnia.. he's also one of the only hollywood celebrety who decide to fight for the right of private life and don't play the game of starsystem too far.. you will like this movie if you liked serpico, traffic, jfk...ect SYNOPSIS : A missile disappears in Iran, but the CIA has other problems: the heir to an Emirate gives an oil contract to China, cutting out a US company that promptly fires its immigrant workers and merges with a small firm that has landed a Kazakhstani oil contract. The Department of Justice suspects bribery and hires an outside firm to find a scapegoat. The CIA also needs one when its plot to kill the Emir-apparent fails. Agent Bob Barnes, the fall guy, sorts out the double cross. An American economist parlays the death of his son into a contract to advise the sheik the CIA wants dead. The jobless Pakistanis join a fundamentalist group. All roads start and end in the oil fields. FUN STUFF ABOUT THE MOVIE : -The real Robert Baer (the author of "See No Evil", on which this screenplay is based) plays "CIA Security Officer #2". -Syriana is a term used by Washington think-tanks to describe a hypothetical re-shaping of the Middle East. -When Bob (George Clooney) meets with Hossein Hashimi, Hashimi compliments Bob for his fine Arabic, yet in fact, Bob only speaks the first word - of his supposed all Arabic line- in Arabic, then mumbles the rest in non-Arabic. -In the original draft of the script, the character of Bob Barnes was originally named Bob Baer, after Robert Baer's father. official web-site with trailers : [ syrianamovie.warnerbros.com ] |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 2:56am |
| Coolness: 158735 | ********MERZBOW MUSIC VIDEO***********
MINUS ZERO -------> [ www.youtube.com ] A 22 MIN GERMAIN SPECIAL ABOUT HIM----> [ www.youtube.com ] |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 3:15am |
| Coolness: 158735 | *****PATTI SMITH MUSIC VIDEO*******
AWWWWW ! that's fucking rock n roll ! :lol 
[ www.youtube.com ] ROCK 'N' ROLL NIGGER----> [ www.youtube.com ] GLORIA (one of the female greatest rock n roll song ever!)---------> [ www.youtube.com ] BECAUSE THE NIGHT------> [ www.youtube.com ] HEY JOE--------> [ www.youtube.com ] |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 3:17pm |
 Coolness: 150460 | Mmmm, I love political Movies. This years especially!
And just like you mentioned Gen, George Clooney is the man of the hour... 
This film takes you back to the 1950's, during a periode in time where a politician named Joesph McCarthy began an investigation into the US Army, conducting a type of paranoid witch hunt for Communist infiltrators into the United States or any American Communist sympathizers. One man in particular -who is featured in the film (through stock footage) is Milo Radulovich. A USAF reservist of Serbian descent who was accused of being a security risk in 1953, and was discharged because of relatives who were once suspected of being communists. This sets the stage for the ensuing drama. CBS's televison journalist Edward R. Murrow, became a voice of dissent against President McCarthy, criticizing the 2nd Red Scare which lead to the downfall of McCarthy's career. There is much criticism of the film itself. Some would tell you that Ed Murrow was just one of many protesting against McCarthy, and that the state of his office was already in shambles, leading us to believe that Ed Murrow was not the sole reason for the demise of President McCarthy. Regardless, the facts in the film are still true, and writers George Clooney and Grant Heslov have done an excellent job with the script, doing -what I feel- to be justice to the American People, serving as a reminder of their political past, and to raise awareness and interest to the state of contemporary American Politics. The film itself is the third production directed by George Clooney, and is fantastic outright. The photography is classical, all done in black and white. The plot itself may be a little highbrow, and slow moving, although this stlye gives the movie a great mood, and provides a great sense of tension (think of the electricity in the air before a thunderstorm). During these times, the practices were known now as [ ] [ www.imdb.com ] for Good Night and Good Luck 
In the Theme of Politics -which I must say was a pretty consistent in 2005, here is a film that was orginally produced as a BBC documentary, and was later realeased on "da' Big Screen." 
Those words are the starting point for a new film that takes a look at the American war machine over the past half century. "Why We Fight" by filmmaker Eugene Jarecki looks at conflicts from World War II right up to the current war in Iraq to examine the political, economic and ideological reasons that drive American war policy.
This film is definitely the most compelling documentary of the year. [ www.imdb.com ] WE FIGHT [ ] Farewell Adress 
On the same note. Once upon a time, a man named Frank Capra directed (many out of) seven propaganda newsreels that were commisioned by the United States Government, to convince the (once) isolationist nation to join into the Second World War and (ironically) join the Soviet forces against Hitler's Nazi Forces. In many of the newsreels, Capra and other directors spliced in Axis powers propaganda footage--recontextualizing it so it promoted the cause of the Allies instead. The films were edited mostly by William Hornbeck, and are some of the best examples of found-footage montage ever produced. The animated portions of the films were produced by the Disney studios – with the animated maps following a convention of depicting Axis-occupied territory in black.
The seven newsreels are:
Prelude to War (1942) (Academy award as Documentary Feature) - this examines the difference between democratic and fascist states, and covers the Japanese conquest of Manchuria and the Italian conquest of Ethiopia. [1] The Nazis Strike (1942) - covers Nazi geopolitics and the conquest of Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland. [2] Divide and Conquer (1943) [3] - chiefly about the Fall of France The Battle of Britain (1943) [4] The Battle of Russia (1943) part 1, part 2 The Battle of China (1944) [5] War Comes to America (1945) [6] - shows how the pattern of Axis aggression turned the American people against isolationism. Prelude to War and The Battle of China refer several times to the Tanaka Memorial – later shown to be a forgery – portraying it as "Japan's Mein Kampf" to raise American morale for a protracted war against Japan. In 2000 the United States Library of Congress deemed the newsreels "culturally significant" and selected them for preservation in the National Film Registry. The films, created by the U.S. Army Pictorial Services, are in the public domain; many of them are available for download at the Internet Archive. If your interested, you can watch most (if not all) of them here: [ ] We Fight 
 |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 7:51pm |
| Coolness: 158735 | ok ! THIS IS SO A BIG COINCIDENCE ! guess what??? i just came to pick 10 minutes ago why we fight!! :lol |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 7:52pm |
| Coolness: 150460 | And finally Gen, i've read your tutorial on Story Structure.
I remember studying this stuff in my first year at Dawson -they called it: The Arc. Intro-Climax-Conclusion. As you mentioned, they also explained to us the use of formulas in specific genres (I think I still have my notes somewhere(?)). There were (as i'm sure you know) formulas for: Westerns, Comedy, Action, Drama and Horror (maybe documentaries, but let's not go there). Each genre's formula was made -if i'm not mistaken- to simplefy movie going for americans. Like Fry out of Futurama once said: "You see? TV audiences don't want anything original. They wanna see the same thing they've seen a thousand times before... It was just a matter of knowing the secret of all TV shows: At the end of the episode, everything's always right back to normal." And it's the truth! Chaos is exciting but in the end we want the comfort of knowing everything is okay -let us call it, the happy ending; where everyone lives happily ever after. Some people don't wish to be brought into a twisted world with dark truths and hidden meanings, they just want to be entertained! (Love triumphs over Evil... again!!!) An example of a parody on the Horror formula was Scream. The characters created a situation (a murder) based on the horror formulas, and in mocked everyone who has been falling for it -you know: the girl always answers the phone, screams, drops the phone, runs upstairs, hides in the closet, looks out into her room to see the door knob turning slowly; she then screms again, climbs out her window (looks down)... then she either falls to her death (usually at the beginging) or if it's the end, the hero comes out to save her just before the police come rushing in. Very similar to Westerns. You've got the mysterious good guy whose just come into a town full of bandits. The sherif has lost control. There's a brodello. In the bordello the protagonist meets the antagonist -where they then have a stand off (ususally just threats like: "Don't ghet in ma' way... sucka!"). The protagonist then meets his "Femme Fatal" where everything goes to shit until high noon the next day, where he has enough time to kill all the bandits so he can ride off into the sunset. The only question I have, and i'll try and elaborate a bit more, is: Do all films generally have 3-scenes to separate between the intro-climax-conclusion? I've been paying attention to the simpsons lately, and it's been quite annoying (same thing with family guy). The first few scene introduce the problem, which leads to a conflict. They then introduce ANOTHER conflict (maybe 20-minutes into the show) and from the first conflict arises a solution for both problems. It's fucking weird!! They spend 20-mintues getting you into the story, then all of a sudden it changes completely! All the while you get to know more and more quirks about the characters, the odd joke, and the nicely packaged moral that is shoved down your throat before that person *shushes* you at the end of the credits. Anyways, i'm ranting again... but yeah, NEXT Lesson!!! :lol |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 7:53pm |
| Coolness: 150460 | Originally posted by BETTY HAZE...
ok ! THIS IS SO A BIG COINCIDENCE ! guess what??? i just came to pick 10 minutes ago why we fight!! :lol Haha, nice! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 7:54pm |
| Coolness: 158735 | i'm gonna watch it tonight ! :)
yeah good night and good luck is a excellent movie...it impress me alot! + i like black & white |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Mon Jul 17, 2006 @ 8:27pm |
| Coolness: 150460 | Hey Betty, did you know: "The movie, although released in black and white, was filmed on color film stock but on a grayscale set, and was later color corrected to black and white during post-production." Pretty cool, eh? ;)
Trivia: Rather than cast an actor to portray Senator McCarthy, the film uses actual footage of McCarthy. Ironically, some industry figures and audience members who attended preliminary screenings were unaware of this and in feedback comments indicated that the "actor" playing McCarthy was "over-the-top". This is cool too: Production designer James Bissell used the 3D computer graphics software program [ www.sketchup.com ] to model the entire studio set including all sets and camera angles |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Tue Jul 18, 2006 @ 12:01am |
| Coolness: 158735 | for your question about the number of scene..maybe i wasn't clear..
- a sequence is a series of scenes which comprise a distinct narrative unit, usually connected either by unity of location or unity of time.. 1-initial sequence = 3 scenes 2-provocative event = 3 sequences of 3 scenes each = 9 scenes 3-recapitulation = 3 to 5 scenes 4- resolution of the event = 3 sequences of 3 scenes each = 9 scenes 5-final sequence = 3 scenes i hope i understood well the question... climax is it the english word for peripeties(what happen during the midle of the story...) ? tommorow -------> chapter 2 = cutting of the space... :) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Tue Jul 18, 2006 @ 12:05am |
| Coolness: 158735 | about the technique employ for the b&w of good night and good luck : i didn't know at all...i was sure they filmed in b&w pellicule..
yeah i realised that it was real achives film...i think that is so cool...remember me forest gump...laugh alot when he met the real jfk ! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Tue Jul 18, 2006 @ 1:08am |
| Coolness: 158735 | NOWHERE , gregg araki , usa , 1997 , 10/10
ok this movie is incredible ! better than the doom generation ! it's deeply nihilistic and reprezent alot our generation(peeps of 21+)...this is so 90' ! that is the only problem of this kind of movie who are so linked at a period : it's not getting old good ! james duval is so a great sensitive actor*sigh*... d'ailleurs, the actor choice are very strange... still : very 90' ! alot of funny cameo : rose mcgowan , tracy lords(oooo!) , shanen doherty , Christopher Knight (again !) also one of the great photographer ever made a apparition : stephen sednaoui as himself , that we already talked here about.. the only casting choice that i disaproove is Kathleen Robertson : WHHHYYYY ??? she's so a bad actress!i already think she looked like a stupid empty count back in the day of Beverly Hills 90210(o well who didn't look like this in this serie!) ...but now it's just worse... funny also to see all these young actor who were new in the movie bizness at that time :mena suvari, Ryan Phillippe, Denise Richards... my fav thing in the movie are all the decor in the teen rooms... often a prolongation of the costume... this is not for peeps who ask to much questions or sensitive people who don't have my tasteless sens of humour ! cool soundtrack of the period ! decheances...sex...drugs...rock n roll ! SYNOPSIS: A group of teenagers try to sort out their lives and emotions while bizarre experiences happen to each one, including alien abductions, bad acid trips, bisexual experiences, suicides, bizarre deaths, and a rape by a TV star. All of this happens before "the greatest party of the year". FAV QUOTE : Dark: Dear diary, what a day. I swear I've never been so depressed, miserable, and lonely in my entire life. It's like I know there's got to be somebody out there somewhere... just one person in this huge, horrible, unhappy universe who can hold me in their arms and tell me everything is going to be okay. And how long do I have to wait before that person shows up. I feel like I'm sinking deeper and deeper into quicksand... watching everyone around me die a slow, agonizing, death. It's like we all know way down in our souls that our generation is going to witness the end of everything. You can see it in our eyes. It's in mine, look. I'm doomed. I'm only 18 years-old and I'm totally doomed. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Tue Jul 18, 2006 @ 2:09am |
| Coolness: 158735 | i used to be a huge fan when i was 13-14 ! i was in love with billy corgan *drool* awww he's so cute & intelligent ! :lol ...i don't have habit to be a finish fan but i met him by coincidence few years ago and my legs was checking like crazy....we had a kind of strange philosophical conversation but it was kind of bizare because i was so bad in english...he have the reputation to be snob but he was really nice with me...well after the big love declaration i made to him he don't had to much choice ! :lol
i still love them but really prefer their old stuff ! well...soooo...this is the time for a : SPECIAL SMASHING PUMPKINS MUSIC VIDEO ! i think their video are brilliant ! check out their new album...no release date yet...but supose to be soon !! 
[ www.youtube.com ] TONIGHT, TONIGHT----> [ www.youtube.com ] STAND INSIDE YOUR LOVE----> [ www.youtube.com ] THE EVERLASTHING GAZ------> [ www.youtube.com ] THIRTY THREE----> [ www.youtube.com ] BULLET WITH A BUTTERFLY WINGS----> [ www.youtube.com ] CHERUB ROCK (yeah!!!)----> [ www.youtube.com ] AVA ADORE------> [ www.youtube.com ] THE END IS THE BEGENNING...(batman!)----> [ www.youtube.com ] DISARM(this one is for my best mimi!)-----> [ www.youtube.com ] MAYONAISE~LIVE----> [ www.youtube.com ] [ www.youtube.com ] [ www.youtube.com ] [ www.youtube.com ] TRY TRY TRY----> [ www.youtube.com ] X.Y.U. ~LIVE-----> [ www.youtube.com ] |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Wed Jul 19, 2006 @ 1:39am |
| Coolness: 158735 | i watched why we fight !!! very excellent documentary.. it's not for nothing that this film win price at sundance!
i try to stay distant when i watch this kind of stuff... i'm very anxious of this fucked up complex situation... all these extremist wild capitalist are fucking sociopathe.. i feel alot of anger... and i'm preocupated. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Wed Jul 19, 2006 @ 3:22am |
| Coolness: 158735 | for this part mico i had little(big!) dificulty to translate some technique words.. i hope it's ok if you practice your french...anyway the most important is the comprehension and you can always find the right english word after! :)
************************************* CHAPTER 2 : CUT THE SPACE/ DECOUPAGE DE L'ESPACE CADRAGE AND COMPOSITION camera always cut(exclut) more things that it's can possibly be shown. the cadrage is a important choice because it present only a little part of the reality.it determit a field(champ), a space that we want to show,and a out field(hors-champ), a space that we don't want to show but who is obvious because of his natural prolongation. example : - showing a periscope imply a submarine under the image... - showing blood falling on shoes supose that someone got hurt.. the entrance in the field(champ) and the exit, a dialogue or a sound coming from whereelse or a physical moove by the exterior are the proof of this imaginary space that is never shown but very imply. the composition make easier the visual communication and permit to attract the spectator's attention on the essential, depending of the object's disposition and the character in the shot, and also depending of the actor's movement or the camera movement... the classical paint permited some geometry rules of the space. placing a subject where is the horizon line in the midle of the image is statik and it's can be more dynamique and propice for the reading of this image to respect some of the pictural composition rules : the composition by the 1/3, the triangular composition, the diagonale composition...ect.. example: the composition by the 1/3 consist by separate the image in 3 equal parts, verticale and horizontal. the main subject should be in one of the intersection points. the 3 horizontal portion correspond often at these 3 divisions: l'avant-plan, the midle, l'arriere-plan. idealisticly, we place the horizontal line on one of the line who separate the 1/3. in a big shot(plan), we place eye's line on the first line. we cut(cadre) a static character by degaging(degageant) space of the side that he direct his eyes(regard) and a dynamik subject by degaging the space of the side by he moove. ************************************** THE SHOT/ LE PLAN the shot(plan) is everything what happen between the turn in and the turn off of the camera.the lader of shot(echelle des plans ou d'eloignement de la camera) like we use in cinema is based on the human body. (it's impossible to imagine a big shot of a blue sky!) it was very usefull in cinema studio because it was coresponding at a physical reality, the one of the necessary distance for the mise au point des objectifs. if the american cut the standard shot(plan standard),the more used, at the lap, for see the cowboy's revolver, it's never been very clear why the italian made it at the knees.( one of the cinema mystery!!) but in television world it's different. they have a different terminology : shot-head(plan-tete), shot-belt(plan-ceinture), shot foot(plan pied)... but here we just don't cre because we talk about cinema... LADER OF SHOT ECHELLE D'ELOIGNEMENT DES PLANS GRAND ENSEMBLE : camera very far. cut a exterior seigh(paysage) very abstract. PLAN D'ENSEMBLE: camera far, you can still not see any character. DEMI-ENSEMBLE: cadrage who give an equal importance at the decor and the character. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this family of shot serve more the decor and context. shot of mise en situation...descriptive shot... PLAN MOYEN: the character is filmed from head to feet. he take all the image. PLAN AMERICAIN: character from head to lap. (italian is head to knees..) PLAN MI-MOYEN OR SEMI-RAPPROCHE: more near. from head to belt. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this family of shot serve to put the character in relation with other and what is around him. often dialogue or action shot.. narrative shot... PLAN RAPPROCHE: camera more near...from head to shoulder. GROS PLAN: camera is so near that the head or face of character take all the place. TRES GROS PLAN: camera who explore a detail in the face. when it's an object like a ringing phone we call it INSERT. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this family of shot want to isolate the character for showing his emotions...dramatic shot, psychologic shot... for sure in 1 sequence you can use different kind of shot. surtout when it's a plan sequence(when the camera filmed for long minutes different action without editing.) ************************************* ANGLE DE PRISE DE VUE if the type of shot(plan) corespond at a DISTANCE, l'angle de prise de vue correspond at the camera POSITION. NORMAL ANGLE some books propose that the normal angle is when the camera is at a heigh(from the floor) of 5 1/2 (1,65m). other books propose that is at the eyes nivel.(anyway,if the character is a kid,it's better like that!) PLONGEE the camera is more high than the character. CONTRE-PLONGEE the camera is lower than the character. ************************************** PROFONDEUR DE CHAMP this is the clearness zone(zone de nettete) who, for a focale or a diaphragme, is separate by the avant and arriere of the shot by mise au point. you can do it: -by lightening for give more deep effect at a arriere action.... -by the perspective(type of the focale or subject's distance). -by the mise au point depending if the focus is at the avant or arriere.. -by the movement of the subject or the camera. in fact, the profondeur de champ is the organisation of the shot(plan) in the axe. ************************************* tomorrow the following of this chapter...with the different camera movement... ************************************ all this theory can sound little stupid but when you gonna make a story board, beside the drawing you gonna need to write all your choice for the angle,shot,movement... it's fun because like that you don't need to be an expert in drawing and it's an international language that everybody can understand.. i would like to be with you Mico for showing you draw or image for explain my shit ! but whatever i'm sure when you gonna start university what the teacher gonna say gonna sound fammiliar after this ! if you know some of the english word that i don't know..say it to me! :) Update » Holly_Golightly wrote on Thu Jul 20, 2006 @ 9:45pm TEST TEST 12 21 CHECK CHECK ONE TWO MAMAMANETVOTREMAMANDANSENTLETANGO!
 Update » Holly_Golightly wrote on Thu Jul 20, 2006 @ 10:21pm SYBIL, DANIEL PETRIE, 1976, USA, 9.5/10
it's been a really long time that i wanted to watch this famous movie. my mom talked alot about it with me when i was kid but unfortunatly never watched with her... it's a funny coincidence because last week i tryed to find it at the store but it was sadly stolen :( ! yesterday i saw it in the new aquisition( for the 30th anniversary,it's a dvd with alot of suplement!2dvd!) and i was very excited! in fact this movie was made for television.. that's the only reason i unput .5 for it quote...just make me piss to see all the time the editing serving the publicity each 15 minutes( at least the movie was made in 76' and it's not ads each fucking 5 min. like today tv!) so it's very long,more than 3 hour, but it's worth it very much ! all this movie is on the shoulder of one actress : sally field... seriously, after this tour the force, she's my best actress ever! i never saw someone acting like that! for me sally field was like in the flying nun, that's it ! i'm just totaly amazed. i liked alot also the mise en scene and the editing. very traditional but efident. i think the idea to put the reflexion of a little girl when sybil is watching in a mirror was brilliant! the last couple of scene of psycanalise are little culcul but the ensemble is incredible! drama is not my fav genre but i think this movie reprezent what is supose to be. the subject is very passionate and it's hard to believe that someone already leave with this mental disease! SYNOPSIS: Based on a true story, Dr. Cornelia Wilbur (Joanne Woodward), an experienced psychiatrist, is faced with one of her most stressful cases: Sybil Dorsett (Sally Field) a late-20-year-old school teacher, who suffered such a harrowing upbringing, she consequently developed over 16 different personalities. THERE IS A LINK TO THE "REAL" SYBIL; Shirley Ardell Mason ON WIKIPEDIA---------> [ en.wikipedia.org ] |
Reel Life Cinema Thread!critiks/palmares
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
